Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was cleaning out the boot of my r32 looking for any tools or supplies that might’ve fell into the  spare tire well. I found these that the previous owner might’ve left there? Lol. Anyways don’t know what they do or are worth but I found their website and apparently they are a Canadian product. 

9F29BF38-B91D-4F59-B624-6DC1C9F31D42.png

B9517AF4-9E3E-43A8-B551-FE64C601749E.jpeg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475267-ams-tention-rods/
Share on other sites

The caster rods control the fore-aft movement of the front lower control arm.  Without them, the lower control arm would be able to move forward and backwards in the wheel well enough to crash into the guard liner, because the bushes at the chassis end of the arm aren't designed to take loads applied in that direction.

The stock caster rods are fixed length.  No adjusting them.  The stock amount of caster in these Nissans is a bit low - only a few degrees.  More (positive) caster provides an increase in the amount of dynamic camber (camber that appears in the wheel angle as the wheel is turned in the steering axis).

The stock caster rods also feature huge rubber/hydrogooshy bushes that provide a metric shit tonne of slop.

These aftermarket caster rods provide the ability to adjust the length to get the amount of caster that you want*.  They also usually use rod end joints in place of squishy bushes, thereby completely eradicating any deflection under load.  In my experience, this is f**king Excellent (TM), as it drastically improves the behaviour of the front end.

* R32s in particular do not like having lots of caster wound into them.  You can wind more into R33s because the upper control arm design is superior.  The more you wind into an R32 the worse the twisting/binding that occurs in the upper arm and shit starts to get real with them, much worse/faster.  Therefore the limit for caster on R32s is probably 6°.  I think I'm running ~5.5°, even with tricky upper arms.

8 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

The caster rods control the fore-aft movement of the front lower control arm.  Without them, the lower control arm would be able to move forward and backwards in the wheel well enough to crash into the guard liner, because the bushes at the chassis end of the arm aren't designed to take loads applied in that direction.

The stock caster rods are fixed length.  No adjusting them.  The stock amount of caster in these Nissans is a bit low - only a few degrees.  More (positive) caster provides an increase in the amount of dynamic camber (camber that appears in the wheel angle as the wheel is turned in the steering axis).

The stock caster rods also feature huge rubber/hydrogooshy bushes that provide a metric shit tonne of slop.

These aftermarket caster rods provide the ability to adjust the length to get the amount of caster that you want*.  They also usually use rod end joints in place of squishy bushes, thereby completely eradicating any deflection under load.  In my experience, this is f**king Excellent (TM), as it drastically improves the behaviour of the front end.

* R32s in particular do not like having lots of caster wound into them.  You can wind more into R33s because the upper control arm design is superior.  The more you wind into an R32 the worse the twisting/binding that occurs in the upper arm and shit starts to get real with them, much worse/faster.  Therefore the limit for caster on R32s is probably 6°.  I think I'm running ~5.5°, even with tricky upper arms.

Hmm so these are for thE fronts eh? I would’ve assumed for the rears. 

2 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Definitely the front.  The equivalents on the rears are called "tension rods" in these cars.  You do not want to f**k about with those.  I have written many words on that subject lately, if you want a read.

And would obviously require an alignment after install yes?  Also with my new coilovers when they come in after I install them even though I’m matching the ore existing ride height do I need a re alignment?

5 minutes ago, SeanR32GtSt said:

And would obviously require an alignment after install yes?  Also with my new coilovers when they come in after I install them even though I’m matching the ore existing ride height do I need a re alignment?

If you set the length of the AMS rods to exactly the length of the stockers (to the centreline of the bolt hole through the front joint) then you won't need an alignment afterwards.  The paranoid would at least get the alignment checked, but the confident would expect the alignment to be unchanged.  Doing so would buy the benefits of reduced slop, but not the potential benefit of winding in a little more caster.  Shortening the rods would best be done AT the wheel aligners, to get the measurement you want.  If you don't know what you want, don't f**k with it.  There is plenty of reading on here to inform you though.

Changing suspension units, even with a small height change, will not require a wheel alignment.  Again, the paranoid would check, the confident would just run with it.

1 hour ago, SeanR32GtSt said:

Is there anything missing from these that would need replacing like a bush inside the endlinks before attempting to install?  And do they actually make a rattling noise?

Now that you mention it....yes, the pair of spacers that goes in the rod end on each one is missing.

Perhaps you should check to see if you have stock arm on the car, or another set of these.

And yes, when rod ends wear, you get metal to metal knocking noises.

36 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Now that you mention it....yes, the pair of spacers that goes in the rod end on each one is missing.

Perhaps you should check to see if you have stock arm on the car, or another set of these.

And yes, when rod ends wear, you get metal to metal knocking noises.

I’ll be getting under it in a few days to check. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
    • It does when you start adding everything else in. But it's not just compute. It's the logic. Getting your timing right (I'm not meaning ignition timing for the engine). Making sure of your memory mappings, seeing your interrupts. Microcontroller devices only have so much capacity. For the most part, you want all those timers and interrupts in use on your engine control, which means you're left with less than ideal methods for timing and management of other control functions.   Let's put it this way, my job is all about building custom hardware, that goes into cars, and integrates with them. We're also waiting on a media confirmation from SpaceX too fora world first we've just completed with them in NZ too. It's not just the little toys I play with. But you know, you can think and believe what you want.
    • I don't think it's a good buy, the trend looks bad     lol.
×
×
  • Create New...