Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

CA18DET Rebuild or engine swap?

Hi All, 

Recently my current CA18DET just blew up (cracked piston rings) and overheated.

Ive got a spare engine lying around with unconfirmed kms (obtained from a previous purchase).

My question is what would be the best path for just getting the car going again (and reliably).

Should I refurbish the engine back to OEM? or just bolt her up with a new head gasket?

Also, if anyone knows who is decent with CA's in Brissy, let me know.

 

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/470485-ca18det-rebuild-or-engine-swap/
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

As one of the rare people still using a CA, you should give it all to me. 

  • What is this car? daily? track? drift? 
  • What do you want to do with this car? 
  • What power do you want from this car? 
  • What's your budget? 

If you have a spare bottom end, you could easily get it inspected by an an engine builder to assess condition. Then make a call about whether you can just slap a head gasket on it, all your old shit and go for gold. 

If it's a track car/you have a decent budget, then you have lots more options (and should do certain things). 

In stock tune, they do not "just blow up" and crack rings. Mine has done 146ks on a stock bottom end and is still being abused on the track with a mild 200rwkw setup. They are strong motors for the age/design. I did replace a head gasket, but that was due to my dodgy tuning learning adventure. 

Find the root cause, if it was heat related then you might have a fuel delivery issue leaning it out or an overboost issue leaning it out. 

Stock ECU? Stock turbo? Lots of questions. 

  • Like 1

:D CAs are pretty cool little nugget. I rebuilt mine in 09, it made 314rwkws on Pump 98 fuel using an old ATR43G4 turbo internally gated.

atr28g4316rwkw.jpg

 

And I sponsored a drive whom also had a built CA18det that made 344rwkws on P100 fuel using the same turbo externally gated.

 

atr28g4344rwkw.jpg 

Lovely numbers I must say

I've decided to go a fully forged bottom end. Keeping the s15 turbo for now. Targets should be around 300hp at break in and after 400+

We figured out after a bit of looking that it was a boost spike that blew the piston rings. 

I think you'll struggle to make 300rwhp on a GT2560 without some reasonable cams and even then I'm not sure.

You could try running it at 20psi+ to get there, but don't expect turbo to live long.

I run the same turbo and they are pretty much out of puff by 16-18psi max. Check the comp maps.

  • Like 1

Yeah I'd agree, at the end of the day its just a number. My main goal is a well balanced and responsive engine. 

Long term a set of good cams, injectors and a decent turbo should do the trick, maybe even an ATR43G4, who knows. 

Plenty of guys (well less and less in fact) here in France runs the CA18 with a gt2560r and the max reliable boost is about 18psi, anything beyond that and the turbo is just breathing hot air up top. Bloody good turbo for smallish/slowish track but it runs out of puff quickly. I agree that you'll not see 300whp with this turbo unless in kill mode, 280whp is more what it can make.

Cheap way for the cam is installing an exhaust cam at the intake to get a bit more lift or a CA16DE intake cam to get a bit more lift and duration. But to be honest don't bother, there is more to be gained with other breathing mode and a smart turbo choice than slapping cams on it.

A mate is using a GT3071 (not sure is it's the cropped 56.5 turbine or the 60mm one) internally gated on his stockish CA. The only upgraded internal parts are metal headgasket and ARP rod bolts. He was running 24 psi (E85) for years (mainly on track) and the oil pump let go last year.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meanwhile, 20+ years ago, I pulled out the 105mm hole saw and went straight down through the inner guard in front of the airbox to get my stormwater pipe cold air intake in. Right behind the two stock holes for the intercooler pipes. Those have no reinforcement (apart from a couple of robust pieces of steel pipe through them!). I feel that the Australian vehicle standards crews put way too much emphasis on "maintaining the crash performance" of cars and not enough consideration of "any crash is a new and wonderful experiment with a random selection of parameters and you will never be able to tell if an extra 80mm hole through some sheet metal caused a significant difference...but if you close your eyes and squint at the whole structure, engage your engineering brain and have a good think about it, you'd have to expect that it would do jack all."
    • You guys are focussing on the wrong part of this post and have headed off on an irrelevant tangent!  Clearly I'm not going to put my most prized physical possession (well it will be once I'm finished it...) on a piece of shit contraption that might fail and crush me or my car!  At no point was that even implied I was trying to buy a butchered P.O.S that some shonky clown had thrown together with a gasless MIG....  Either way I would love to see the build quality of a rotisserie that has failed.  Actually I'd love to see a photo of one that has failed full stop.  Google fails to deliver.  Never happened?? I'll either make one that won't fail or will buy one that wouldn't fail! End Post.....
    • Yeah, if you can't breathe for more than about 2 minutes, you're cooked.
    • Well, all the power should be getting dissipated across the starter motor. Therefore, ideally, the voltage drop across the earth lead should be convincingly close to zero. Certainly you'd want it to be only a volt or so at max, because otherwise that volt doesn't turn up at the starter to do what is required. A car can probably survive a bad enough earth to crank and start with only 9V or so at the starter motor, maybe even a bit less. But you're seeing only 8V at the battery terminals when cranking, so there can't even be that much available over at the starter, which simply won't do. I would have thought that you couldn't pull enough current (with a healthy starter) to make the battery drop to 8V locally. But I was ignoring the possibility that the starter is in fact crook. If it has shorted windings (or maybe the solenoid is borked and shorting to earth) then I guess it could pull a stack of current and not even look like wanting to turn over. So follow the other boys' reccos too. Because they are just as likely at this point.  
    • Depending where the whole gets drilled, and what country/state you're talking about, quite likely not.   Under ole vehicle mod rules in NSW, VSI06 allowed for drilling of holes in "non structural" areas. So you could drill a hole through the inner guard, and not need engineering. You couldn't drill over seams, and it was advised to add extra reinforcing around the hole, as well as something to protect from sharp edges.   Again, it's all about finding the documentation for where the mod is to be done, AND then being able to explain the situation, with the documentation as to why you don't need engineering, with a positive attitude, to any one of the likes eg, police, vehicle inspector, etc.
×
×
  • Create New...