Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

just after any info anyone has on the difference between the headlights on the pre-Aug 2000 R34 GTR (v spec) headlights and the post August v-spec II headlights. They have different part numbers and i was wondering if anyone knew what the difference between them was, and how easy it would be to fit the earlier model R34 GTR headlights to the later R34 GTRs. I bought a pair of the earlier ones years ago then sold them because they weren't a straight swap for the vpsec II ones. Anyone have some definitive answers and know if or how easy it would be to fit the vspec lights to a vspec II? I recall the positioning of the tabs being different though i may be wrong....

8 hours ago, Iron Mike said:

I bought a pair of the earlier ones years ago then sold them because they weren't a straight swap for the vpsec II ones

How were they different? Different part number could be different a different bulb, or connector, or any other component, but the housing itself could be identical.

I don't quite remember hence me asking :4_joy:......but they wouldn't fit and i think the tabs may have been in slightly different positions. Also the v-spec II headlights are now discontinued but Nissan Japan still makes the earlier model lights...

I am 99% sure the tabs would be the same between 1601 & 1618's. The rad support is the same for all isnt it?

 

Differences are auto leveling (late model 1618 doesnt have the female connector between the caps, the colour of the insert (early model is light bronze vs silver) & the ballast (late model has smaller ballast). And ofcourse the lens on the front has 1601 or 1618.

 

And yes late model 1618's are discontinued. I bought one of the last sets from Nissan in Japan late last year.

 

 

Looks like the only difference is the levelling motors + harness?
http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/161966-headlights-uk-r34-gtr.html#post2734537

The ballast should be the same though, any chance of a picture of the smaller ballast?

This is what a 1601 (early model) looks like.. 

Notice the connector. 

image.png.7171193f20c76c26e7f876eacfbfc209.png

This is what its ballast looks like.. 

image.png.d2e2637343d4b83056e935e439e9c974.png

And another pic.. 

image.png.f003c4f0c93899a0fb6e024d028bd00c.png

Comparing to what a 1618 headlight looks like. This pic is of the brand new unit I received. Notice the connector is blanked off..

image.thumb.png.5dad68b87812e14d37993ba4b7ab94b1.png

And what a 1618 ballast looks like.. (I didnt take any pics of the ballast on mine. Was too scared resting it on the lens!)

image.png.803e24fd04464e5e374a401434fe42a5.png

image.png.59e2e8874d61a6e04a92c13b1798086a.png

The codes are on the lower corner on each lens which is the easiest way to identify them. 

image.png.05c53c1a62b310da363bcdd1a155f37f.png

image.png.8b895661c064bcbc0196708247cccb21.png

Also while on this topic, ER34 (GTT) headlights are totally different to these two. 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Yesss big shame they recently discontinued them. I was eyeing off a pair early 2017 then went overseas and forgot about them. Had another look few weeks ago and was gutted to see they're no longer around though theres a few sets of the early model headlights still going round :29_smirk:...do you know what it would take to fit these Raj? I actually quite like the ballast colour of the Vspec I more than the Vspec II. 

 

Cheers for your post. Very informative

Edited by Iron Mike

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyZDvZmvhik
    • You'd be better off digging a pit and standing under it to shoot it.
    • The easiest way would to be ignore the oscilloscope, grab a multimeter, and make sure all the main connections are right. An oscilloscope will give 99.9% of even technicians so much grief, as they have no idea what things should even look like on an oscilloscope. Which is also even more likely for someone who's first ever major work on a car is this If the battery volts are dropping down so low, the LDV will reboot the ECU, when it does so, it will drop out the start circuit. If this is occuring, the battery voltage should also come back up. Give it a few tests, even simple ones like when you're attempting to crank it, measure voltage from the engine block, to the negative terminal. You might find you've got really bad connections somewhere. My guess is the "new" motor has something like a shit starter motor, at which point, you can swap the starter motor from the old motor, to the new motor. Before I did any of the above though, I'd 100% confirm the battery in the vehicle. Most jumper packs are absolutely useless, especially if a battery has a bad cell for example. Also the new modern "jump packs" if you don't know what you're doing with them, you won't even get them into high current stage. So go back to basics, check the battery, especially with a known good one as a replacement test. Check ALL the wiring, this includes where they're bolted onto the battery, and bolted onto the starter motor. Check all the earth straps are on. Measure your resistances across your earth straps. A good check here is to measure voltage across the earth straps while you're trying to crank it. If you're seeing voltage, you've got high resistance joints! Oh, and once you've done the above, check the battery over again.
    • For most rotisseries, as Duncan has mentioned, you really don't want a full car on it, you want a stripped shell. And imagine how many more weeks THAT is going to add to working on the car...
×
×
  • Create New...