Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I am new to this site but not to Motorsports. Just wanted to include the dyno results of a car I have been assisting to build, and your thoughts would be appreciated.

To give some perspective, this car was built over a period of 3 years, and was tuned at the last minute late one night before heading to an event. As such, the tuning is not complete. It could be considered an advanced baseline tune but far from finished. 

We have yet to log data regarding the EGT's in each runner, no data on AFR's and the power graph is very wavey as the EBC was not functioning correctly. Unfortunately also, the x-axis is in km/h instead of RPM which I find difficult to use for extrapolating data on boost threshold etc,,,,anyway a quick mods list:

- 1JZ, stock longblock with exception of slip-in HKS 264 cams

- EFR 9180 TS Borg Warner

- 6 Boost exhaust manifold, 50mm Progate

- I built (360CF) the intake manifold w/75mm throttle body

- 360CF 4" intercooler

- 360CF 2.5" off turbo blending to 3" intercooler tubing

- 3.5" exhaust running catalytic converter and quiet baffled muffler

- Smallish air filter

- Microtech ECU and running E-85 tuned by Blacktrack

We will be doing further dyno testing without the cat and running just a straight exhaust, a larger air filter, new EBC and more datalogging of EGTs etc. you can see the boost fluctuations hurt the power curve, however the overall graph looks really impressive, the power shoots for the sky and just hangs in there. A real shame we can't see the RPM's but it seems to be spooling better than the GT35R's I've seen online and holding for longer up top as well.

640WHP was at (inconsistently) 26psi. With a few changes and refinements I have no doubt we can hit 700, though the stock internals must be close to their limit. Anyway, I have found very little on similar engines such as the RB running a similar setup that I can refer to, so any experience you may have would be appreciated.

IMG_2193.JPG

IMG_3227.JPG

Edited by 360CF
  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474166-1jz-9180-dyno-results/
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, PranK said:

Looks great! You're a busy person!

Thank you Prank. I realise this is a Nissan website, but posted hoping to find some comparative data to the RB's with similar setups as my google searches were showing very little. I have since found some great info on this site with cars running similar setups which is very useful ?

  • Like 1
Thank you Prank. I realise this is a Nissan website, but posted hoping to find some comparative data to the RB's with similar setups as my google searches were showing very little. I have since found some great info on this site with cars running similar setups which is very useful [emoji106]
Nissan Schmissan. All are welcome here.
  • 2 weeks later...

Attached is an extrapolated guide you can use with the 9180 comp map. You can see I've married up your existing results and PR by using the VE as a variable, it's actually still very realistic and what I'd expect from a 1J with decent intake and exhaust manifolds.

You can see you'll hit 700 by 30psi, and that should be achievable with the motor in its current configuration. However, the turbo has a lot more in it that your existing results show would require changes to the head and cam combo. IE 800 is accessible but you'd need to turn it well into the 8s.

Hope that helps. 

Screenshot_20180615-174345.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
×
×
  • Create New...