Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sadly I'm gunna be a negative Nancy on this 1. Sounds like it was in 3rd gear for a kick off lol 780hp at 99mph. The run was barely a few seconds long. (Which could be operator getting scared of it jumping outta the dyno) so possibly a + not a - there... 

Also it's on a dynojet so you can literally pull 15% off those numbers "for straya dyno figures" so 780hp is more like 660whp on our shores. So it's a sub 500rwkw result from a set of 985kw snails?

Would love to know what fuel and boost that was on!

Sadly I'm gunna be a negative Nancy on this 1. Sounds like it was in 3rd gear for a kick off lol 780hp at 99mph. The run was barely a few seconds long. (Which could be operator getting scared of it jumping outta the dyno) so possibly a + not a - there... 
Also it's on a dynojet so you can literally pull 15% off those numbers "for straya dyno figures" so 780hp is more like 660whp on our shores. So it's a sub 500rwkw result from a set of 985kw snails?
Would love to know what fuel and boost that was on!



And to add to the bullshit, it's on a VR38 not a VQ hahah so yeh, not so great...

Surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but the original post that video is from specifically mentions that it's during tuning - ie, that's not a full power run.  I'm not sure why they didn't show an "all in" run, or say what the final power was but the implication from the guy whose car it is has very much been that this isn't the power it's capable of.

31 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but the original post that video is from specifically mentions that it's during tuning - ie, that's not a full power run.  I'm not sure why they didn't show an "all in" run, or say what the final power was but the implication from the guy whose car it is has very much been that this isn't the power it's capable of.

Interesting..... Wonder why the secrecy? Kind of a bit dumb to post a vid like that then hide the results? 

Maybe it's a Skola tune? ?

  • Haha 1
Surprised it hasn't been mentioned yet, but the original post that video is from specifically mentions that it's during tuning - ie, that's not a full power run.  I'm not sure why they didn't show an "all in" run, or say what the final power was but the implication from the guy whose car it is has very much been that this isn't the power it's capable of.


Yeah good point, would be great to know what boost, fuel and gear that run was done with and a look at the graph with rpm.. hopefully we'll start to see more results with that crucial info soon.
3 minutes ago, BakemonoRicer said:

Meh... buy a G series and still get clouted by the whole EFR crew.'

you guys go right ahead 

I stuck up for it and am pretty much the ambassador for EFRs here lol

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
On 3/29/2018 at 7:18 AM, LaurelPWR said:

 


Yeah good point, would be great to know what boost, fuel and gear that run was done with and a look at the graph with rpm.. hopefully we'll start to see more results with that crucial info soon.

 

Looking through the various Instagram comments; G25-660's 0.72AR, VP Racing Fuel, AMS Alpha 4.0L BC stroker VQ, high comp JE Pistons, nitrous, Motec M150.

812rwhp and 676rwtq @ 22psi

According to Garretts cattledog there are or will be T4 twin scroll integral gate turbine housings available for the G series .

If you buy or make a twin entry T3 to T4 adapter plate you may get one on a Skyline manifold .

If Garrett are smart they'll make T3 flanged housings available , like EFR did .

On 5/21/2018 at 3:12 AM, etang789 said:

Still no one has put this on a RB26 in a twin setup?

I wouldn't hold my breath, I certainly haven't heard any hints of anyone doing such a build and given they won't realistically be bolt on options I'd say most would go for known and easier/cheaper to fit combinations.  

There are VERY few dyno results out the for the G25s, and so far I've seen nothing worth really writing home about.  The most indicative of any potential I've seen is an EJ25 powered Subaru with a .72a/r G25-660 on it putting down a bit over 500whp (~370wkw) on a Mainline roller dyno at 26psi with full boost coming in in the mid/low 4000rpm range.    It's decent, but nothing to put the EFRs on notice.

15 hours ago, Lithium said:

I wouldn't hold my breath, I certainly haven't heard any hints of anyone doing such a build and given they won't realistically be bolt on options I'd say most would go for known and easier/cheaper to fit combinations.  

There are VERY few dyno results out the for the G25s, and so far I've seen nothing worth really writing home about.  The most indicative of any potential I've seen is an EJ25 powered Subaru with a .72a/r G25-660 on it putting down a bit over 500whp (~370wkw) on a Mainline roller dyno at 26psi with full boost coming in in the mid/low 4000rpm range.    It's decent, but nothing to put the EFRs on notice.

True that Im wishfully thinking this may come out this year before I bite the bullet for EFR

On 5/23/2018 at 3:36 AM, etang789 said:

True that Im wishfully thinking this may come out this year before I bite the bullet for EFR

They are out, just doesn't seem like a lot of people have tried them - or at least boasted about their results so far.  It's probably too early to draw any conclusions one way or another from what little info is out there, it feels like there is potential there.

The odds are there are a lot of people like you, who are interested and thinking about it but want someone else to try it first - which is very reasonable... but also means there is probably not much point holding your breath.

The "next size up" G-series are likely to be more interesting to everyone, it was an interesting choice going for the baby size first.

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like the Integrated Motorsport Time Attack R34 GTR is going to twin Garrett new series turbos from a single EFR (9180 from memory) shall be interesting to see the differences, obviously custom everything, manifolds etc....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @GTSBoy i tried to jumper the wires and got the steering wheel light to come on which is right under the gear indication but that still doesnt come on.  Can it be an issue with my cluster?
    • Given that you have seen the dash indicator work briefly, then it would seem like you have a simple wiring problem. What happens when you simply jumper the wires on the "steering wheel switch"?
    • Yesterday's day in review: All the wiring to the lights up the front how I want it, is ran, terminated, and all to length. The only lighting up front I haven't finished is the side indicators, as I need to get to the partly cutup factory loom, and find the plugs for them. Interesting note, the side indicators use the exact same plug that's in the doors for something else that I don't remember what it is... So that plug better be careful...   Power steering solenoid, on the R33 is variable, and from memory PWM. The Ford's control from the docs I have so far, is it's just a on or off control. So I'm not sure it's what I want, and in any case, power steering running, but at its heaviest (solenoid off) is likely what I'll want anyway, so I'm not yet touching it at all. All the wiring I can complete so far, is done. There are 3 wires I need to make a plug for at the ECU, and these are just for the vehicle speed sensor, of which I need to get a T5 from an AU, so I can use its output that has the speed sensor on it. (My car doesn't have ABS, otherwise I'd set it up to use one of the ring gears on that). I need to buy new headlight globes and front parker globes, otherwise I could show photos of lights working. Current fuel lines in and out on this motor are "5/16". I'll order hardline, and some AN fittings for that, and I just need to 100% check fuel line size at the tank end, to get the ends for it. I'm also looking at a few options for the banjo bolts to AN fittings for the power steering rack. I'll pull the reservoir off the Barras PS pump. There's an off the shelf fitting for that pump for a -10 AN feed, and it'll use a 16mm to dash -6 an outlet to feed the rack. I'll be making my own power steering reservoir, I'm going through the thought process at the moment of how I'll run the baffles, and I need to research another idea for it too.
    • Two inlet runners changes the engines characteristics requiring less fuel to make torque at different points in the rev range. The smaller diameter inlet runners on the DET increases air flow speed, which improves atomisation of fuel, particularly in low load/idle for better burn, and in specific areas of the engine, (areas you would use when driving normally) increases the efficiency. All of those items change how efficient the engine is at different speeds. The changes on the neo help slightly to improve emissions where it matters. The overall improvements won't be the likes of going from an engine built in the 70s to an engine built in the 2000s, it's just a small step. But still leaves it the RB with the best chance of improvement.   As for your comment about the whole using a cat to not need to worry about those gases. Two things, no system is 100% perfect. It won't eliminate everything. So reduce the quantity you put into it, you still reduce the output. Two, make that system do less work, and it's likely to survive a little bit longer. Funnily enough to, one trick employed to get cats up to temp, AND to drastically reduce emissions before they get up to temp, is to reduce ignition timing.
    • Maybe I should have written that a bit better lol. I did come 8th last in English at school during the HSC, ironically spent 2 decades reading/writing specifications and contracts in IT 😂
×
×
  • Create New...