Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All, 

 

I have searched various forums in hope of finding an answer. What I want to know is where should boost gauge pipe be connected to, before throttle body or after.

What I have seen and what seems to be majority view is before throttle body .

 

little background:

I have two boost gauges, one is evo ( see below) and one is the greddy boost controller

http://prosportgauges.com/evo-electrical-boost-gauge.aspx

 

there is a pipe after throttle boddy connected to a filter and then to a t which then goes to greddy and evo gauge.

 

Evo gauge is reading -21 or -22 psi on idle whilst greddy is -9.9

when it is building boost they seem to match with 0.2 to 0.5 psi difference . I am leaning toward beliving what is shown on greddy as it is a well known brand than evo which is after market .

 

so now for my questions, would you relocate the boost pipe to before throttle body ? i suppose before TP and after pressure when car is boosted should be the same, in another word the boost should no decrease when it is passing TP .

 

2. I seem to have a boost leak and have checked all pipes without an issue. What I suspect is, it is my blitz bov as it could be opening sooner than I could reach 10 psi( what I have set the greddy as). what is your view?

I am thinking of getting a new spring for the blitz bov

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/475946-boost-gauge-pipe/
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, drifter17a said:

What I have seen and what seems to be majority view is before throttle body .

 

Not possible.  There are many dumb people in the world, but not enough for that silliness to become the majority position.

The only related thing that is true is that the boost source for running a boost controller must be before the TB.

9 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

 

Not possible.  There are many dumb people in the world, but not enough for that silliness to become the majority position.

The only related thing that is true is that the boost source for running a boost controller must be before the TB.

I suppose you are refering to solonoid connection which connects to boost and your wastegate which is before tb

 

i only said what i had seen on forums and searches

 

re my negative psi, i have tripple checked every thing and all is in order. The fact that they match ( greddy and prosport) when boost runs through it says the prosport should work fine

 

i think -14.7 is ok, don’t ask me why but i recall a memory re 14.7 being the normal air pressure or something alike. Please excuse my ignorance but at -21 or -25 at times, it seems very odd

 

it could be greddy does not show a a bigger negative value as it is limited to -10 to 30-40 psi or whatever set by greddy

Yes, this is one place where the stupid are in charge.  Everybody in the automotive world uses inches of mercury or inches (or mm) of water to measure vacuum, regardless of how stupid it is to use the column height of a liquid to describe a pressure term.  Ask the Martians what pressure (in Pascals) corresponds to -300 mmH2O and they will give you a completely different answer to the people who live on Jupiter.

  • Like 1

how would you know if BOV is leaking ?

 

mine is blitz and BOV off to air. I understand the suggestion of using the manufacture / the divertor but I do like the sound.

 

What I have read and understand from blitz is to turn the car on, adjust the screw and when it starts to idle rough or cylinder on BOV is open then tighten 1 turn . I have followed this but strongly belive my BOV is leaking .

 

I don't have air compressor at the moment to test so looking to get something and use my car tyre set to 20 psi and test for leak. in meantime I wanted to know, how can I know what spring I should use on BOV ? does it have to match with your desired boost ?

 

I understand the way BOV works is, it has two ports, one connected to after the Throttle body and one to the pipe before TB.

 

Pressure/Boost pushes the piston up and at the same time pressure from manifold/boost pushes it down from top so there is no way it could be opened during boost and when throttle is released the vacuum does create a suction from above and extra air pressure from when the TB is closed pushes the piston up so it is released. is this correct ? if so then what is the use of spring ?

 

I have noticed the BOV opened when I rev to 2-3 k which hardly creates 2-3 psi of boost even if I tight the adjustment all the way !

15 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

No, it is not at all possible to go below - 14.7 psi, the evo gauge is displaying inches per mercury for vacuum as negative psi isn't a proper way of measuring vacuum.

you are right, called prosport and was told what you said

 

you are a genuine and very confusing when you have a gauge that says negative pressure and shows PSI but it is inch Mercury and on positive it is PSI!

 

 

Have anyone used prosport, are they reliable at all ?

I have multiple Prosport gauges in my car.  The white LEDs are all failing, half of the red LEDs are failing.  The green ones are OK.  It's just as well that I want them green.

The gauges have been working fine for years.  I do have one problem with the exhaust pyrometer.  It does weird things that I'm not going to bother to explain.  I would replace it with another of the same if I could be bothered doing anything at all about it.

 
Not possible.  There are many dumb people in the world, but not enough for that silliness to become the majority position.
The only related thing that is true is that the boost source for running a boost controller must be before the TB.

Why MUST it be before the throttle body?

Imagine that you're operating the engine at part throttle.  Enough to make, say, 50% of your target boost (as measured inside the plenum, where you would expect to measure it).  There will be a sizable pressure drop across the throttle body - that's what the throttle is for.

Now, case 1.  Things set up the way that they are supposed to be.  Boost gauge in plenum, boost source for boost control actuation after the turbo but before the TB.  The boost controller will receive a larger boost signal because there is more pressure upstream the TB.  This effectively means that you will need to bleed more of it away in order to reach your target boost, but this is better than....

Case 2.  The boost controller's boost source is downstream the TB.  Now it is only seeing exactly the same boost value as the gauge.  And, as stated in the 1st paragraph, we're only seeing 50% of the boost target.  It is possible, under these conditions for the turbo to be working far too hard and overboosting in the pipe from turbo to TB because the wastegate should be shut because the boost signal to the controller is only ~50% of target.  In this situation, you end up needing much smaller throttle openings to make the same part throttle power, because of the high pressure in the inlet tract.  But, if you had an EFR or other speed sensitive turbo, it could spell insta-death.

If the throttle is wide open, it makes no difference.  But there is a lot of part throttle operation in most turbo cars, and no-one ever seems too think about that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...