Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay,

Just to let you all know, I'm not going ahead with the group buy.

I'm not really all that happy with the boost control.

It surges a bit, like when it comes on boost it will open the first valve and then the wastegate will open and then boost will drop off a touch and then come back on again.

Also, it will jolt the car as the wastegate opens, which is strange to me....

Boost rises and then as the wastegate opens, and the exhaust note changes, the car jolts forward quite hard. It's very weird, I don't like it.

I think I'm going to get a PowerFC boost up kit for when I install the Power FC and be done with it.

BASS OUT

You set it up wrong, that's why it does that.

You need to close the first valve off a bit...

if you have a wastegate actuator rated at 5psi, your relief valve set to 11 psi, and your regulator set to 10psi, then it will behave badly as you have noticed.

I had the same problem when i first played around with mine, but then I figured out how to re-adjust them, and it works perfectly for me...

hahaha, I knew someone would say that....

1. I REALLY CBF starting a group buy - sorry guys

2. I would feel bad charging people, thus I would not bother installing for people

3. I don't have the time....

I could tell you where to get everything though, to set it up yourself...

look for IMI Norgren Pty Ltd in the white pages. Call and order the following:

  • 1 x R07-200-RNKG Inline 07 ¼ Regulator Relieving 7Bar
  • 1 x V07-200-NNKG Inline 07 ¼ Relief Valve 7 Bar
  • 2 x 2069-02 07 Spring 0.7 Bar (brown)

Maybe ask if they have a spring rated to 1 bar instead of a 0.7 bar spring

then go to enzed (heaps around) and get:

brass York 23151-06 3/8-inch check valve, (or equivalent, as long as the cracking pressure is less than say 2psi)

and hoses + barbed fittings + clamps to suit. Speak to the guys at Enzed about the hoses, fittings and clamps, they should sort you out.

The valves come with their own brackets, and I mounted mine next to the air box in the engine bay.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...