Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A long time ago, I fitted a RB25DET from a Stagea into my R32 GTS4. I've recently started wondering if there are any differences between the Stagea head and a GTSt head - eg, cam profile, cam timing, chamber shape / size, inlet / exhaust port shape / size.

Is it worth getting a GTSt head, or just GTSt cams, or it doesn't matter?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474189-rb25det-head-differences/
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

There's no differences in any of the vanilla RB25DET heads

Theres the answer, The R33 RB25 non turbo and turbo heads are essentially identical. The valve springs cams, valve size, port size etc are identical. These were used in series 1 Stagea. Neo is another story

Edited by Rusty Nuts
1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

And the next point is that you shouldn't put a Neo head on a vanilla block without considering the effect of 15% less volume in the combustion chamber.  Alright if you plan on using E85 only.

Sorta correct! all 33 series 1 and 2 and neo blocks are 75T casting No. blocks so are the same! All decompression is by piston fitted.

1 hour ago, Rusty Nuts said:

Sorta correct! all 33 series 1 and 2 and neo blocks are 75T casting No. blocks so are the same! All decompression is by piston fitted.

Should also add combined with different crank throws and different conrods

Thanks for calling a truce!

It is a S1 Stagea engine (probably equivalent to a S2 GTSt engine). Has VVT. Has been rebuilt with forged pistons.

Think I'll save some coin and not do anything to it ?

1 hour ago, Rusty Nuts said:

 A Neo head on your so called vanilla bottom end would achieve same compression as standard neo turbo and they dont need E85 is what i'm saying.

Um . No.  Just no.  Neo DET head has about 51cc chamber volume.  Vanilla has about 62 or something similar.  Jam a Neo head onto a vanilla bottom end and the compression ratio goes through the roof.  This is a known fact.  Neo pistons have much lower crown height because the chamber is flatter because that's one of he big changes made to make the Neo heads (on various engines).  It was about reducing the surface area of metal facing the combustion event.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
    • Uniclutch install vid, RB Track edition.   Highlight reel is very drive able, not noisy but still heavy with the clutch master he has.      
×
×
  • Create New...