Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Phat_Toni said:

Very interested to see how the G30 based turbos compare to the GT30 based turbos in terms of response. Im expecting response somewhere between GT30 and GT35 in comparable housing sizes...time will tell

A mate is going to be trying a Gen2 GTX3076R with 1.01a/r hotside and a G-series turbo for comparisons sake, not 100% sure which but it seems like it could end up being a G30-770 with .83a/r hotside (most similar flow rating to the 1.01 GT30) on a built SR20VE.   That should be a relatively interesting comparison.

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 5
4 hours ago, Lithium said:

A mate is going to be trying a Gen2 GTX3076R with 1.01a/r hotside and a G-series turbo for comparisons sake, not 100% sure which but it seems like it could end up being a G30-770 with .83a/r hotside (most similar flow rating to the 1.01 GT30) on a built SR20VE.   That should be a relatively interesting comparison.

I'd like to hear those results... 

On 18/07/2019 at 12:11 PM, Lithium said:

I saw a post on Sinco NZ's Instagram page which made me think of you, how is your build going?  Did you end up going Sinco for the manifold or is there someone else doing similar?

Progress pic...Snapchat-1139584873.thumb.jpg.a226fa3f2b7d36ee8c75b5e3d340a30f.jpg

  • Like 4

G30 660 and 770 at jamboree last weekend. Asked about t3 or t4 housings possibly in the future but only doing vband housings for now. They are a direct bolt on replacement for g25 series too. 

IMG_20190824_131819.jpg

Edited by robbo_rb180
More info
  • Like 2

I was just looking at the dimensional drawings at the ATP site , it appears that Garrett have used three slightly different compressor housings .

The G25-550/660 and G30-660 use a 0.70 AR housing , the G30-770/900 and G35-900 a 0.72 housing , and the G35-1050 a 0.75 housing . From memory their diameter's are around 170 190 and 205mm .

A

  • Like 1
12 hours ago, robbo_rb180 said:

G30 660 and 770 at jamboree last weekend. Asked about t3 or t4 housings possibly in the future but only doing vband housings for now. They are a direct bolt on replacement for g25 series too. 

IMG_20190824_131819.jpg

So, are they going to be doing the T4? Or did they not answer the question? I sure hope so. 

43 minutes ago, Skylineusa said:

So, are they going to be doing the T4? Or did they not answer the question? I sure hope so. 

They said no at the moment. Maybe in the future. Would have liked to try one in t3. 92 on a Rb25 

I have a G30-900 0.83 on order with an 8-10wk wait,currently 2wks in, the anticipationis killing me, but just to top it off I had purchased a GTX3584RS the day before they were released ??? so I returned it for the G30-900 instead. I don't mind dropping up to 100HP for farrr better spool. I anticipate 700awhp out of my 2.4L built MPS. The big cams and the oversized pistons should get it spooling early, tbh my biggest worry is that it might choke it up top

Edited by Yaji
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...

hey fellas, just had a read thru. thought id chip in.

 

ive been running the .92 g25-660 for about a year now. semi closed forged ej25. amazing turbo, spool, mid range everything. almost as responsive as the tiny factory td04.

 

in my humble opinion, this is too small for an rb. you'll get mad response, but no top end.

 

runs about 340awkw at 26 psi. under very strict controls, pulled timing, torque limit etc.

clutch and semi closed engine holding us back. still makes 100kw at 95kph, and 200 kw at 110kph.

 

have since exploded that clutch, now have a new twin plate on there and a more efficient cooler. if i get it back on the dyno any time soon, ill drop back round to post the sheet.

 

we also, have a sleeved ej28 stroker in the build hopefully to have a g30-770 or g30-900 attached to it. with the current wait times, and gcg having the monopoly (and also charging full price upfront to non traders) it could be a while. once MTQ has stock, we will be all over it.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
On 10/14/2019 at 8:39 PM, Plattsy said:

ive been running the .92 g25-660 for about a year now. semi closed forged ej25. amazing turbo, spool, mid range everything. almost as responsive as the tiny factory td04.

that is great feedback!  I absolutely love the G25 with 0.72.  The 0.92 flows a ton (very impressive actually) but did have some response loss.  I would love to see any boost logs you can share. 

and if you wanted to try G30-770 we have them in stock at full race

here are the dyno results. incredible spool, amazing torque and a very long power band (for a subaru)

 

28psi by 3800 rpm. thats plenty of response! unfortunately the stock heads are killing me with its tiny cams and weak springs. would like to see this with 272s springs, and a 4 inch exhaust.

 

i raced it at the weekend in the local sprints. such an amazing car to drive. cannot talk highly enough about this turbo!

 

edit the previous run of 340kw was done at a higher ramp rate. it was dropped to 10 for this.

 

on the shoot out mode that some "tuners" like to print out, should made 370kw at all four. gotta love dynos :)

dyno.jpeg.1083cf29d95ef5d37b71fbd98215382d.jpeg

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good news!!! Changed the O ring today and Iโ€™ve got the โ€œpssshhhhโ€ back when I open the fuel cap ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿผ It was 100% the O ring because that bloody thing was inside the fuel tank ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ Fitting new fuel pump was a pain as always since the DW is a bit longer than stock. But sheโ€™s running!!! โค๏ธ
    • PWM quite literally just chops the ful 12V voltage on and off at whatever duty cycle you're running it at. If you're running it 100%, then it is on full voltage all the time, same as if there was no PWM. If you run it at 50% duty cycle, it is only seeing the full 12V half of the time. This is broadly equivalent to running it at 6V. But the crucial difference is that motors (and a lot of other loads) don't like being powered at low volts. They will either fail to start rotating, or draw a shit ton of current, or other undesirable things. But if you give them the full volt, and then a short period of no volts, and then some more full volts, then the times when they are seeing power they are seeing all the voltage, and they are happy. But you get the performance out of them as if they were only seeing that fraction of the full voltage. It is not really easy to answer your question about what flow you will get out of it at 50% duty cycle. I can tell you that it is not as simple as you think. For a start, that 460 L/h pump is not going to flow 460 when you're on boost. When you're on boost you will be somewhere down the sloping part of that red line. If you have 15 psi of boost, then the pump can only deliver about 95 gal/h, which is <380L/h. So your simple 50% on 460 = 230 wasn't going to work anyway. But also, it won't deliver 50% of 380 either, because when you devolt or PWM trim th epower being fed to the pump, it is not able to deliver flow or pressure in the same way. 50% duty cycle will probably produce <50% of the full voltage flow. The way to find out what duty cycle you need to run it at at low load (ie, at idle) is to idle it and turn the DC down until you start to lose fuel pressure, then turn it back up above that with some extra for safety. And then you do the same thing at full load, in case it doesn't need anywhere near 100% DC. And if you're careful/caution/prudent, you will also do it at a couple of loads in between so you can shape the DC map against load. It might not be linear between the two end points.
    • Man that dinner was such a long time ago....2010! I would only replace the rubber coolant lines with silicone these days; cheap, readily available and will last for ever. You will need new hose clamps though eg https://justjap.com/products/cooling-pro-silicone-engine-heater-hose-set-black-nissan-r32-gtr-rb26dett
    • I wouldn't look too hard at what they did with the R32 GTR in endurance racing in Australia... Lots of things weren't actually available from the factory in the way those cars ran them... Japan also followed what Fred Gibson was doing here with some of there endurance cars in Japan... Australia is also the reason for things like the Brembo brakes, and the change in the gearbox... And quite a few other tricks they used to pull. There's a few other SAU peeps still on these forums that will have heard the stories direct from Alan Heaphy, Fred Gibson, and Jim Richards when we were lucky enough to have a great dinner with them
    • For all the talk of "these parts are junk" I generally recommend OEM because it's really not as bad as claimed. I have never seen or heard of a case like the N63 where the oil returns completely clog with coked oil for example in ~10 years or less. Would it be nice if it were a straighter path? I guess, but most modern cars use a scavenge pump instead of a pure gravity return. Also the factory lines that would be relatively simple to convert to braided are generally speaking hardlines from the factory. I would consider braided line to be a regression, not an improvement. It's also been engineered such that all the hardlines have appropriate strain relief where needed. There's absolutely room for improvement, for example the HKS advantage heritage intake piping shows just how much can be done to make the turbos fight each other less in OEM twin turbo configuration and reduce compressor surge but it's rarely a simple/straightforward process. I recommend looking at what the group A/N1 cars did, generally speaking the changes they made were necessary and proven in endurance racing.
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...