Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Apologies in advance for the age old topic and question, but I'm having a very hard time finding any of the old threads and results on SAU about this and other skyline forums aren't much help either. Even google search results aren't yielding any solid information.

 

What I want to know is, how do the rb25 s1/2 HKS 256 8.8 / 264 9.0 "drop in" cams compare to Tomei 256 8.5 / 256 8.5 pon cams as far as boost response is concerned ??

I currently use the poncams and I'm wondering if I install a set of the hks or even just a hks exhaust cam, can I gain a little more mid range and peak without loosing any response...

 

The only sort of info I have been finding is people speculating about a set up they "know of" or "a mates car used these and made heaps of power"...

Obviously a before and after dyno comparison on a same car, same dyno & same day with the two different brand of cams would be ideal but I highly doubt that info is out there..

 

My set up is s1 rb25 with HKS 2835 pro S .87a/r internally gated on e85 making 470whp on 24psi

 

Any links of help is greatly appreciated lads [emoji1365]

 

IMG_8360.jpg

I was going to say....why bugger about with the brand name Jap cams when Kelford and even Camtech have excellent choices and local support?

 

 

I'm open to any and all brands if I can retain VCT and keep my current responsiveness !!!!!

Please feel free to school me (:

1 hour ago, Lithium said:

What new cam?  Got any more info than that?

I'll be running them in my new motor. Still about a month away from being available. They're a 264/272 10mm VCT combo! They should be an awesome cam if you're chasing decent numbers. First cam that I know of that is more than 9mm lift while still retaining VCT. 

Downside is it's obviously not going to be a drop in cam with 10mm lift, so head clearancing will be required. 

  • Like 1
I'll be running them in my new motor. Still about a month away from being available. They're a 264/272 10mm VCT combo! They should be an awesome cam if you're chasing decent numbers. First cam that I know of that is more than 9mm lift while still retaining VCT. 
Downside is it's obviously not going to be a drop in cam with 10mm lift, so head clearancing will be required. 



Very interested to see what you get out of those [emoji848]

These results from the RB25 dyno thread are pretty decent as far as response is concerned and that's a pretty decent top end figure too for that boost level on only 23psi & p98 fuel [emoji848]
looks very poncam-like.

I guess hub dyno results are a little stretched tho..

IMG_1443.jpgIMG_1444.jpg

Another set of old results from the RB25 dyno thread that look quite promising for poncam-like response with a decent top end for the given turbo/boost and fuel.

Starting to think I I may be able to realise my girl [emoji848]

IMG_1445.jpgIMG_1446.jpg

Another set of old results from the RB25 dyno thread that look quite promising for poncam-like response with a decent top end for the given turbo/boost and fuel.

Starting to think I I may be able to realise my girl [emoji848]

IMG_1445.thumb.jpg.12b61e2003092f6b5905f1f831d49c54.jpgIMG_1446.thumb.jpg.79e2acaf0da6b4afeb7be4786d249df6.jpg



Better pic of the dyno without the power figures cut off...

IMG_1454.jpg

This is my graph, ran 11.6 @126mph with manual, 11.2 @124mph with powerglide (did run a 126mph).

RB25DET, Tomei HG, ARP Headstuds, Gt3076r-wg, Tomei 256 drop ins, Custom 3" dump, decat, 3" cat back with muffler, 45mm Hypergate, CRG Manifold.

20170905_221032.jpg

This is my graph, ran 11.6 @126mph with manual, 11.2 @124mph with powerglide (did run a 126mph).
RB25DET, Tomei HG, ARP Headstuds, Gt3076r-wg, Tomei 256 drop ins, Custom 3" dump, decat, 3" cat back with muffler, 45mm Hypergate, CRG Manifold.
20170905_221032.thumb.jpg.dffafbd3d4176ac542d9b1e4ff631595.jpg


Thanks for the post man. I'm only really after HKS 256/264 cam results though...
I have poncams now and theres literally hundreds of poncam results around the net.

Is your turbo internal gate?

I think this obsession over the specific brand of cam is a bit odd.  Regardless of whether there was some interesting differences in the profiles between the HKS cams and the Poncams at the same ~256° duration, the fact remains that they are both 256° and there are a million other things that influence what the dyno curves and 400 times will come out looking like.  Things like how they've been dialled in, exhaust manifold, turbo choice, and a bunch of others are going to be far far more significant than the lobes on the cams.

  • Like 1
I think this obsession over the specific brand of cam is a bit odd.  Regardless of whether there was some interesting differences in the profiles between the HKS cams and the Poncams at the same ~256° duration, the fact remains that they are both 256° and there are a million other things that influence what the dyno curves and 400 times will come out looking like.  Things like how they've been dialled in, exhaust manifold, turbo choice, and a bunch of others are going to be far far more significant than the lobes on the cams.


My question has nothing to do with the brand...
When I state the brand, I'm referring to the specs of that particular brand not the brand itself my dude.
Yes Tomei make 256 and so does HKS, but once again... I'm referring to the staggered 256/264 hks cams vs Tomei 256/256 so there is a difference and will be a certain characteristic relating each of the cam types in rb25 set ups that have same/same turbos and bolt ons as seen in the graphs I've posted above. One thing that's interesting is that hks cams do seem to bring boost on earlier compared to the poncams and make slightly more peak for same boost levels but bottem to mid power seems to be much the same in a fair few of the results.
Another thing I've noticed is the hks staggered seem to do a better job with internal gate boost control but when externally gates the poncams are pretty equal.

Fair enough.  I'd actually glossed over the fact that the HKS cams were staggered.  My opinion on the matter of staggered cams with bigger exhausts on turbo engines leads towards discussion of fixing the problem that requires a staggered cam instead of the band-aid solution.  External gates &/or bigger rear housings &/or better ex manifolds being the non-band-aid solutions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ah right. Maybe my rb just loves chewing through batteries lol.
    • On the R34 can't you just unplug the IACV? This is the way I've always done it on the R33. Disconnect IACV, get it idling around 650rpm, and then do a power reset on the ECU to get it to relearn idle (factory ECU).   The big reason no one has touched on as to why you'd want to get the base idle right, is that it means the computer needs to make smaller adjustments to get a good idle at 700-750rpm.   Also, cleaning the IACV won't normally make the car suddenly idle lower or higher. The main issue with the IACV gumming up is that the valve sticks. This means the inputs the ECU gives, aren't translating to changes in air flow. This can cause idle choppy ness as the ECU is now needing to give a lot of input to get movement, but then it moves too far, and then has to do the same in reverse, and it can mean the ECU can't catch stalls quickly either.
    • 12.8 for a great condition, fully charged battery. If the battery will only ever properly charge to about 12.2V, the battery is well worn, and will be dead soon. When I say properly charge, I mean disconnect it from the car, charge it to its max, and then put your multimeter on it, and see what it reads about an hour later. Dieing batteries will hold a higher "surface charge", but the minutest load, even from just a multimeter (which in the scheme of things is considered totally irrelevant, especially at this level) will be enough over an hour to make the surface charge disappear.   I spend wayyy too much time analysing battery voltages for customers when they whinge that our equipment (telematics device) is causing their battery to drain all the time. Nearly every case I can call it within about 2 months of when the battery will be completely dead. Our bigger customers don't even debate it with me any more ha ha ha. A battery at 12.4 to 12.6 I'd still be happy enough with. However, there's a lot of things that can cause a parasitic draw in a car, first of which is alarms and immobilisers. To start checking, put your multimeter into amps, (and then connect it properly) and measure your power draw with everything off. Typical car battery is about 40aH. Realistically, you'll get about half this before the car won't start. So a 100mA power drain will see you pretty much near unstartable in 8 days.
    • Car should sit at 12.2 or more, maybe 12.6 or 12.7 when fully charged and happy. If there is a decent enough parasitic load then it will certainly go lower than 12.2 with time. You can't beat physics.
    • Ok guess I can rule out the battery, probably even the starter and alternator (maybe) as well. I'm gonna clean those leads and see what happens if it's still shit I might take it to an auto electrician. Unless the immobiliser is that f**king heavy, but it shouldn't be.  If I start the car every day, starts up perfectly never an issue. Isn't 12v low, shouldn't it be around 12.5v?
×
×
  • Create New...