Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

JEM reckon my car will make 350ish when i go back to E85, after i fix a couple of issues (that i told you about the other day Luke)
Realistically if you want 400 -9's will struggle as well...you'll either need -5's or a nice single. considering a precision turbo is cheaper than -5's id just do that, get someone to fab you a manifold. 
In saying that i'm weighing up my options for my next turbo, because im a stubborn flamin mongrel and a but of a "purist" ill be sticking with 2 turbos....
If the motor is healthy you should be able to push around 350kw on E85 with the -7's. Spend the extra cash on the diffs, and enjoy. 
350-400KW, Quaife front Diff, modified transfer case, nismo rear diff=ultimate street car IMO
 
I thought 5s wpuld be much higher on e85, considering theure 380+ on 98???
4 minutes ago, luke gtr said:
23 minutes ago, Anfanee said:
JEM reckon my car will make 350ish when i go back to E85, after i fix a couple of issues (that i told you about the other day Luke)
Realistically if you want 400 -9's will struggle as well...you'll either need -5's or a nice single. considering a precision turbo is cheaper than -5's id just do that, get someone to fab you a manifold. 
In saying that i'm weighing up my options for my next turbo, because im a stubborn flamin mongrel and a but of a "purist" ill be sticking with 2 turbos....
If the motor is healthy you should be able to push around 350kw on E85 with the -7's. Spend the extra cash on the diffs, and enjoy. 
350-400KW, Quaife front Diff, modified transfer case, nismo rear diff=ultimate street car IMO
 

I thought 5s wpuld be much higher on e85, considering theure 380+ on 98???

-5's will make 450+ on E85

Do you need Plazmaman Comp Series 100mm p0rn cooler? I always do breast pry for SAU members
I hope those aren't CNG injectors [emoji4]
 

For the 7s, stock cooler should do me.
Think 100 would be too large.
As thinking about the 80 series.....

And injectors were 2nd hand, so not 100%
Just now, Piggaz said:

For how long? Not very ?

 

realistically, a set of -5's should be pegged at 410 ish for trackwork. Heat, heat, heat.

Oh yeah i was more talking about street work. TBH for a track dedicated car a single is the way to go 100%. 

22 minutes ago, luke gtr said:

Have heard of 7s making 380 on e85.
Thats why I though the 9s may just touch the 400.

380? f**k that would be pushing them hard... on a 2.6?

2 hours ago, luke gtr said:


For the 7s, stock cooler should do me.
Think 100 would be too large.
As thinking about the 80 series.....

And injectors were 2nd hand, so not 100%

Take a photo of the injectors, tbh if they are CNG ones sell them ASAP... they're not worth your time.

400 kw at the track is -5's. Minimum. Can't expect -7's/-9's or whatever to last at high 300's at the track. Shit will be glowing red, melting. Kinda have to "relax" everything considering the punishment. 

"Intune's" R33/RB30/-5's/e85 which was making 424 rwkw lasted 6 laps at Sandown, rear turbo popped. Pulled them off and it's was totally rooted.

My -5 setup lasted 2 trackdays (which they were turned down) and no more than 5000 road kms. Rear turbo was cactus.

A street car making "x" with everything wound up ain't going to last long hauling ass up mountain straight lap after lap.

Forget -9's buttplug's. If you want 400, you NEED -5's at a minimum.

  • Like 2

Twins are gay, single twin scroll, twin gates (or single but split to the gate) done deal.

Look at BMW when they started to have a play with turbos on their inline 6 on the N54 motor.. they though "twins are sick, twins for response".. yeah nah bro, not even a new chassis or generation and they fixed up their cock ups with a N55 motor and slapped a single twin scroll. It took them all of 3~4 years to realise twins on an inline motor was stupid.

You GT-R boys have had since 1989 and still get it wrong.

Paul was a homo cnut too.. but after years of me whinging (and others) he became a man.

#truestory lol

BTW.. I voted YES.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's interesting seeing everyone talk about what level of risk they are happy to tolerate.  Building a GTR always has a level of risk, you could be that lucky guy that drops 20k on the engine build alone and still has the thing go pop on the dyno. Life is fun like that.  The way I see it, the thing is a toy to be enjoyed. I'd be happy to turn up the power on stock motor and limit the risk with sensible tuning and engine protection. If it still goes pop, it is what it is. The car isn't a daily driver so it can happily sit while a plan is made to sort it out.  Given this thing will be a street car only, I really feel it's worth the (relatively small if managed well) risk to turn the power up to around 350KW on e85.  I don't think anyone getting into the skyline game now is doing it out of logic. Surely it is a purely emotional decision so I'm not sure how important it is to think about the engine build logically. The heart wants what it wants.  @joshuaho96 little note for Josh, I run my 525 pump flat out all the time and through the factory lines without any issues. (excluding the melting connectors, that's sorted now. we'll pretend it never happened lol)
    • But the Nexus S3 is very expensive and won't be as purpose-built for the application as a separate electronic boost controller :^) More seriously my pet issue here would be that the Walbro 525 running at 100% duty cycle is going to require more FPR than the stock setup can handle. I'm also pretty sure from what I've seen elsewhere you might want to slow down the pump regardless unless you're going to come up with some way of upsizing the fuel lines coming from the fuel tank. Factory 8mm fuel line doesn't actually flow very much if you want to keep pressure drop down between the fuel pump outlet and FPR. If you really want to "keep it simple" I would run only as much pump as you need and source a fuel pump controller to slow down the pump in the vain hope of being able to run stock-style FPRs which are pretty dinky. Or just use the HICAS lines and it should be mostly fine. OP should also really think hard about what profile they'd want out of the turbo. My pet choice here would be the G1 profile rather than anything higher power but YMMV. I already think ~stock turbo lag is pretty bad so I don't want to make it worse. In "gentle canyon cruising" I found that I spent a lot of time around 4-4.5k RPM. I also recommend DIYing labor if you're detail-oriented enough. Costs are high for labor + if you do it yourself you can be your own quality control.
    • GTSBoy is again on the money. My actual advice? Sell the car. (really). For what it's worth as is, you can sidegrade into something much better. If you care about function then this is the actual move. If you want a Skyline to perform, set aside about $100K to do it. This is NOT a typo. You will see right away these are two very different mindsets. Realistically we're talking full restomod for any Skyline still kicking around. Have an honest think about which one you are.. and what you want to do, and how much you want to invest in this (with no return).
    • I promise there will be no chance of replacing the rad support....  It is barely twisted and it's way more likely to just be driven around with a slightly twisty support. As long as the headlight can be bolted in there then no harm no foul lol. The reo may need to be un-bent a little but truth be told if it all somewhat lines up and is hidden when the car is assembled the level of f**ks will be 0.0 
    • this thread delivers, once again Skyline owners, our cars spend more time off the road than on the road  
×
×
  • Create New...