Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We were in this position when we researched on how much the stock fuel lines can flow. With limited information, we decided to do the testing ourselves and share it with the community. As always, if you spot a mistake, please advise us and we will be happy to amend.

 

Author: 5-0 IGNITE  

Original article from our website; https://www.50ignite.com/blog/technical-blog/article-2-pressure-is-sky-high/

Article 2: Pressure is Sky HIGH! - Flow Limits of Stock Fuel Lines main imageArticle 2: Pressure is Sky HIGH! - Flow Limits of Stock Fuel Lines image

 

A POINTLESS EXERCISE

#justsenditmate

image.png.5e3e9a581f584492559ce49182e9000f.png

Figure 1 - The boat on the dyno

 

Those who pondered on why we stopped at 603whp/27 psi on the project R33 GTR read on….

 

It wasn’t by choice, we were limited. When we built this car, we had one vision to go by; STREET DRIVEN.

 

For anyone who desires a go-fast-boosted street car - you will always come across the tough decision of which turbo should you go for and how important the turbo's response is. You are not at the track, you need those down-low torque or at the very least, a strong mid-range for performing street duties and occassional track days. There is no fun in it over-selecting the biggest and (inherently) laggier size turbo you could afford only to be chopped by a Honda until you hit that 6000rpm. We don’t condone street racing but the truth is, any car enthusiast regardless of age or gender will give it a squirt once in a while.

We selected a compromise of power and response on the RB26. We love our Garrett, Turbosmart, 6Boost, Tomei and Haltech products. Looking at very few compressor maps on Garrett GTX Gen 1 turbos (this was 2016 mind you) and drawing lines based on flow and pressure ratio to find the right efficiency on ‘What if’ power level, we settled on the GTX35R with 1.06 twin scroll rear housing. This turbo was chosen after much discussion and thought, we concurred that it won’t be too laggy of a turbo setup and should yield about 650hp at the wheels on the small but mighty 2.6L.

From there onwards, a forged internals build started and supporting mods were chosen; 6Boost twin scroll manifold, Plazmaman intercooler, Tomei cams, Turbosmart fuel regulator, Turbosmart external gate, Turbosmart BOV, Bosch motorsport injectors, 3 Walbro 460lph fuel pumps (1 lift and 2 feed, in parallel configuration) for E85 and so on and so forth.

 

We had a stop to think, with this much fuel feeding the beast, how much can the stock fuel lines be able to cope? Can it flow enough to match the fuel delivery?

 

The answer to that question at that time was simply #YOLO (we don’t have Instagram by the way) and #justsenditmate. Information on the internet as to “how much does 5/16” (8mm) fuel line can flow at xx pressure” was sketchy at best and inputs from the forums were a pure guess based on “my dad’s friend’s uncle’s setup” etc. Nothing was solid or backed with numbers, so we thought that it would be a good opportunity to see how much indeed stock fuel lines could flow and answer the question for the world.

During the last tuning session at WTF Auto, Tristan dialled in 30 psi on the Haltech. The dyno session stopped not long after, as fuel pressure dropped the moment we hit full boost. We re-checked the fuel pressure at the FPR and checked the fuel pressure at the fuel pump outlet. The pressure at the FPR was 55psi base, exactly to how it was set, but the pressure at the pump outlet was 90psi. That is a shocking 35psi pressure drop across the hard lines! The over-pressure relieve valve on the Walbro 450 LPH is set at 120psi from factory, so if we are sitting at 90 psi base pressure on the fuel pump outlet and we add 30psi of boost to the system, quick math shows 90+30=120 psi - all adds up to trip the relieve valve. This is why fuel pressure dropped the moment we hit full boost at 30psi.

 

image.png.33f8487b5a0c3caf69b08f5f653c9128.png

Figure 2 - Power limit before stock fuel lines can't handle

 

If you have read this article this far, congratulations! Because we are about to bore you even more!

 

To understand what was going on, we needed to do some quick measurements and look at fluid dynamics.

 

It is somewhat valid to some degree to assumed that most Japanese cars that run 5/16” (8mm) outside diameter fuel line (bar the soft lines). Fluid flow and head (pressure) losses can be contributed by major and minor losses in the system;

Major loss - Head losses due to friction within the pipe affected by flow velocity, pipe length, pipe diameter, pipe surface roughness and the viscosity of the fluid being transferred.

Minor loss – Head losses due to friction and flow disturbances within the system affected by components such as couplers, entry condition, bends, valves, filters, diaphragm etc.

To keep things simple, we analysed the major losses in the system only as it will always be the predominant cause of pressure loss. With different fuel system setups differing from car to car and the type and number of fittings used, the minor losses cannot be determined accurately without physical flow testing.

Since we are running the 2 feed pumps in parallel, the theoretical flow rate is just compounded. Remember, pressure is a resistance to flow.

 

image.png.b7059246069bd1a26190203d967afd40.png

Figure 3 - Walbro 450 LPH performance chart (Walbro 2018)

 

image.png.0e58d077d3eeaa999c1cd87e7777723f.png

 

image.png.754462baecf82960e9d0528f26f5f313.png

 

image.png.332147f9196fa9bb0982c2db39f70e67.png

 

Analysis of the friction factor for turbulent flow inside a smooth wall pipe using Moody chart;

image.png.7a5d66b3a874d572aa6822c6d7426ee2.png

(S. Beck & R. Collins, University of Sheffield 2018)

 

From the two intersecting lines above, we can find that the friction factor is approximately 0.048.

 

image.png.906edb9a0e60dbd3718ed37d7b584c7d.png

 

Conclusion

 

The theoretical, calculated value for the pressure drop of 31.5 psi strongly correlates to the 35 psi observed on the vehicle. Bear in mind, that only major losses are calculated, safe to say the remaining 3.5 psi drop can be attributed to minor losses in the system.

So, how much flow can the stock fuel line take without too much pressure drop? Well, it highly depends on what you define as "too much" pressure drop. We set an expectation that the fuel system should not have more than 8 to 10 psi drop between the fuel pump outlet and the regulator. Working backwards with the equations above in the instance of running the same Walbro 450 LPH, we find that the maximum flow rate shall not exceed 0.000066 m³/s (238LPH). This is equivalent to running a single Walbro 450 LPH pump at 95 psi!

Moving forward, the next step is to upgrade the fuel lines to AN -10 size (~12.7mm internal diameter) and increase the boost to 35 psi (however, we expect that the turbo will run out of steam before this). The base fuel pressure will remain at 55 psi with the two existing pumps blazing and the fuel pressure at the regulator, at full boost, should be at 90 psi. At that pressure, the twin Walbro pumps should be able to flow 536 LPH (0.000149 m³/s) with a pressure drop of approximately 1 psi due to major losses. Minor losess within the system should also decrease as all the fittings and liners in the vehicle will be converted to AN -10.

 

 

References

 

Curtin University. 2015. Fluid Mechanics 433 Course Notes - Lecture 1. Perth.

S. Beck & R. Collins, University of Sheffield. 2018. Moody Chart. 26 07. Accessed 08 29, 2018. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody_chart#/media/File:Moody_EN.svg.

Slurry Pipes. 2018. Pipe Roughness. 29 08. Accessed 08 29, 2018. http://slurrypipes.com.au/properties/low-friction/.

Walbro. 2018. Walbro F90000267 Performance Chart. 29 08. Accessed 08 29, 2018. https://walbrofuelpumps.com/walbro-f90000267-fuel-pump-e85.

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474826-limits-of-stock-516-8mm-fuel-lines/
Share on other sites

Baffled with science.  Not quite sure what to conclude from your testing. Most people run 18 to 25 psi and want to know how much power they can achieve before having to change fuel lines. Anyone  building a serious drag car or a drift machine where they will spend a lot of time at WOT  will probably change the fuel system as a matter of course.

On 8/31/2018 at 3:36 PM, KiwiRS4T said:

Baffled with science.  Not quite sure what to conclude from your testing. Most people run 18 to 25 psi and want to know how much power they can achieve before having to change fuel lines. Anyone  building a serious drag car or a drift machine where they will spend a lot of time at WOT  will probably change the fuel system as a matter of course.

Ahh yes. Anybody building a serious track weapon would upgrade more than just the fuel lines. Majority of the owners have their car street driven and upgrading fuel lines to a bigger one whilst keeping road worthy could be a challenge and expensive. How much boost you run is important on selecting the right fuel pump for your application (making sure it can flow at xx psi) but not to sizing the fuel line. To keep it simple;

- From the above, we determined that the maximum flow is 238 LPH with approximately 8.5 psi pressure drop (it can flow more but with significant pressure drop).

- 238 litres per hour is 3967cc/min.

 

To have a rough estimate on how much power it can handle on the 6 cylinder application, we apply the rule of thumb just like how we size injectors. 3967/6 = 661cc/min. For typical 6 cyl, 660cc injectors can normally output 660hp at the wheels on 98 RON.

  • Like 2

Wow! Thats awesome information, tried to guestimate/calculate the same thing when I refreshed my fuel system, but it ended up a bit low compared to the real numbers you found! Attached image is of stock fuelrail inlet/outlet vs AN8 fitting... Notice the sharp and narrow left connection?

Got myself some AN8 lines in the end, should be enough for me and my 530 LPH pump :)

IMG_20160223_211945.jpg

Edited by K_arlstrom
Attached image
  • Like 1
4 hours ago, K_arlstrom said:

Wow! Thats awesome information, tried to guestimate/calculate the same thing when I refreshed my fuel system, but it ended up a bit low compared to the real numbers you found! Attached image is of stock fuelrail inlet/outlet vs AN8 fitting... Notice the sharp and narrow left connection?

Got myself some AN8 lines in the end, should be enough for me and my 530 LPH pump :)

IMG_20160223_211945.jpg

If you are running -8AN all the way (~9.5mm inside diameter), with flow of 530 LPH, the approximate pressure drop would be 4.5 psi. This will be reduced if you are running teflon hoses or reduced the total length.

13 hours ago, 5-0 Ignite said:

If you are running -8AN all the way (~9.5mm inside diameter), with flow of 530 LPH, the approximate pressure drop would be 4.5 psi. This will be reduced if you are running teflon hoses or reduced the total length.

Teflon hoses and as straight and short as possible aluminum pipe. Fuelab 41402 pump, dont know what gallons they used in the attached chart, but it should suffice any day of the week ? (got a vision/goal of everything being able to handle 500 awkw on E85)

My rough calculation told me I would end up with a 3 psi drop, but anything below 5 feels acceptable. Someone should sticky this thread :)

Fuel-pump-comparison.jpg

  • 6 months later...

I'm making 500awkw on e85. stock fuel lines, stock nissan fuel filter, stock rail, tomei type-L and bosch 1650s.

single in-tank pierburg L3LM @ 17.5v (boost-a-pump), range rover PWM pump controller and an aftermarket fuel hat. holley hydromat on tank floor.

very efficient pump at high pressures. can only just hear it prime before starting the car. once engine running its effectively silent.

not sure on pressure drop but don't care either. ECU uses injector delta pressure in model.

Edited by burn4005
  • 2 years later...

As someone who has dealt with fuel system issues over the years, I thought I'd bump this information. A lot of people should read this as it answers a lot of questions regarding fuel system setup.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It was roughly 3.5 hours.    car went in around 11:00 and I was done around 2:30 He did the initial runs, install the BC and then Nistune install and tune.  The best part was sitting in the lobby and hearing the skyline on full throttle at the dyno 😂😂
    • Glad it all went smooth. How long did the tuning process take?
    • Yeah that was kind of the same feedback my tuner gave me.  the boost tee is until I can sort out my plan for the electronic boost controller and what I’d get, where I’d mount the dash etc.  I’m happy with this until I can figure it out. Not a big fan of the A-pillar gauges. I’d like to get a clean install of the boost gauge - something digital like GFB.  Something like that might fit neatly where the ashtray is and look clean. I feel like replacing the OEM triple gauge is a bit extreme for a weekender like my skyline. And it’s not making crazy power to need all the additional sensors/gauges. 
    • I'm about to swap my box to Tremec T56 Magnum F & initially thinking of re-using my DCS twin plate (can get it re centred for the bigger spline) but it's been called out the box will be noisy (rattle) as the clutch is unsprung.  So I'm doing as much research as possible. I'm not so worried about holding the power as I'll go the track version which on paper will hold the maybe 1000hp I make. It's the longevity I worry about. DCS told me they don't use a sprung centre as it's just something that can break. The uni clutch has a very complicated sprung centre. Any one had or heard about any issues with it failing? Thanks in advance.
    • Auto is at least 10% (from my real, actual experience with different torque converters and manual on the same setup) ~185rwkw at 11.6psi (peak!) is entirely what one would expect without a FMIC or anything else on the intake, it does bleed off towards the higher RPM so it's what, 9psi there? Note: There is nothing that can be done about this with a manual boost tee. If you want to hold it steady and gain more top end, well - You will need electronic boost control.....
×
×
  • Create New...