Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As the title reads, how do u reckon u would go getting 250rwkw with the stock airbox??

Does anyone have any before and after dyno results??experiences??thoughts??

Best I have seen was 225 rwkw with a Pipercross panel filter in the standard airbox on an R34 GTT. Even that required changing the pipework from the AFM to the turbo as it kept getting sucked closed, that was with the standard air filter though. :)

I'm not sure how different the GTR's airbox is compared to the GTT's amd others... but I chose to remove the HKS Pods, and re-fit the Factory GTR airbox with a KN Filter.. We still got around the 310-320kw @rear wheels, and to add to that we are still using the factory dump pipes off the turbo and stock GTR cat??

I'd be interested on what you think SK about that, coz I know you think otherwise.

:)

Easy. :) IMO one thing I think people tend to forget when looking at the standard components of the later model Skylines is they have been building a similar design for how long now? You can imagine how much R&D has gone into the RB26 and RB25 over the years. Look at cars like the Mines GTR with it's standard air box. That car is one mean machine!

I'm not sure how different the GTR's airbox is compared to the GTT's amd others... but I chose to remove the HKS Pods, and re-fit the Factory GTR airbox with a KN Filter.. We still got around the 310-320kw @rear wheels, and to add to that we are still using the factory dump pipes off the turbo and stock GTR cat??

I'd be interested on what you think SK about that, coz I know you think otherwise.

:D

I don't know what you mean mesh :angel:, the standard GTR cat is good thing, much better than a GTST or compliance cat. I have 2 cars using the stock airbox but with Pipercross panel filters. :) I could argue with you about why the Pipercross filters are better than the K&N, if you need a :fight!:

So that just leaves dumps, as you know I prefer split dumps, but not the HKS shorty style, I prefer mine with longer separation. Not because they give more max power, but because I get better average power out of them. But that's just my opinion. :)

I could argue with you about why the Pipercross filters are better than the K&N

Hi Sk, I like the K&N product. Whats with these Pipercross Filters that gets you so warm inside? :confused: Do you think that the oil used on the k&n filter stuffs the afm? I'm interested to know if you've seen any back to back comparisons with a lightly oiled k&n vs paper element with respect to the amount of air they can flow?

Hi Sk, I like the K&N product. Whats with these Pipercross Filters that gets you so warm inside? :confused: Do you think that the oil used on the k&n filter stuffs the afm? I'm interested to know if you've seen any back to back comparisons with a lightly oiled k&n vs paper element with respect to the amount of air they can flow?

Hi Ben, the advantage the Pipercross design has is the multiple density and thus the vastly greater amount of surface area to hold particles (dust, dirt, grit etc). The differing densities enable the filter to hold different size particles in the most appicable density foam and still let the air flow around them. The single density filters suffer from blockage very quikly in comparison, one big dirt particle completely blocks off that spot on the filter.

Single density means that all particles (regardless of their size) must be trapped on the surface of the filter. The Pipercros design allows the larger particles to be trapped in the least dense foam, the next sized particles in the lessor dense and the very fine in the highest density.

I have heard all the counter arguements, stuff like the convoluted design means that there is more surface area. But I have examined enough panel filters to know that the troughs do all the work, and the rest of the convolutes block each other from the airflow. Next time you pull out your K&N have a look where all the dirt is.

The Pipercross filter oil has flame retardent in its composition, something that others could learn from.

As for back to back tests, I have done a few. When the filters are all brand new they flow pretty much the same, but after a few thousand k's the Pirercross design shits on them all, it looses nothing.

So that's why I prefer them :)

Thanks SK - as always a thorough explanation. So the pipercross is foam, using similar principals to the two stage foam filters used on trailbikes etc Looks like i'll be recharging the K&N quite frequently then - if its starts to disintergrate i've always got that 1,000,000 km warranty! lol. - Do you think that the BelRay oil as used in trailbikes would do the trick when i recharge or stick with the K&N Oil? I have a large bottle of the BelRay on the shelf.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update: I got the magnet out. I bought 3 different flexible magnetic reach tools, but none of them worked. The magnet on the tip was all less than 2lbs of force, so i had to buy a special cylindrical magnet that had a pull force of 9lbs.  The magnet finally came in the mail yesterday, so i got under the car to get to work. The super strong magnet isn't that long, so i only have about 1 finger pinch lengths to hold it. I was so scared when i was going in the hole, that the 9lb magnet would just fly away inside the oil pan never to be seen again, but i had my butt cheeks clenched and finger gripped on that thing so tight, i managed to get it to suck the other magnet out.  It was a victory for me last night.         
    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
×
×
  • Create New...