Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Purely simplicity. Have twin scroll twin gate on my other car and it's just so much extra shit.
For the gain in response you get i would now happily trade it for something cheaper, easier to put together and easier to work on. Also going in front of DCT 7 speed so easy to keep it in the powerband pretty easily which helps, only have to get it up on boost once and should stay on the boil.

On 06/08/2022 at 8:38 PM, iruvyouskyrine said:

Purely simplicity. Have twin scroll twin gate on my other car and it's just so much extra shit.
For the gain in response you get i would now happily trade it for something cheaper, easier to put together and easier to work on. 

Absolutely this. If knew what a bastard T4 flanges were on the Precisions to work on I 100% would've opted for v band exhaust housings.

On 06/08/2022 at 9:38 PM, r32-25t said:

So that then basically admitting their Mitsubishi based turbos are junk and they had to go back to using Garrett’s 

Yep 😆

On 06/08/2022 at 9:08 PM, iruvyouskyrine said:

Have twin scroll twin gate on my other car and it's just so much extra shit.

You could have gone a Sinco manifold, each scroll is split all the way to the gate flange. Single gate, twin scroll.

Even 6 Boost has started to do the same 🥲

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
On 07/08/2022 at 9:28 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

You could have gone a Sinco manifold, each scroll is split all the way to the gate flange. Single gate, twin scroll.

Even 6 Boost has started to do the same 🥲

Or he could keep the v band inlet exhaust housing and have a turbo he can remove in 30 minutes.

On 8/8/2022 at 8:15 AM, BK said:

Or he could keep the v band inlet exhaust housing and have a turbo he can remove in 30 minutes.

How often do you take a snail off?

4 nuts and a v band vs 2 v bands. Meh.

  • Like 1
On 08/08/2022 at 8:09 AM, Piggaz said:

How often do you take a snail off?

4 nuts and a v band vs 2 v bands. Meh.

Well, when you actually use the car frequently you do need the ability to remove the turbo easily. V-band means no gaskets for potential failure or stuffing around with flange studs or replacing nuts every disassembly.

I'm not sure what the G40 series T4 flange is like on the exhaust housing, but if they are as compact on the flange plate to exhaust housing dimensions are on the Precision 6262 / 6266 / 6466 which have group C size T4 divided exhaust housings, you need to take the compressor housing off to access your turbo drain bolts and remove oil drain to then access the front outside flange stud nut.

Then your front pipe needs to be completely removed, in my case unbolting from gate outlet too, to access the rear outside flange stud nut. No curved spanners or special sockets will help you when the assembly is in the car - it needs to be done to access the frigging outside flange nuts because of how the exhaust housings are cast. Inside flange nuts no worries, both can be accessed with a socket directly.

So it's not really meh "4 nuts with a socket" job at all in a lot of cases. A v-band in / out guarantees you can just undo 2 clamps and job done, so I can see the merit as my old HKS T51 was a dream to remove.

Yeah - without direct personal experience on my car, I concur wholeheartedly with the (pro) V-band argument.

In an ideal world there would be (probably application specific) v-band manifolds and rear housings that would have dividers that aligned with each other so you could have the best of both worlds. I suspect we'll be waiting until sintered powder 3D printed housings become a cost-effective close-to-DIY sort of thing before we can hope for it to happen though.

On 8/6/2022 at 5:08 AM, r32-25t said:

So thats them basically admitting their Mitsubishi based turbos are junk and they had to go back to using Garrett’s 

As far as I can tell these are replacing their GTII turbos which I'm having trouble figuring out the actual origin of. They're still selling the GTIII turbos. They are admitting that if you want the kind of power that twin GT-RS/GTIII-RS turbos provide you should be going for a Garrett single turbo instead. Weirdly enough in their chart for a full drag build RB28 the power difference between their twin GTII turbo and the single GT turbo is not much to write home about, you'd imagine they would try and figure out something more noteworthy to show for marketing purposes:

1907928829_ScreenShot2022-08-07at6_42_24PM.thumb.png.8d5a9dce2be7b5ec83fce92bcd565be1.png

They also plan on releasing T25 and T4 flange variants and there's clearly a twin scroll manifold pictured when they mention "GT turbine setup kit for RB26".

As BK said there is much more to it that just the flange. If you have seen any of my other cars the exhaust manifolds are extremely excessive (which i absolutely love) and once again i will be doing something similar on this car. Good luck getting a twin scroll twin gate low mount G40 into an engine bay and working on it at all.

Twin scroll v band with merged single gate would be the tits but anyway......

  • Like 1

I must be doing v-band wrong as I find my new vband setup much harder to remove/install over my old 4 bolts (x2). Horizontal access is really limited for the turbo vs coming from the top for the T4 flange on my old setup.  I do really like no gaskets and being able to position the turbo though.  I went a bit silly and used VBands through exhaust system, some of which I want to switch back to flanged now for fix position and lets say more flexible "tolerances"

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...

Hey all, after some advice in regards to what turbo I should be aiming for to replace my aging -5s. If possible, I'm aiming for 500+rwkw without going 35psi, while hopefully still, being more responsive than my -5s. I haven't got a big flowing head and cams so I imagine I will be pushing the single turbo quite hard, however if possible I'd like to remain around the 25psi mark to meet my goals. Tell me I'm dreaming if I am..

 

My current setup is as follows:

 

Racepace RB28 bottom end

RB25 NEO Non-Turbo head with VCT

RB25 Neo Turbo STOCK Intake camshaft / HKS 260 degree Exhaust camshaft (mismatch I know)

No porting other than removing the humps in the exhaust ports, however the intake and exhaust ports are far smaller than turbo heads

-5 Turbos with dumps 

3" HKS Exhaust with front pipes and decat

E85 

Haltech Elite 2500

Approximately 435rwkw @ 23psi

I believe it comes on boost at around 4500rpm, unfortunately I don't have a dyno graph with RPM overlay and PSI.

 

As you can see, the head and camshafts are going to be the limiting factor and I'm not looking to change them at this stage. 

 

I've been told that a GTX3582RS GEN 2 would be the go-er, which seems like is it roughly equal to a G35-900 anyway.. and even then, due to the small head, would I be better off with a .83 dual V-Band rear housing? Or go larger and get the 1.01 dual v-band rear housing? Pulsar now also sell a .85 twin scroll T4 as well. 

 

To sum it all up, I THINK A G30-900 or G35-900 is probably the right turbo for my goals. I was thinking of using the SINCO T4 Twin Scroll mentioned by @Dose Pipe Sutututu as that's barely any more money than a 6booby and seems much better anyway. I assume a G30 isn't going to cut the mustard for 500+kw though?

For those who haven't seen, Racepace recently ran up a G35-900 with SIMILAR setup to mine and made 565rwkw on 26psi, I just don't know how laggy it is, although Racepace aren't known for building laggy cars usually. Might need to pop in and see what they say about it. (Pic attached is Racepace build not my car)

https://fb.watch/geIcPyDzBs/

 

Keen to hear everyone's opinions on it as it's quite a rare combo of top and bottom end.

FB_IMG_1666119609382.jpg

Hmm. Yes, well, the GTX3582 would have been the recco prior to G series, and now I would have thought that either of the G30 or 35 900s would have done the job for what you're after.  So I agree with your choice space. I tend to think that the G35 is probably worth a go, with the smallest rear housing that will reach the goal. I should probably let others speak to that.

If response is important, then you will likely prefer the twin scroll option over the V band options, although I** worry that the TS 0.85 rear will limit the 500kW target.

**Perhaps needlessly, again, wait for others to weigh in.

I’d use the g35 because the rb engines love the bigger rear wheels. Personally I’d use a 1.0x twin scroll rear housing, the different in response by using the twin scroll rear really makes them the only choice 

56 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Hmm. Yes, well, the GTX3582 would have been the recco prior to G series, and now I would have thought that either of the G30 or 35 900s would have done the job for what you're after.  So I agree with your choice space. I tend to think that the G35 is probably worth a go, with the smallest rear housing that will reach the goal. I should probably let others speak to that.

If response is important, then you will likely prefer the twin scroll option over the V band options, although I** worry that the TS 0.85 rear will limit the 500kW target.

**Perhaps needlessly, again, wait for others to weigh in.

My fear is that a I'll spend all this money converting to single turbo, and a G30-900 won't even be able to crack 500kw.

 

Both the G30 and G35 come in a .85 Twin Scroll rear housing if I bought a Pulsar version which is good, however if I was to go any bigger AR then I would be sacrificing twin scroll to go to V-Band. 

15 minutes ago, r32-25t said:

I’d use the g35 because the rb engines love the bigger rear wheels. Personally I’d use a 1.0x twin scroll rear housing, the different in response by using the twin scroll rear really makes them the only choice 

I think you and GTSBoy are on the same page and I have been leaning towards the G35 all along (only with one friend of mine screaming in my ear to go G30). I'll need to go back through this thread to find some more results but I seem to remember G35-900s making very good power (500+kW) out of smaller rear housings, something which the older turbos weren't as capable of.. I also see that @Full-Race Geoff is fond of the .6x rear housings and smaller rear housings throughout the entire G series range.

 

I think G35 is going to be the goer but I'll wait a little bit and see if anyone chimes in why that would be a disastrous idea, cheers for your vital input you two!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thing I'd be doing, is pulling it out, and just getting the tune cleaned up for now. Before that even happens, checking over everything, like vac hoses, fuel hoses, etc. No point dropping thousands on sensors if the moment you start it back up all the oil leaks out, or it has massive vacuum leaks etc.   But really, to know what to do, depends on what your use case is. Hard core track car? Throw most sensors available at it. Street car, I'd probably just run oil pressure, oil temps, water pressure, water temp, probably fuel pressure too. I don't know exactly what the Link can handle and do with those though. And if it's mainly just to cruise the streets, rather than mountain runs, you can probably skip most of the above if you've already got them in as gauges and warning lights.   PS, inb4 "sell it and buy a modern sportscar"
    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
×
×
  • Create New...