Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have been using Platinum Pro Plug-in for my R34 GTR for awhile now, I see many people switching to Hall Effect Sensors for the RB26. Anyone have postive experience here?

 

I’m planning out my RB28 build now and would like to know what is the involvment in switching stock sensors to these aftermarket trigger kits? I’m thinking to use this kit that places a Hall effect sensor at the exhaust cam and crank as well. Specifically this kit https://rossperformanceparts.com/product/nissan-rb-crank-cam-trigger-kit-twin-cam/

Edited by etang789
2 hours ago, etang789 said:

 I see many people switching to Hall Effect Sensors for the RB26. Anyone have postive experience here?

I’m planning out my RB28 build now and would like to know what is the involvment in switching stock sensors to these aftermarket trigger kits? 

As the OEM CAS units age, there is a definite drop off in their accuracy.  Things wear, and you get a small amount of slop in the drive splines.

And with bigger power pulses from a more powerful engine, this all combines to produce timing scatter so that the ECU doesn't exactly know correct engine speed or position.  Not good when you want a good tune and reliability.

Proper crank trigger setup is the ultimate fix IMO with an RB.  Equal importance to an oiling system that doesn't suck air or break pump gears.

Hall sensors are not the ideal choice and can get "lost" sometimes.  Which is why OEM setups use reluctors.

But the kit you mention can/does work well.  Which it would want to, for the $$ required. You will need some wiring changes, and a tuner who knows how to configure the ECU to read/interpret the triggering.

  • Like 1
On 5/21/2018 at 10:56 AM, Dale FZ1 said:

As the OEM CAS units age, there is a definite drop off in their accuracy.  Things wear, and you get a small amount of slop in the drive splines.

And with bigger power pulses from a more powerful engine, this all combines to produce timing scatter so that the ECU doesn't exactly know correct engine speed or position.  Not good when you want a good tune and reliability.

Proper crank trigger setup is the ultimate fix IMO with an RB.  Equal importance to an oiling system that doesn't suck air or break pump gears.

Hall sensors are not the ideal choice and can get "lost" sometimes.  Which is why OEM setups use reluctors.

But the kit you mention can/does work well.  Which it would want to, for the $$ required. You will need some wiring changes, and a tuner who knows how to configure the ECU to read/interpret the triggering.

Thanks for the feed back seems like other than price it doesn't have much down side. Since my current CAS is and old unit for R32 and I do have an R34 so I will have to get a new CAS anyways might as well go with Hall Sensors. But I wish there are direct plug and play without any splicing OEM wirings.

9 hours ago, etang789 said:

Other than price it doesn't have much down side.

I wish there are direct plug and play without any splicing OEM wirings.

The price is an investment in reliability and achieving whatever your mechanical layout and tuning capabilities will allow.  Who wants to blow an engine because of wildly scattered ignition at high rpm/load?

As for direct plug & play, forget it.  You're moving away from OEM spec so expect there's going to be some work involved.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's a post from a member (can't recall who), went down the path of a twin scroll G30-660 and it's doing over 300kW+ AND comes on about the same as a high flow RB25DET turbo. Have your cake and eat it too in this case. TBH, if I had a 2nd chance of building my car again (i.e. someone gave me what I wanted for my shit box, but the deal was I had to re-build another R33 and keep the change) I would just pop in a stock NEO motor (with new seals, rod bearings, ARP studs, head gasket, sump, Nitto pump), get a smaller twin scroll turbo, modify the stock low mount (keep the divider in place), and make a solid 300kW on 98RON and call it a day. 
    • It's all the sound deadening, and extra shit piled into them, plus all the extra (even though it's thinner) material for crumple zones. I can't fathom in modern cars why they need canbus to the headlights, and why the headlights must be vin coded on some cars to the ECU, BCM, and security module! Especially when they claim it's for security, yet, the canbus at the headlights let's thieves steal the car in minutes, so even more cars are being stolen! The Mercedes Sprinter 907 vans. They're a huge van, but a "basic" van. Yet they have that many canbus networks, plus two Lin networks, AND an Ethernet network. Logging a single network alone of 8 byte data frames, and they will generate a 20mb log file in 5 minutes. That's one network, and I can't remember the exact amount, but there's over 10 full CAN2.0B networks in them. I'm not a fan of modern cars, oddly, more and more I hate DBW, and all the bullshittery the cars try and interfere with. But all that bullshittery adds weight, plus crazy regulations on crumple zones, plus, ever picked a modern seat up, half of them have like 4 electric motors in them and will weigh 30+kg each. Then all the motors for things like adjustable steering columns blah blah blah. And did I mention the sound deadening so you can even hear an ambulance right behind you even if you 7.2surround sound is off?
    • Ah ok, yeah it should be flat, I believe the r34 battery tray has these 3 bumps in them they makes it line up and everything is flat, don't see how it would tilt if everything is secured.
    • Agreed it actively wants to kill you which I love driving fast cars slow is my stick
    • Awesome! I was thinking S14 since they are longer. I'll give those a shot. Thanks for the input!
×
×
  • Create New...