Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb20det s13 runs perfect but slower than a civic


Tortise240
 Share

Recommended Posts

Rb20det s13 runs perfect but slower than a civic

Hey everybody, i just made this account because ive been browsing this site everytime i need to learn something about my engine(rb20det) and the info yall got here is incomparable to any forums in the US where its just a huge internet argument. With that being said i havent found anything on this forum that adresses the issues im having so here goes. 

I have a rb20det swap in my s13 running everything stock, its holding boost at 10psi, the wideband reads 11-12 on boost and around 15 at idle, the timing is set at 15* and everything appears to be running perfect except a little idle fluctuation from 680-780rpm and sometimes i need to hit the gas when cranking to start it. The major issue im having is my car is slower than my honda accord but seems to be running fine, i can feel the turbo spool and the boost comes on but its still very very slow. Any help would be greatly appreciated 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new V6 Honda Accord has over 200kw IIRC, whereas an RB20DET had 158kw, and that's when it was brand new, not 20+ years old.

Your question is pretty vague bud without more details, but really it isn't hard to imagine your RB20 being slower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like it behaves like its n/a. I sure u got a turbo in there?

jokes aside check if you don't have a boost leak or if ur turbo is dead. All i can think off. And AFM like nizmo_man said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@drunken0elf @iruvyouskyrine @niZmO_Man Timing is at 15* all spark plugs look perfect sandy color and coils look good. AFM reads 11-12 on boost and 14-15.7 at idle or low throttle. My boost gauge says it holds 10psi which sounds about right for the stock turbo. Could there be a boost leak or busted turbo even though the gauge reads 10psi? It really does preform like an NA engine but it holds 10psi on boost and about -18 vaccum at idle. It seems to rev slow under load as well, maybe driveshaft issue? There is a clunk from the rear sometimes when i shift or hit the throttle hard which i believe is my center support bearing but i wasnt under the impression that it would cause a massive power loss like this

Edited by Tortise240
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tortise240 said:

@drunken0elf @iruvyouskyrine @niZmO_Man Timing is at 15* all spark plugs look perfect sandy color and coils look good. AFM reads 11-12 on boost and 14-15.7 at idle or low throttle. My boost gauge says it holds 10psi which sounds about right for the stock turbo. Could there be a boost leak or busted turbo even though the gauge reads 10psi? It really does preform like an NA engine but it holds 10psi on boost and about -18 vaccum at idle. It seems to rev slow under load as well, maybe driveshaft issue? There is a clunk from the rear sometimes when i shift or hit the throttle hard which i believe is my center support bearing but i wasnt under the impression that it would cause a massive power loss like this

The clunk you've described is likely just the centre bearing of the driveshaft. So no, it wouldn't cause a power issue, but yes it should be sorted eventually.

It's strange that you're holding boost, timing is good and AFR's are fine. Quite a conundrum. Maybe you could get a video of the car accelerating for us? Hard to identify further, for me anyway (but I'm no mechanic lol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@inmaniac Quite the conundrum indeed ill get a video up soon as i can, it would help alot to get a second opinion on how it revs under load, seem sluggish to me but maybe thats just because its so slow 

@Dose Pipe Sutututu Ima go check those knock sensors i hope its not that though cuz rb parts are hard to come by in the shitty ol UsA lol

@vxsr33 Dyno time is too expensive where im located, and its a DET hence the issue with it feeling slower than a ka24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Dose Pipe Sutututu i dont have the time or money for a nistune at the moment but as soon as i can send them my ecu ill get that board installed and tuned. Thanks for the reccomendation i didnt know about nistune before but it looks like the best tuning option by far...cant beat what is essentially a standalone for 500$! Knock sensors looked fine physically but i dont know how to check without nistune

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just ran a compression test and with a cold motor it pulled 125-130 psi in every cylinder. #3 spark plug came out black and was gapped to .6 maybe it wasnt getting enough spark due to improper gap? I double checked the gap for the rest and they were all smaller than .8 but only #3 looked fouled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...