Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Have a new R32 GTR in the stable. It's a long story but suffice it to say I have very very little information on this car and it will, in the near future be heading to a mechanic to see exactly what has already been done. 

It already has a big single turbo conversion that is super laggy, full boost at like 5100rpm.

Straight to the very weird question:

I only want to make 400hp at wheels, I want the absolute best street response up to that power level. 

Putting twins back on is cost prohibitive. 

Best single for my purpose?

 

Thankyou 

10 hours ago, WantGTR said:

Gen ii 3582r. More responsive than any twin setup and will make more power everywhere. Plus lots more than 400hp

Thankyou for the suggestion. Just had a quick look, with a power range of 450 to 800hp it seems way out of my needs, especially coming in at $3,200. 

Does anything else offer good spool up time, more of a 450 top range and come in a bit cheaper? 

I do realise that a 450 to 800 HP window is a great investment at $3200 if you think you might upgrade later but I'm 100% confident I'm happy with 400-450hp

53 minutes ago, Up_Troys_Bucket said:

Thankyou for the suggestion. Just had a quick look, with a power range of 450 to 800hp it seems way out of my needs, especially coming in at $3,200. 

Does anything else offer good spool up time, more of a 450 top range and come in a bit cheaper? 

I do realise that a 450 to 800 HP window is a great investment at $3200 if you think you might upgrade later but I'm 100% confident I'm happy with 400-450hp

How much are you expecting to spend? What is the current setup? You can take a punt and buy a china version of the turbo if you want to save money. Its a waste but its cheaper.

2 hours ago, WantGTR said:

How much are you expecting to spend? What is the current setup? You can take a punt and buy a china version of the turbo if you want to save money. Its a waste but its cheaper.

I'm not adverse to spending money, I just think if GCG are for example selling the GTX3076R for sub $2000 (admittedly for the RB25) with a 350-550hp range then there must be something in that price range to suit my needs for the rb26. 

I have also emailed gcg to see what they can come up with. 

3 hours ago, Piggaz said:

7670/1.05

e85

supporting mods

go.

Not keen on running E85 to be honest. Has to be achievable on pump gas

 

22 minutes ago, Griffin said:

Borg Warner s256 or similar. Unbeatable for value and reliability.

Don't get caught in the crowd like all the other sheep on the forum. Do what suits your needs. 

Plenty of cheque book racers on here will tell you otherwise.

Thanks mate, I will check it out now 

17 minutes ago, Up_Troys_Bucket said:

I'm not adverse to spending money, I just think if GCG are for example selling the GTX3076R for sub $2000 (admittedly for the RB25) with a 350-550hp range then there must be something in that price range to suit my needs for the rb26. 

I have also emailed gcg to see what they can come up with. 

There's no difference in the application.  For all intents and purposes, once you take the twins off a 26, the turbo to make any given power level is essentially the same thing on either engine.

7 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Next size down is GTX3076.  GTX turbos work best at high pressure ratios, so you might even be better off with a non-GTX (ie, GT).

Or, you could go to Borg Warner's matchbot and play with selecting from their offerings.  Likely cost more.

I would go GTX3576R and a nice 1.xx rear divided housing.

Twins are not responsive, nor are they great for transient response. You need a good twin scroll setup, from what you may have there - it "could" be a dinosaur single scroll setup with a turbo from the 1990s.

I'm using modified factory twin turbo manifolds with a single twin scroll housing, single 40mm waste gate.

Starts making usable boost from 2000 rpm. Power holds til 8000 rpm without dropping off.

Total cost of $300 for turbo, $4 for 2 x gaskets, $13 for marmon flange . Plus bits I had laying around and a tune.

 

5 hours ago, Griffin said:

I'm using modified factory twin turbo manifolds with a single twin scroll housing, single 40mm waste gate.

Starts making usable boost from 2000 rpm. Power holds til 8000 rpm without dropping off.

Total cost of $300 for turbo, $4 for 2 x gaskets, $13 for marmon flange . Plus bits I had laying around and a tune.

 

What turbo and how much power does it make?

1 hour ago, Griffin said:

A borgwarner s256 ish off a diesel tractor. Touch under 400wkw. Left the 305 semis on. Not sure if the number would be different with smaller tyres.

If you ran it on the dyno with smaller street tyres it will read higher :)

 

1 hour ago, Griffin said:

A borgwarner s256 ish off a diesel tractor. Touch under 400wkw.

What fuel for that result?  I'm thinking E85.

Post up dyno sheet with torque curve if you've got one!

S256 is still a very good unit, given its age.  Application is on a John Deere harvester.  There's an updated/higher flowing unit too, called S257SXE.  Both built to deliver/handle high pressure ratios, so the thrust bearing is good.  I nearly got one but BW Matchbot and a bit of consultation with Full Race indicated they were a touch small for a 30DET.

Very good match on a 25/26 capacity and a comfortable 450rwhp on petrol.  If I still ran the short stroke bottom end, I'd go for one and spend on a twin gate/split pulse setup.

The new price vs performance for these things makes them a no brainer up against "budget" and "entry level" units.
 

That's without ecb connected. Single 40mm wastegate, twins aren't needed  imo. Turbo is extended tip compressor. The one I took off is from a CAT engine. Same size wheels with a different size/ shape rear housing. That's going on a 2630 now. Aiming fora responsive 300kw on p98.

That one has been on the rb26 for about 3 years trouble free. Not a drop of oil anywhere and zero wear.

 

Edited by Griffin
Typo
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...