Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Pretty sure CEF33Y is running a TD05-18G from memory.

Here is a bit more info and another pic because your image doesn't work on mobile lith.

1NWW5YW.jpg

4bFRymq.jpg

It says it's in a nissan housing but doesn't mention what A/R. Either way its pretty shit and the exact opposite of what i am looking for haha. I agree that a 7163 would crush it and i'm hoping a 6758 would be miles ahead in repsonse and still make roughly the same power. 

Price wise the best i have found for a 6758 here in Australia is;

$1506 for a iron bearing supercore
$630 AUD for a G type (T4 TS .80 A/R) turbine housing
$16 for turbine locking tabs
$78 for wastegate brcaket kit and i already have an EFR compatible single port turbosmart wastegate

So roughly $2200 compared to the $2800 that cartel online has them listed for (which is the cheapest in AUS) and the $3000 that GCG has them for.

Almost ready to pull the trigger on buying this EFR setup!

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Pretty sure CEF33Y is running a TD05-18G from memory.

 

Nah, I'm running a Hypergear OP6 highflow.

Stock manifolds, unopened motor, just supporting mods on 98. Cheap setup, and i'm pretty happy with it (read- used to the lag)

Super keen to see what results you get though.

  • Like 1

Ah yeah, 18Gs are one of my less favourite units funnily enough - not least because they are heading in the direction of 20Gs for lag and 16Gs for power... hence I figure you go either 16G or 20G, there is no worthwhile in between despite everyone going for the 18G for some reason. <edit: I see Cef33y isn't, though the same still applies but it's more understandable that it's got so little at 4000>

Cool man, would love to see how that setup will go on a 20!!!  There is a disclaimer I always give for EFRs, don't jump to any conclusions of how it is performing until you actually drive it :)

Edited by Lithium

Yeah my bad i was thinking of CRSKmD! Yeah im sure it would be fun but the lag would be horrible for me (coming from a RB25/30 neo with a SS2 .82 rear). I fking love RB20's though and a 260-300kw RB20 is not by any means a slow thing. Sure its no absolute powerhouse but that is heaps of power to go and have fun at a track day/drift day. So i am obviously trying to cook up the best streetable RB20 possible.

17 hours ago, Lithium said:

Cool man, would love to see how that setup will go on a 20!!!  There is a disclaimer I always give for EFRs, don't jump to any conclusions of how it is performing until you actually drive it :)

And drive it i will! This is not going to be a car that lives in the shed, will be driving it daily as much as i can haha. I think i found your mate with the 7163 on the 3sGTE on youtube as well.

FWIW i have purchased a Garage7 IPC and will be using that in this build also. Seems like a very cool but of gear but will be interesting to see how it actually works in the real world.

59 minutes ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Yeah my bad i was thinking of CRSKmD! Yeah im sure it would be fun but the lag would be horrible for me (coming from a RB25/30 neo with a SS2 .82 rear). I fking love RB20's though and a 260-300kw RB20 is not by any means a slow thing. Sure its no absolute powerhouse but that is heaps of power to go and have fun at a track day/drift day. So i am obviously trying to cook up the best streetable RB20 possible.

Yeah, my cars have always been laggy, so don't know what I'm missing, haha

At 240rwkw, its plenty for what I do (drifting). Bonus is I don't use as many tires as other peeps.

 

 

They're saying that the turbo is creeping like hell and they managed to control it via their IPC (and a very soft spring I suppose) instead of porting the shit out of the wastegate.
So yes I think there is room for improvement, beginning by the wastegate porting.

  • 2 weeks later...
8 hours ago, driftnick13 said:

It's on a hub dyno, not sure if that makes a difference.

Nope, I've had a 50trim T3/T04E on the stock manifold a hub dyno with a stock RB20 and it was similar to the GTX on that plot... unless a VERY fast sweep was selected it seems rather laggy for what it is.

  • 2 weeks later...

Turbo purchased and should be here in next 2 weeks. Manifold getting made at the moment :) really wanted to make an exact copy of the Gibson one but there was a few factors stopping it and I ended up going a different route. Manifold is getting made with a 8374 so if i ever go RB26 it will fit perfectly no dramas. Baby little 6758 should fit easily haha.

Cooler piping will be done when turbo turns up.

received_10212408355514650.jpegreceived_10212414287582948.jpegreceived_10212414286222914.jpeg

  • Like 3

A hole in the bonnet should do it. It'll be easier after the first outing, just cut out the burnt area of paint!

Should be a fun car to drive, there's something about revving the crap out of an rb20 that feels good.

A hole in the bonnet should do it. It'll be easier after the first outing, just cut out the burnt area of paint!
Should be a fun car to drive, there's something about revving the crap out of an rb20 that feels good.


I know right! I honestly really do love them. Cant wait to spin this thing as hard as I can :)
Should sound great with that manifold, post some videos up when it's done.


Hopefully mate! The sound was a large part of the reason I went with a manifold like this. Will be going 3" straight through with twin 3.5" tips from Diff back

As I said there was a couple of reasons I couldn't go Gibson style, that was originally what I wanted. But after talks with my fabricator and facing some facts I decided on just going a completely custom manifold. Hopefully i can still get it to sound as close as possible to the Gibson item.

After deciding not to go with the Gibson I though I would try the gts-r manifold route. But decided against that in the end too. I have some tasty up close pics of a gts-r manifold though if you want them [emoji14]

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...