Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R32 GTR dyno numbers pump gas

So this is to help some people out and not let them continue on these crazy pipe dreams lol. First off my car was dynoed at all 4 wheels on as they called it the heart braking dyno and I learned why. So before I post a video here's the specs 

temp out side today maybe in the 70s 

sea level elevation 

1990 Nissan R32 GTR 

42,000 miles 

stock turbos 

Apexi standalone with stock Mafs 

greddy suction Kit 

hks hard piping 

hks Bov 

Arc intercooler 

blitz front pipes 

stock turbos stock manifolds stock dumps 

test pipe to 3.5" hks exhaust 

stock fuel injectors rail pump and pressure 

Greddy Profec the new one 

my car on 93 octane made 325hp and 301 TQ at  18 PSI and then the turbos said hold my beer and watch this. So long story short a custom set of garrets 2860s is gonna be made ported manifolds that are jet coated with coated tomei dumps the new style. I find it hard to believe the stock fuel system supports 450hp now when we where at 75% duty cycle at 18 pounds of boost and 325hp. So hopefully with the custom set of garrets I can get closer to that 400awd numbers but from what my tunning guys said it's gonna be hard with injectors haltech pump rail and stage 2 cams I'll be happy to see high 400s 

IMG_4104.mov

0D668EF1-B86B-4306-8995-A2FB5D88693D.JPG

8384E5C6-EF09-4E7E-BA01-986576A914AE.JPG

 

Link to the dyno video 

 

Edited by Dirty3092
Added a video
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/470007-r32-gtr-dyno-numbers-pump-gas/
Share on other sites

The stock fuel system supports ~450HP AT THE ENGINE.  Your 325HP is measured at the wheels, and it will be some larger number than that at the engine but because you're in the US and we don't trust the at wheels numbers to be comparable to what we know we get here in Oz, I can't tell you what the engine power number might be.  As an example, if you were making 325HP at the wheels on a Dyno Dynamics here in Oz, we'd expect you'd be nearly running out of injector already, you'd be up over 400 HP at the engine.

Stage 2, what about stage 6?

Americans and their stages.. Just as bad as VAG owners with their stage 1, 2, 3 reflashes for 1.2k lol.

Get some better injectors and run a bit more boost. Boost doesn't kill motors, rubbish tunes do.

Also, either throw out your HKS exhaust for a proper 3.5" custom system or cut apart the muffler and remove the internal restrictor, then weld it back together. 

  • Like 1
5 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Stage 2, what about stage 6?

Americans and their stages.. Just as bad as VAG owners with their stage 1, 2, 3 reflashes for 1.2k lol.

Get some better injectors and run a bit more boost. Boost doesn't kill motors, rubbish tunes do.

Also, either throw out your HKS exhaust for a proper 3.5" custom system or cut apart the muffler and remove the internal restrictor, then weld it back together. 

HKS stage 2 cams ? Or is there another name for them.  The reason we didn't throw injectors in it is because I didn't want to spend the 3500 on doing the fuel system all at once. Now where doing 28650-5s with billet wheels ported factory manifolds since everything else is known to crack and the new cast Tomei dumps. The hks exhaust im running now has been fully gutted the silencer has been removed and the can has been gutted and straight piped. I don't know how it is in Australia but everything for the GTRs is a arm and a leg. Second hand parts doesn't really exist. So after all the turbo stuff is done we will retune the car and I'll have to deal with low boost untill it goes back for full fuel upgrade and Maxx Ecu. Then wait some time and upgrade the oil pump oil cooler Greddy intake manifold and HKS stage 2 cams with head studs and a gasket. When I started out with this car I wasn't expecting to spend 15k to make the same amount of power as my 5 series lol 

That'll help. You don't need to spend $3500 on fuel unless you are after monster HP - just new injectors and fuel pump. Stock inlet manifold will be fine. Just dump the twins for a single,  get a Link or something and wind up the boost!

Scroll down this page and have a look at the video: http://www.goodezilla.com/rb26dett-skyline-gtr-single-turbo-vs-twin-turbo

1 hour ago, Dirty3092 said:

HKS stage 2 cams ? Or is there another name for them.  The reason we didn't throw injectors in it is because I didn't want to spend the 3500 on doing the fuel system all at once. Now where doing 28650-5s with billet wheels ported factory manifolds since everything else is known to crack and the new cast Tomei dumps. The hks exhaust im running now has been fully gutted the silencer has been removed and the can has been gutted and straight piped. I don't know how it is in Australia but everything for the GTRs is a arm and a leg. Second hand parts doesn't really exist. So after all the turbo stuff is done we will retune the car and I'll have to deal with low boost untill it goes back for full fuel upgrade and Maxx Ecu. Then wait some time and upgrade the oil pump oil cooler Greddy intake manifold and HKS stage 2 cams with head studs and a gasket. When I started out with this car I wasn't expecting to spend 15k to make the same amount of power as my 5 series lol 

There are 2 different types of HKS step 2 cams, post the lift and duration not stage or step. Both require new valve springs, recesses in the pistons and head clearance around the cams and that's an engine rebuild job.

What were they going to do for this $3500 fuel system upgrade? sounds like someone is ripping you a new one. A walbro 460 fuel pump, some 1000cc - 1600cc injectors and replace the old rubber fuel hose, job done.

Oil pump is an engine out job, the sump needs to be removed and the only way to get to all the bolts on the sump is to remove the gearbox.

As kiwi said get rid of the twins and put a Borg Warner EFR 8374 on there instead.

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

How was your Apexi tuned?  Using the hand controller or loading custom tables?

I have seen 3 R32 GTRs tuned at the same 18psi, with yours being the 4th, all locally in Texas.  And man the results are all over the place...

I got a good chuckle out of that!

By pump gas we meant a car was running on petrol from a typical petrol station without fuel additive or adding higher octane gasoline.  Since many dyno facilities have much higher octane gasoline ready on site to boost / inflate dyno numbers, typically stored in large jerrycans.  So his petrol came from a "pump" station, as opposed to this:

17203085_962896357180634_980249907169029

And octane number 93 was just referring to the slightly better "pump gas" we can get here, because in some areas 91 is the highest octane available, most notably California.

Going back to my previous response, I think OP's tune was very likely done on Apexi's hand held controller due to the limited support we get here.  Even so, I did encounter another R32 running on upgraded GTX Garrett twins with Bosch 1000cc and Link ECU only made 350awhp on 18psi, or 260awkw on 1.24bar.

Edited by TXSquirrel
repost picture

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...