Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How to tell an auto conversion

New to forum so excuse if this is the wrong spot. I have a  r34 gtt and was recently replacing my radiator. The old (standard) radiator had two lines looped from the radiator to (what i think is) the powersteering cooler and back to the radiator essentially doing nothing. Now can someone tell me if its actually an auto trans cooler thats been left behind from an auto conversion and how do i tell if its been converted to manual.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/471968-how-to-tell-an-auto-conversion/
Share on other sites

I imagine the build plate should have some indication of whether it's Manual or Auto from factory.

Example: (RE4R01B is the auto trans code, not sure what the manual code is, someone else may be able to help there)

4.JPG

Yep the blue build plate will tell you what kind of Trans was original. Also the fuses under the battery may have been shorted out to simulate Park for starting - there may be a gear position indicator on the cluster although it could have been blanked out.

If still using factory ECU, then the auto ECU will happily run the manual car.  You can tell if it's an auto ECU from the part number, or from opening it up and finding the TCU module on the main board.  ECU is unlikely to have been changed in a manual conversion.

The other is the diff ratio.  Manuals are 4.11.  Autos are 4.083.  Unlikely to have been changed in a manual conversion.

On the topic of coolers......the R34 PS cooler is a small core, about 150x200mm or perhaps a bit smaller.  The transmission cooler (if it has a separate core) is larger.  Neither of these have anything to do with the radiator.  The PS cooler only has hoses with PS fluid in them.  The auto cooler on has hoses with tranny fluid in it.  If you have a core that has hoses that pass through the bottom tank of the radiator.....I'm not completely sure what to make of that.  Would have been easier to just remove the extra core and the hoses.  If you cannot find a core for the PS cooler, then you really should have one.  Consider re-instating it.

On 9/11/2017 at 9:52 AM, GTSBoy said:

.  The transmission cooler (if it has a separate core) is larger.  Neither of these have anything to do with the radiator.  The PS cooler only has hoses with PS fluid in them.  The auto cooler on has hoses with tranny fluid in it.  If you have a core that has hoses that pass through the bottom tank of the radiator.....I'm not completely sure what to make of that.  Would have been easier to just remove the extra core and the hoses.  If you cannot find a core for the PS cooler, then you really should have one.  Consider re-instating it.

Auto fluid passes through a heat exchanger in the bottom of the radiator.

1 minute ago, KiwiRS4T said:

Auto fluid passes through a heat exchanger in the bottom of the radiator.

My point was that if he has a separate core that is connected to the auto's original HX in the bottom tank.....then I didn't know what to make of that, because it sounds like a cludge.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 馃槑 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
    • 'sif the error will be that low!
    • I do know where there is a fair few 馃槈
  • Create New...