Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

So I was cleaning my R34 GTR the other day and thought I'd do a check on all the lights and discovered that the rear registration light had one blown bulb. I think they're stock halogen ones and I've never bothered to check them as I rarely drive this at night. So replacing them is a must but this begs the question should I leave them stockish halogen yellow or upgrade to LED bright white?

I front lights are LED globes so are relatively brighter white (not a fan of HIDs) so rear LEDs would suit but I've seen a few cars with them on and it looks like a midnight disco ball which attracts a lot of attention and looks a bit flashy then again the stock lights on cars like the Mercs have LEDs on the rear but they look nice and more tame. 

What do you guys think and what have you done on yours? Photos would be great.

Cheers,

Alex

Image result for r34 gtr licence plate lights

Related image

 

 

Edited by Robocop2310

Not halogen.  Just normal automotive incandescents.  Halogen bulbs are in headlights.

Old cars like ours should not have LED lights anywhere on the outside.  Looks cheap and nasty and wrong.  Warm white auto bulbs for parkers, number plates etc.  LEDs are good for brake lights if you can get ones that illuminate the housing properly (which is rare).  LEDs for indicators need careful selection to make sure that they have suitable resistance to flash at the proper rate.  All in all, not worth the pain in the arse to try.  Globes work fine.

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Not halogen.  Just normal automotive incandescents.  Halogen bulbs are in headlights.

Old cars like ours should not have LED lights anywhere on the outside.  Looks cheap and nasty and wrong.  Warm white auto bulbs for parkers, number plates etc.  LEDs are good for brake lights if you can get ones that illuminate the housing properly (which is rare).  LEDs for indicators need careful selection to make sure that they have suitable resistance to flash at the proper rate.  All in all, not worth the pain in the arse to try.  Globes work fine.

Awesome honest opinion mate thanks.

So just regular T1 whiter globes or just keep them the same do you think?

Which gloves do you have?

Cheers!

6 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

I have just normal T1s in the front and regular globes in the rear.

Thanks mate. I think I'll just replace the blown regular globe with the exact same one and leave it at that. 

I went out to dinner this evening and saw a VW Golf GTI with LED rear licence plate lights and they looked awful. 

On 10/20/2018 at 10:26 AM, GTSBoy said:

Not halogen.  Just normal automotive incandescents.  Halogen bulbs are in headlights.

Old cars like ours should not have LED lights anywhere on the outside.  Looks cheap and nasty and wrong.  Warm white auto bulbs for parkers, number plates etc.  LEDs are good for brake lights if you can get ones that illuminate the housing properly (which is rare).  LEDs for indicators need careful selection to make sure that they have suitable resistance to flash at the proper rate.  All in all, not worth the pain in the arse to try.  Globes work fine.

Excuse you sir, Philips 4000K LEDs look just fine on my R32, although I do have HID projectors with OE Philips D2S bulbs.

Although they are quite expensive (~$25 a pair for T10) so not worth it unless they're on sale.

The issue of firing pattern has been brought up, so better to stick to standard incandescent bulbs. I only have the parkers and interior lights in LED.

On 10/22/2018 at 10:52 AM, niZmO_Man said:

Excuse you sir, Philips 4000K LEDs look just fine on my R32, although I do have HID projectors with OE Philips D2S bulbs.

Although they are quite expensive (~$25 a pair for T10) so not worth it unless they're on sale.

The issue of firing pattern has been brought up, so better to stick to standard incandescent bulbs. I only have the parkers and interior lights in LED.

Thanks mate totally agree.

So I went off to Supercheap and bought a pair of Philips T1 bulbs that are non LED but is a little brighter calked Diamond vision or something. Fitted them on and made the GTR’s rear light up line a Xmas tree. I went back to the stock yellow globes that I had laying around and it looked much better in my opinion.

Just shows just because something is popular or newer doesn’t mean it will suit everyone’s taste. Personally, I hate yellow as front and parker lights but they definitely suit the rear licence plate area.

 

4 hours ago, niZmO_Man said:

Which is why I like the Philips 'vision' T10, they aren't brighter than incandescent and have a good spread pattern (essentially emulating the incandescent). Essentially look like LEDs out of a 2005-ish Lexus.

Totally agree. 

Good lesson learned from this exercise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...