Jump to content
SAU Community

Worn R33 gtst stock LSD symptoms.

vxsr33
 Share

Recommended Posts

vxsr33 Proficient

vxsr33

Posted
Posted

Hi guys,

I'm having an issue on heavy acceleration, notably in second gear. The car loses traction and the rear kicks out, causing the car to snake quite dangerously.

 

I'm assuming the problem is the LSD is worn because it feels as though only one wheel is losing traction therefore causing the car to swerve.

 

Checked suspension for play and everything seems fine, and booking an alignment in this weekend.

 

Car has 258rwkw and im running federal rsr in 235.

 

Any suggestions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
admS15 Grand Master

admS15

Posted
Posted

Does it leave 2 black lines on the road or 1. This will tell you if your LSD is working or not. Mine works fine until the oil gets real hot after multiple laps on circuit. On the street it's fine. Your car wouldn't be kicking out of it was single spinning. My 2c

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GeeDog Experienced

GeeDog

Posted
Posted

There is a widely held belief that the V in VLSD is for Viscous - I actually believed this for a time. I now know that it stands for Virtual - it isn't a real LSD, just a pretend one. When the going gets tough it isn't much better than an open diff.

As Molly would say, do yourself a favour and get a real LSD. You'll wonder how you survived without it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
vxsr33 Proficient

vxsr33

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks fellas, i know the VLSD is shit, will just have to save up for a nismo 1.5 or something

From what i have seen it is only leaving one line so it's no good.

Bill if you reckon that the kicking out is unrelated then hopefully the alignment will fix it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
admS15 Grand Master

admS15

Posted
Posted

1 line, no good. The kicking out will be when the second wheel does actually get some drive and will be making it unpredictable. I've also been thinking about a 1.5 way but my vlsd is still doing ok,paints nice 11's on the asphalt. Eventually I will make the switch though. #Nismolife

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • V35_Paul
      Thinking of getting a Q50 300hp and just tuning it instead of getting the Q50 Red or 400R

      By V35_Paul · Posted

    • joshuaho96
      PRP RB26 cast block + head prototype running

      By joshuaho96 · Posted

      Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • V35_Paul
      2020 Nissan Skyline 400R V37/Infiniti Q50 RS insurance in NSW

      By V35_Paul · Posted

      https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • V35_Paul
      Head Unit Wiring Diagram

      By V35_Paul · Posted

      Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...