Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

RB30/26 Into 1996 S2 R33 Gtst

Gidday Peoples. 

I've been a manner here for a while and never really said anything. 

But now I shall change that. 

I own a 1996 R33 Rb25det Powered Gtst with 444.4 RWHP @ 19.5 PSI. 

 

But I have excessive soil vapour coming out if my Tappet cover breathers and now out my exhaust pipe. 

 

I have recently purchased a RB26/30 THAT only had a mild tune and 400 RWHP.

And I want to put it into my r33. I know I will have to fabricate my own engine mounts and that 999.9% of the sensors will work from the factory r33 harness. 

 

I need to know if there is any little traps that fought people out when they attempted this conversion. 

 

What am I missing. 

I have spent about 4 or so weeks researching this and frankly there isn't much about it at all anywhere. There is heaps on doing the build of a rb26-26/30 

But bugger all about putting it into a car. 

If you knowbof any threads or pages or even YouTube vids please send me the link. 

 

Thanks In Advance. 

Pat

20170822_102615.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/472003-rb3026-into-1996-s2-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

Gidday PranK

 

Cheers for the welcome note. 

Yeah I'm sure someone can help. 

Getting depressing sitting on my back veranda looking at it and not being able to go for a run in it. 

 

And driving my patrol (As nice and comfortable as it is) is not a very fast car. Never tried to give it a foot full either. I drive it like it's ment to be driven. Low revs slow corners and a slow ish take off. 

 

The R33 on the other hand.

But 444 RWHP on a stock motor is a good effort. But I built it around the fact that i will want the Rb26/30 in there so twin Proflo Pumps 1/2" fuel lines 2200cc I.D injectors ect ect. 

 

And what better way to start then making sure I'm well informed. 

 

Anyway Take care mate and thanks again. 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm hoping I just don't have to do an engine rebuild NOW. Doesn't mean I won't do it at some point. I think a plus point is that the car presumably ran on or close to stock power nearly all it's life so far. Only the Owner I bought it from actually increased power with a standalone ECU and blew the OEM turbos. And after it got thee 2860s it wasn't driven an awful lot either.   That is what I meant. With the twins coming on so late (4500-5000rpm) I hope the rods won't want to exit the block prematurely. And it still being a 26 means the torque curve isn't gonna hike up all that much.   It didn't blow up on the dyno when they tuned it to 500ish crank. So I suppose it'll be okay for now. They did put a Tomei head gasket on first though which did not seal at all, and they redid it with a Cometic one. Which I hope won't be my water leak.   Mainly anything oil. So far all it has is the N1 pump, oil restrictor and a filter relocation kit with a cooler.
    • 15000? ish? Something like that anyway. It wasn;t so much a wear as a tear that then spread. Might have lasted a lot longer if not bothered by just one incident, whatever it was. I took a punt. They are really comfortable and do a good job of holding. My daughter HATED it when I first put them in, and probably still does now. She has sensory issues and hates the way they are all up your business. I'm 197cm and 95kg. Not fat or particularly wide, and the XL size seat is the rigth fit. If I was any fatter it would start to get too snug. Any skinnier and you'd possibly want the smaller width.
    • Mrs rs focus came factory with recaro cs  sportsters in it and they a pain in the ass to get in and out of with the really high bolsters, once you were in them they were one of the most comfortable seats I have ever sat in
    • The NA 2.5 has very little torque. You won't feel much. Those trannies are also a million years old now and it could well be f**ked. First generation electronically controlled autos will often refuse to kick down, ete, etc, depending on what's wrong with them.
    • Yes, but no but yes but no. Those "it's fine up to 500HP" rules and everything else like it were all determined back when the cars were 10 years old. As they are now 30 years old.....what do you reckon the chances of something shitting the bed are? I'd say they are much higher now than they used to be. You might be lucky. You might be unlucky. Spin the wheel and find out. Yeah, nah. It's actually exactly the opposite. Making boost early and having heaps of torque able to be generated right in the middle of the rev range will do more to damage an engine than having to rev it high to make the power. Think about the load on the conrods, bearings, etc, to make 400HP at 4000 rpm, vs 400 HP at 6500 rpm. So someone has already "let the Nissan out" which is how we describe the increased chance of a fiddled with engine to have had something done wrongly. Many more engines that have been opened die than stock ones do - even if you into consideration how they are treated wrt power levels and the like. Again, not saying that yours will definitely have been put back together by a moron. But the possibility does exist. It's still a lottery. Spin the wheel. What weakspots?
×
×
  • Create New...