Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A long time ago, I fitted a RB25DET from a Stagea into my R32 GTS4. I've recently started wondering if there are any differences between the Stagea head and a GTSt head - eg, cam profile, cam timing, chamber shape / size, inlet / exhaust port shape / size.

Is it worth getting a GTSt head, or just GTSt cams, or it doesn't matter?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474189-rb25det-head-differences/
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

There's no differences in any of the vanilla RB25DET heads

Theres the answer, The R33 RB25 non turbo and turbo heads are essentially identical. The valve springs cams, valve size, port size etc are identical. These were used in series 1 Stagea. Neo is another story

Edited by Rusty Nuts
1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

And the next point is that you shouldn't put a Neo head on a vanilla block without considering the effect of 15% less volume in the combustion chamber.  Alright if you plan on using E85 only.

Sorta correct! all 33 series 1 and 2 and neo blocks are 75T casting No. blocks so are the same! All decompression is by piston fitted.

1 hour ago, Rusty Nuts said:

Sorta correct! all 33 series 1 and 2 and neo blocks are 75T casting No. blocks so are the same! All decompression is by piston fitted.

Should also add combined with different crank throws and different conrods

Thanks for calling a truce!

It is a S1 Stagea engine (probably equivalent to a S2 GTSt engine). Has VVT. Has been rebuilt with forged pistons.

Think I'll save some coin and not do anything to it ?

1 hour ago, Rusty Nuts said:

 A Neo head on your so called vanilla bottom end would achieve same compression as standard neo turbo and they dont need E85 is what i'm saying.

Um . No.  Just no.  Neo DET head has about 51cc chamber volume.  Vanilla has about 62 or something similar.  Jam a Neo head onto a vanilla bottom end and the compression ratio goes through the roof.  This is a known fact.  Neo pistons have much lower crown height because the chamber is flatter because that's one of he big changes made to make the Neo heads (on various engines).  It was about reducing the surface area of metal facing the combustion event.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah no bearings, just slip fit.  Would be a reasonably challenging but not impossible job to modify it to run bearings but I'm hoping that's not necessary as I may have well built one myself if I end up spending hours modifying it!
    • Brumbys with good shells are bloody expensive, I've looked at 2 "cheaper" cars, and walked away from both,  plus after some research spare parts are fairly sparce I'm starting to think that I missed the boat on finding a clean one that is straight (ish) and without alot rust I'm starting to think about a old Hilux as panels and other parts are much more available as they sold tens of thousands of them I use to be indecisive but now I'm not sure
    • A Brumby would probably fit a big metal toolbox in the back... this is how it begins  
    • Picked up a new OEM boot seal for the MX5 today as the old one got ripped a bit by me being a idiot by seeing if I could fit a large metal tool box in it, it didn't fit, and ripped the seal with the corner of the tool box I am still waiting on time to get the cams and new balancer installed, as well as the repairs to the boot Time will not be an issue soon though
    • I was more thinking so it doesn't flop around as much rather than for rotating it. Once you have the balance right, it should rotate well enough, depending on how much resistance there is on the pivot. I think you said the pivot point was on a bearing though didn't you?
×
×
  • Create New...