Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Paul V said:

Seriously man, it’s people like you that give JDM drivers a bad name. Time to think about your appreciating asset. What’s the value in doing donuts? Who are you trying to impress? Have you thought about the consequences? 

what consequences are there doing a donut at my farm?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473022-r34-diff-issues/#findComment-7863994
Share on other sites

His car, he can do whatever he wants.

Back to the topic at hand as mentioned it's more or less working as designed. If you're really wanting to lock it up, consider a mechanical LSD.

You can also weld it, but I and many others wouldn't recommend it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473022-r34-diff-issues/#findComment-7863999
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Paul V said:

Seriously man, it’s people like you that give JDM drivers a bad name. Time to think about your appreciating asset. What’s the value in doing donuts? Who are you trying to impress? Have you thought about the consequences? 

Appreciating asset? You obviuosly have no idea how Xteen's treat their NA R34's :4_joy:

Just weld it, simple easy and effective. Nowhere near as good as a mechanical LSD but if you want to do skids then it works a treat.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473022-r34-diff-issues/#findComment-7864001
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paul V said:

Seriously man, it’s people like you that give JDM drivers a bad name. Time to think about your appreciating asset. What’s the value in doing donuts? Who are you trying to impress? Have you thought about the consequences? 

You are right.a donut that starts off good then turns into a single spinner gives jdm drivers a bad name.

For that reason alone a welded diff is superior.

 

Also, on the topic I have impressed myself many times with a decent donut. No need for spectators, my own admiration is enough.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473022-r34-diff-issues/#findComment-7864005
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Paul V said:

Seriously man, it’s people like you that give JDM drivers a bad name. Time to think about your appreciating asset. What’s the value in doing donuts? Who are you trying to impress? Have you thought about the consequences? 

it is quite an assumption, without any further enquiry as to where said donuts are being allegedly performed and in what fashion. Doing donuts is about as much fun as eating them; ie lots.

Doing donuts in middle of busy city intersection = bad (although have seen it done...dickheads)

Doing donuts in appropriate place = sensual.

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473022-r34-diff-issues/#findComment-7864031
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

Also, on the topic I have impressed myself many times with a decent donut. No need for spectators, my own admiration is enough.

damn straight Big B. It reminds me of the time I did backside deckers and pivot-fakies on the vert ramp at Merimbula. No one believed me, in fact they called me a liar. A liar they said, but I knew the real truth, and the truth did set me free.

 

 

 

although I also ate shit many times in attempting said backside deckers.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/473022-r34-diff-issues/#findComment-7864032
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duh... to answer my own silly question, it's actually described in the FSM... ...400 pages away at the end of the manual, for RB25DE/DET signal descriptions, it cites the TPSwitch signal action, is dependent on the TPSensor value ~ this tends to infer the builtin POT voltage signal is the primary, and the switches are fallback/secondary should the POT fail/TPSensor signal lost (and switch alone with no TPSensor signal allows for base idle speed setting).... makes sense... they (TPS units) used to fail/wear the POT with time, they're not exactly built to last ~ having the switch as a redundancy gets around this...(or, it's less likely both signals would be lost as they're on different power rails)... and of course wrt RB26DETT, you have to electrically disconnect the IACV solenoid from the harness, to defeat idle air control...  
    • Dose is unaware just how much fun 145-150kw would be in a 2.5L NC MX5. It would be one of the most fun things to drive to ever grace SAU.
    • Same thought crossed my mind ~ depends on how one connotes 'stalling'...ie; gets a rough/stumbling idle as it get warm until it stalls... or... idles ok and simply falls-over when it gets to temp... ...you can test the whole circuit with a couple of resistors ...unplug coolant temp sensor, bridge terminals with a 2K7 resistor (ECU will do cold start), or with engine warm bridge with a 330R resistor (ECU will consider engine to be at normal operating temp)...it's a quick way to check wiring integrity/ECU response when you don't have a multimeter handy ...
    • They also make them with the motor mounted on the side 
    • Just be warned that that turbo will not be a direct re-fit to the car. The exhaust housing is, of course, in the same place. It has to be - it's bolted to the exhaust manifold. So the dump will fit up. But the centre housing is not as long, so the comp housing will move backwards. This will affect both the turbo inlet and the outlet. There is fab work that needs to be done. Yes. it has one, it should have one. Paper gasket.
×
×
  • Create New...