Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Our Mazda CX7 needs new front disks soon. We're driving to Jindy in January so I'd like to have new ones by then.

Because I absolutely just can't replace part for part and NEED to upgrade I started looking at whether I could improve the brakes at all with some OEM items from another Mazda. And I can! 

The CX9 and CX7 Diesel both have 320mm disks compared to my CX7's 296mm. The only difference for the bigger disks are that the caliper brackets are larger. This means that with the larger brackets, I can run 320's. 

The problem is that the brackets are $270ea from a dealer and the 3 or 4 wreckers I've asked don't have them. 

So while I really want to do this upgrade I'm wondering whether its actually worth it. Will 24mm greater diameter with the same calipers actually make much difference?

Thanks guys,

Christian

Well 32 33 gtrs are 280mm and vspec brembos are 320mm arent they?

Personally i havent done the upgrade so i cant say first hand but to me i dont think its much of an upgrade.

Considering the car its going on i doubt you would even notice the difference city/traffic driving.

Decent disc/pad change with new fluid. Cheap. Cheerful.

It would make sfa difference on the street on a runabout car such as your cx7. If you where racing it or doing hill runs, the bigger disc would help dissipate heat better and retain ultimate braking for longer. If the brackets where cheap, i would say do it but at 270 each, not worth it unless you get some from a pick a part type wrecker for cheap cheap.

 

As said above, decent pads and fluid will make the biggest difference and is where I would spend my money.

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Get better pads and you'll be sweet :)

Also shameless plug, can get you decent deals on DBA stuff

lol offering trader services to THE Admin without paying for SAU trader status :4_joy: bold move.

2 hours ago, GTofuS-T said:

lol offering trader services to THE Admin without paying for SAU trader status :4_joy: bold move.

hahaha admin wins, gets mad prices lol and if my car is ready he can take it for a skid too ololol

Interesting scenario, can we perhaps negate car model and discuss the extremes to highlight attributes associated with big vs small rotors? 

Theoretically, as mentioned above disc size would increase the potential limit of heat absorbtion and dissipation through increased thermal mass. Would material also affect the rate and limit of which the disc could convert force into heat? 

If discs were thicker they would also be able to accommodate larger vanes increasing cooling surface area.

I think also being more further away from the axis the braking moment (as in force over distance) would be increased, increasing stopping power but also may promote locking up? 

I forget, is unsprung weight a good thing or bad thing for handling? Larger brake disks would weigh more, statically lowering the centre of gravity but because not a rigid connection to the chassis may also be a disadvantage in a dynamic situation?  Would rotational mass of rotor be negligible due to being so close to the axis? 

Heavy front rotors would take the trajectional force better under extreme application than lighter rotors, right? This would provide more stability on hard braking when the nose dives onto the front axis?

I don't know, just curious. Any experts in this field? 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I just got to work and skimmed through 61508 and 61511. I was surprised the CSA adopted both, but neither are enforced. To recap what I read, it states that in a perfect world, they should be segregated but they acknowledge that this is not industry standard and clearly mention that they allow mixing of safety and non-safety. 61511 also mentions software segregation like AB does in their safety PLC's.   Now if only I could go back to control, let alone safety over comms. In my current line of work, we're only allowed monitoring and basic control over comms. Everything critical must still be hard wired as much as possible. 
    • I've unfortunately never been as they're on the complete other side of the continent and another country that isn't currently letting us in as easily as they use to. I even heard their stop signs over there actually say "Stop" instead of "Arret". If I decided to trek the 48h drive, I wouldn't know when or where to stop haha. Whenever I order parts from UP Garage, I order from Japan as it's cheaper. Same with GKTech... oddly enough, it's cheaper shipped from Australia then it is the US.  UP Garage Japan operates their US leg though, unlike Tomei. If Tomei JPN had the power to close down Tomei USA, I'm sure it would be done in a day. They're two completely separate entities. Tomei JPN messed up somewhere originally agreeing to its creation and got sacked big time. 
    • I asked someone about this and he told me about the Audi 1.8T engine. But I think it would be difficult to swap
    • I don't know that machine specifically, but I'd personally go for something with a little more kick than 130amp. Around up to 180 would be good. At the 6mm range, you're really pushing the machine hard and don't have a long period you can run for with out needing to give it a rest. Lots of MIG machines come with a regulator and hose. A lot will come with a starter roll of wire too, but it isn't too expensive to buy. I'd recommend NOT buying a massive roll too, as you don't want it sitting around FOREVER in the machine between uses and potentially going to shit. For thin sheet metal, get a roll of 0.6mm if you're doing over 3mm and above, switch over to 0.8mm wire. Even by 2mm you'd probably really want to switch. As for gas battle, it's all swap and go style now. You'll pay a bottle deposit, and then X amount to swap for a full one. I think it's like $200 or $300 for a D Size bottle upfront as "deposit", and like $110 to $150 per swap. My D size CO2/argon bottle lasts a fair bit of welding on the MIG. And I run an E size bottle on the TIG. For DIY MIG, stick with a D size bottle. If you really start to get into a LOT of welding and doing it really regularly, then upgrade. If you're like most DIY car guys, one D bottle will last you 2 or 3 years easily. I think I've been on my current bottle about 5 years. It is starting to get low, but I've been smashing it a lot more the last 6 months.
    • SR20s came with cars like the Bluebird and Primera, but the RB20 never came. The ones in Turkey were either brought in specially or from abroad. That's why RBs aren't as common as SRs. And if a part breaks or I need to replace it when doing maintenance, it's harder to find parts for RBs.
×
×
  • Create New...