Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G30 turbine flow :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G30turbineflowmap

 

G35 turbine flow :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35turbineflowmap

The compressor flow chart :

 

770 :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G30-770comp-map

 

The 900 one :

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35-900comp-map

 

and finally the 1050 one :

 

Les turbo garrett G series - Page 4 G35-1050comp-map

All were taken from ATP website so I consider these as legit but still take these with a grain of salt as they were not officially released.

6 hours ago, R_34 said:

 

All were taken from ATP website so I consider these as legit but still take these with a grain of salt as they were not officially released.

Understood, and very much appreciated - thanks for sharing - that's awesome.

I'm pretty confident they are legit, btw.  Just probably weren't meant to be released yet

I've had a quick play with that data, and if I am looking at it right - the 1.01a/r G30 hotside is very comparable to the 1.05a/r EFR8374 hotside which puts things into perspective.


The .83a/r G30 hotside falls slightly short of the .82a/r GT35 hotside in flow.   I think Garrett have chosen some very nice spread of options with this range.

  • 4 weeks later...
On 12/04/2019 at 4:41 PM, Phat_Toni said:

The g25 660 with the 0.92 looks comparable to the GT3076r but seems to have the edge in turbine flow, compressor flow and spool. 

g25 660 0.92 from ATS 

6boost mani

 

I saw a post on Sinco NZ's Instagram page which made me think of you, how is your build going?  Did you end up going Sinco for the manifold or is there someone else doing similar?

image.png.676e27afa0879be80102e5c2f3a98f37.png

1 hour ago, Skylineusa said:

This page is gold with great information. Thank you guys! Would running twin 550 be a worthwhile combo? 

That's a very open ended question.  For what power target and on what kind of setup??  Do you have the budget and inclination to do all the fabrication to do twin 550s? (it's not something you'd do on stock manifolds/location). 

It is the kind of setup which to justify would need a pretty solid engine spec, basically its a 1000hp turbo setup so expect the kind of lag that would come with one and expect to need to do the kind of engine and transmission development needed to support it.   If you are looking at making the typical kind of power that people go for with low mount twins then no, imho it is not worth doing.

5 minutes ago, Phat_Toni said:

I think this car was mentioned earlier in the thread. Gives a good idea as what to expect from 2 of these things....

 

It's worth nothing a couple of things he says which contradict each other, he implies it spools 500rpm better than the EFR9180 but then also says its all in between 6000-7000rpm which on a 2.8 is... umm... much laggier than any EFR9180 I've heard of.

It's been previously said that it's got a 500rpm wider powerband as the 660s hold on (unsurprisingly) to much higher rpm than the EFR9180 and other turbo setups they ran on it, so if you are willing to rev it to 9000+rpm then it offers the potential to give a broad delivery - as long as you aren't hoping for things to happen earlier in the rev range.

Be great to get some more data points from that car.  

 

The twin G25-550 intrigues me as well.  They do the internal gate T2 .49 which screams bolt me on an RB26.

I've be told by a seller its not a bolt on affair though. I was not given any details other than you have a 30 year old car "dude" as to why. 

The cost of them makes it a serious investment and a risk you end up with a street pig.

If not and they make 900-1000fwhp with amazing spool  ..... all the glory is yours  ......

 

When they released the spec sheet on the g25 I looked at them real hard. The problem I saw is they are longer than the stock turbo. There just doesn't seem to be horizontal room for them. Granted this is based off the spec sheet and not trial and error.

If we could slant them 20° from horizontal they might fit but you can't do that and expect the snail to live.

Sorry Lithium, you are correct. I should have gone into a little more detail. I was thinking for quick spool, which I understand by your reply, and looking at the map, would not be a good marriage. It looks like I will wait for the 770s to come out, and go that route.

Hypertune makes twin manifolds for the G25s, if anyone is going that route. My car is more street than track, so I really do not need that much power.

 

Edited by Skylineusa
9 hours ago, Skylineusa said:

It looks like I will wait for the 770s to come out, and go that route.

Hypertune makes twin manifolds for the G25s, if anyone is going that route. My car is more street than track, so I really do not need that much power.

I hope you mean a single 770? :o

  • Haha 1

Yeh its interesting.  

I am in the process of getting rid of my HKS F-con rubbish in favour of a Link g4+ and upgrading my trigger system and fuel system at the same time.

Once done the G30-770 be on the next list to replace the -5's.

So sooner they come out the better so someone else test for me.

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...