Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So this is more of a curiosity than anything else, but i figured id ask.

We all know cars are tuned rich from the factory, for safety, my question is, can you increase boost safely without tuning the car? Common sense would suggest no, but is it possible? Has anyone done this?

Ive got a 92 GTSt with an RB20 and considering the lack of tuneability with the stock ECU (originally came from the world of open source tuning subarus), can you dial in 1 or 2 psi safely without actually going to a NIStune or standalone and not compromise AFR pr ultimately your engine?

Hopefully someone has some answer cause here in the states i mostly get a blank stare and "dunno".

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/474980-untuned-boost-increase/
Share on other sites

One or two extra psi will not kill your car. More than 10 or 12 may kill your turbo. People routinely increase boost to 10 psi usually without problem (there are no guarantees in this business). But since you will inevitably want more power down the track consider getting a Nistune chip anyway☺️

I'm pretty sure you can.........

My mate has an R32 GT-R that was 100% stock including radio and exhaust.

He added a boost controller and cat back exhaust and picked up approx 25awk.

No tuning was done. I think the problem will start if you start changing injectors etc.

Just ring any respectable tuning mob and they will tell you.

Cheers...... Bob.

2 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

One or two extra psi will not kill your car. More than 10 or 12 may kill your turbo. People routinely increase boost to 10 psi usually without problem (there are no guarantees in this business). But since you will inevitably want more power down the track consider getting a Nistune chip anyway☺️

I thought stock boost WAS 10 psi?

I was told the stock turbo was prone to breakage over 13 psi?

Im going full stand alone but thats down the road so im more curious whats possible as is with just a little fiddling. I have an old Perrin Manual boost controller from an old Subaru Liberty build

Edited by Hcr32typem

It should be fairly happy with 12psi. Just remember to reset ur ecu by taking the battery off for 10 min with headlights turned on. Then let it learn. Stock is 10psi with decent exhaust and intake. Dead stock about 8psi

Wow.  So much information in this thread that is just a little bit wrong (except for one post above - I'll leave you guys to work out which one I'm talking about).  And this after the real information has been known for like.....25 years.

Point 1.  Resetting an R32 ECU by pulling the power and putting it back on after long enough for the capacitors to drain has precisely zero useful effect.  The ECU will lose its learnt long term fuel trims, which will possibly make it run worse in the immediate short term.  But whether you do the zap or not, the ECU will learn the trims back to wherever they need to be AT THE SAME SPEED!  it might even take longer if you flatten the caps.

Point 2.  R32 ceramic turbos, like all other ceramic turns, can die at ANY BOOST LEVEL AT ALL.  At any age and after any usage history they can die at stock boost (10 psi), or anything up to 20 psi.  If you choose to try to run it at 20 psi it will probably die within a few minutes.  I ran mine at 14 psi for years and years.  In the middle of that it even ran for a while at 17 psi for a while.  I consider myself lucky that it didn't explode at 17.  But it was fine at 14.  Others have exploded for no apparent reason without being boosted.

Point 3.  Nissan ECUs of the era are tuned very rich and very retarded in the top-right hand corner of the maps.  They are of course rich in the normal stock area of the maps, and they only get richer as you add boost.  This is not a good thing.  This does not mean that you have "fuelling" to spare to keep adding boost without worrying about a tune.  The problems are in fact multiple;

a) Rich is slow.  You can add boost and not get any extra power.  What you are doing is wasting fuel.  I ran 14 psi for ages without tuning the car.  With Nistune in it and all the extra fuel removed from the top end of the map, it made 15 rwkW more.

b) If you look at the RB20 fuel maps in Nistune, you can see how much of the top right corner of the map is actually aimed at 100% injector duty cycle or more.  What this means is that there isn't actually as much "spare capacity" as people expect.  All that is required is that the fuel pump goes a bit soft or the filter gets a bit too dirty and you can very rapidly fall off the rich cliff into the lean ocean and toast the engine.  And people who run their cars like this very seldom have any form of AFR monitoring installed.

c) There's more, but thinking about the nature of the problems is self-educatory.  So worth a try anyway.

  • Thanks 1
19 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Wow.  So much information in this thread that is just a little bit wrong (except for one post above - I'll leave you guys to work out which one I'm talking about).  And this after the real information has been known for like.....25 years.

Point 1.  Resetting an R32 ECU by pulling the power and putting it back on after long enough for the capacitors to drain has precisely zero useful effect.  The ECU will lose its learnt long term fuel trims, which will possibly make it run worse in the immediate short term.  But whether you do the zap or not, the ECU will learn the trims back to wherever they need to be AT THE SAME SPEED!  it might even take longer if you flatten the caps.

Point 2.  R32 ceramic turbos, like all other ceramic turns, can die at ANY BOOST LEVEL AT ALL.  At any age and after any usage history they can die at stock boost (10 psi), or anything up to 20 psi.  If you choose to try to run it at 20 psi it will probably die within a few minutes.  I ran mine at 14 psi for years and years.  In the middle of that it even ran for a while at 17 psi for a while.  I consider myself lucky that it didn't explode at 17.  But it was fine at 14.  Others have exploded for no apparent reason without being boosted.

Point 3.  Nissan ECUs of the era are tuned very rich and very retarded in the top-right hand corner of the maps.  They are of course rich in the normal stock area of the maps, and they only get richer as you add boost.  This is not a good thing.  This does not mean that you have "fuelling" to spare to keep adding boost without worrying about a tune.  The problems are in fact multiple;

a) Rich is slow.  You can add boost and not get any extra power.  What you are doing is wasting fuel.  I ran 14 psi for ages without tuning the car.  With Nistune in it and all the extra fuel removed from the top end of the map, it made 15 rwkW more.

b) If you look at the RB20 fuel maps in Nistune, you can see how much of the top right corner of the map is actually aimed at 100% injector duty cycle or more.  What this means is that there isn't actually as much "spare capacity" as people expect.  All that is required is that the fuel pump goes a bit soft or the filter gets a bit too dirty and you can very rapidly fall off the rich cliff into the lean ocean and toast the engine.  And people who run their cars like this very seldom have any form of AFR monitoring installed.

c) There's more, but thinking about the nature of the problems is self-educatory.  So worth a try anyway.

Appreciate the info! This is the kind of info were lacking in the US. Its true that people have been swapping RBs into various cars here but the general knowledge base is very thin.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
×
×
  • Create New...