Jump to content
SAU Community

RB20det Tune Issues


nj1
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Apologies for the long post.

 

Ever since having cams installed on my rb20det r32 skyline I have had consistent idle issues.

 

Car was initially built and tuned by Tuner 2 but I went to Tuner 1 as I changed address.

 

TUNER 1:

 

Did all the head work includings cams, camshafts, springs and tuned the car with new setup.

 

Initially the car's idle would hunt on cold start. The idle would bounce from basically stalling to 1300 rpm and stall. It would take 4 to 5 attempts to start the car.

 

After advice from this forum I took it to my usual Tuner (Tuner 2) to check the tune.

 

TUNER 2:

 

Reviewed the tune (done by Tuner 1) and said it was rubbish (car was essentially block tuned) and dyno tuned the car and fixed cold start and found more mid range power.

 

On cold start the car still hunts between 700 to 1200 rpm for about 15 seconds then settles down to approx 900 rpm. I can live with this as atleast the car starts now.

 

This all well and good except now when I drive and come to a complete stop with the clutch in the car idle hunts again and 90% of the time stalls.

 

So far 2 seperate tuners are having trouble getting the car to idle.

 

I am not sure what is causing the problem specifically. Any advice on what I should be telling the tuner or questions I should be asking to get the problem fixed?

 

For my info what causes the idle to hunt? Is the ecu controlling/cutting fuel on/off?

 

Any advice would be much appreciated.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clean the idle valve at first. It's located at the rear of the intake manifold. Once cleaned you may need to set the idle again but it should solve your problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What ECU, do you have a wideband etc? Do you have the ability to access and change the timing and fuel maps yourself?

A couple of things spring to mind with a tune: 1) inconsistent and overly retarded timing in the idle load cells. 2) inconsistent and/or oscillating afrs in the idle load cells. Lean spots and retarded timing will prevent the engine from settling into a steady idle. The auxiliary air controller can start oscillating to prevent a stall, which then interacts with the above issues. Without measurements, its only a guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Are both the AAC and IAC still in use?

My 20 hunted on cold start until I refitted the cold start valve.

I thought it was the aftermarket plenum, but once I had all the factory sensors back and wired it was like factory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...