Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Chasing up a dyno sheet so we can do a little more analysis.

reality is I need stronger wastegates, but the car is just a response monster and it pulls like a freight train, I really don’t need the extra power just yet...especially when a C63 AMG couldn’t hold a candle to this don mega build....

1 hour ago, BakemonoRicer said:

Ben, yes Nismo R1 turbos on the car.

Everyone says they're akin to -7's but that makes no sense, I'm making 30kw more than what people estimated.

They certainly didn't let the Nissan out in this build Benny, because they built it with mostly stock engine components. ProSTOCK build. Even stock ECU ?‍♂️

  • Like 1

Well they put the fruit in the head. But I wish the bottom end was more fruity...

I'm suprised the owner didn't pay the little bit extra to run a set of forged rods......

Scott did laugh at the tune. The japs just love to throw a lot of fuel into it and be done with it.

 

That's about normal boost response for those size of turbos I thought? Especially when you have a half decent head. Remember manifold pressure does not equal lb/min of flow, it just means the turbos have pressurised the intake to that level. What's more important is rear wheel torque at 3900pm or wherever you're wanting to measure from. 

My head was stock, but I had cams and gears and  it made about 20psi at 38-3900 rpm on it's way to 24-25psi, which it almost held to redline. As per my opther comments, the turbos were at their limit and being outflowed, just like yours (mine were newer spec -9s with the better centre cartridge). 

Traffic light grand prix is fun, just don't blow 3rd :D

785nm of torque mate.
Don't want to take anything away from the result but it aint 785nm. Dyno was not set to derived torque which is the accurate at wheel reading on mainlines. Its more like 550-570nm which is still pretty stout.
On 14/07/2019 at 6:17 PM, BakemonoRicer said:

Ben, yes Nismo R1 turbos on the car.

Everyone says they're akin to -7's but that makes no sense, I'm making 30kw more than what people estimated.

You absolutely sure they are Nismo R1 then ? Output of over 350kw at only 20psi on 98ron seems very high does it not ? Also can you tell me how is R1 different than -7 turbos ? The specs supplied look identical to me. If I am missing something enlighten me as I am curious. Also your derived torque is on the bottom graph of your dyno sheet which is clearly under 600Nm as mentioned.

Nismo R1 Turbo: (Specs from RHD Japan)

Compressor Housing: T3 (A/R 0.42)
Compressor Wheel: T3 (Trim 55)
Bearing: Ball Bearing
Turbine Housing: T25 (A/R 0.64)
Turbine Wheel: GT25 (Trim 62)

Max. efficiency: 73%
Max. air pressure ratio (at boost pressure): 103% (1.35kg/cm2)


Garrett 707160-7 Turbo: (specs from Garrett)

Compressor Housing: T3 (A/R 0.42)
Compressor Wheel: T3 (Trim 55) - Ind: 44.5mm - Exd: 60.0mm
Bearing: Ball Bearing
Turbine Housing: T25 (A/R 0.64)
Turbine Wheel: GT25 (Trim 62) - Wheel Dia: 53.8mm

As abov Benny, Derived Torque is different. 

Here's an earlier graph before we finished tuning the car (it only ended up going to 380) and as you can see, and knowing the setup, there's no way it was making a genuine 1000Nm lol 

It was "zippy" but I wouldn't have called it a torque monster, it was only a 2.6 in the end. 

20170522_201505.jpg.305f37c5f5378da8355f9b640c5ba425.jpg

12 hours ago, admS15 said:
13 hours ago, BakemonoRicer said:
785nm of torque mate.

Don't want to take anything away from the result but it aint 785nm. Dyno was not set to derived torque which is the accurate at wheel reading on mainlines. Its more like 550-570nm which is still pretty stout.

am i missing something, it says derived torque on the dyno sheet?

yeah that's right it does show derived torque, just not at 785nm . Dunno where 785nm come from as the derived torque graph clearly shows increments of 50nm vertical blocks, and is labelled as such with 200 at 4th block, 400 at 8th block and has 11 blocks shown. So just under top of 11th block is about 540nm, similar to around what admS15 mentioned. I'm still intrigued at the 356.4kw at wheels on 20psi with 98. I have GT-SS turbos on my 33 which are almost the same turbo as -7 / R1 except with a larger compressor trim of 56 (vs R1 with 55 trim) and I can't get near that.

Usually it dynos at 310 - 330kw on 98ron at 22psi. Runs mid 11s at anywhere between 116 and 120mph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because all parts that are put into your papers usually are assigned a badging if they did not come with one. So other people can just check that badging to tell if it is the parts your papes outline. But my pipe has NOTHING on it whatsoever. No idea why this even passed as a Mines pipe to begin with. I see this going two ways: -nobody cares and it's a non-issue, but that is unlikely -the pipe will just have to be assigned a bagding, for sake of argument, a Mines logo, and the papers corrected accordingly If it interests you I will post what the actual solution ended up being. All I care about is that it has to sound equal length and nobody can screw me later on because of a pipe being illegal.
    • The fasteners to the pipe are not subject to TÜV I guess, if we really start putting nuts and bolts through technical tests I'm going to hang the people responsible and then myself. Usually on a modern-ish EU normed car, you would just replace the pipe. Because if you start hacking away at it and welding new pieces on the cops will definitely find a reason to tow your car. That is just how it is sadly. On old cars and imports with no clear "standard" stuff like that won't matter too much. Most cops or inspectors probably won't even really know what they are looking at. But there is experts for this stuff even among cops, and some of them know the rules to a T and even have extensive knowledge about many vehicles. For "just a pipe" to be legal it usually is included in a set of parts, like a complete intake kit or a full exhaust. For example my exhaust needs to pass a noise test, meaning they have a standardized test track with a set of instructions and they run the car through there 3x for an average noise value that is 75dB(a) at point x of the test track. If it's above that, fail. For a turbo setup to be put in your papers you have to do dyno runs, emissions testing etc. So quite costly
    • Would this not be the same for the exhaust you've posted up?  If your exhaust volume and emissions are fine, why does the brand of pipe matter? 
    • The issue is more the fact that there is inspectors that deal with japanese cars a lot and they might know what a real Mines pipe looks like. And then they're gonna get antsy and not pass your car. But I'd have to talk to one of them about this, because you know as well as me that it's just a damn pipe and it effectively doesn't do anything. As I need to have my GT2860s and my exhaust setup (and the increase in HP) TÜV'd anyways maybe they can just correct the entry in the papers or assign a badge to the front pipe. I'm no expert either though, will inquire about this.     Thanks for the insight. Not sure if having a custom made pipe is good or not. Will find out in due time I suppose. Would be kind of funny if this was made in Germany though.
    • See this is a really tricky topic as technically the same rules apply to all cars but for cars but there is a difference. If you want to modify a car like the Skyline which never existed here you have a bit more freedom as they do not adhere to EU specs anyway. Any modification you do has to be in dividually checked anyway so as long as one of the inspectors think it's ok and within the TÜV ruleset you can get stuff like a top secret rear diffuser put in your papers. Which frankly would need a shitload of tests and certificates for EU spec cars, like a 2010 BMW M3 for example. But if you DO run these tests and all tests come out ok (safety stuff for the most part) there is no problem running such a part legally. It's just way too expensive to do for a single person on one car. The most touchy parts are emissions related mods, like an exhaust, turbos, air intakes. If it makes noise or alters the carbon emissions it's essentially illegal until you prove it's not. Meaning it doesn't exceed noise limits or have worse carbon emissions. I'd say for hoses if you replace them same same it doesn't matter what material they are or what brand you use. Same for nuts and bolts usually, they won't go and specifically check that your water hoses and some bolts are 100% OEM parts, that is nonsense.
×
×
  • Create New...