Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Can't wait to see how a 35 hotside fairs up against a 30 hotside.

What size rear housing is that @hypergear? I've got a 1.01 twin scroll on mine.

Took it out for a squirt this morning and it was running a bit leaner, had to fix up the map. Then started to feed in boost and then it started to misfire lol...

Went home and looked at my logs, nothing out of the ordinary then it occurred to me, I've gone R35 coils lol.. running the stock OEM dwell would definitely be the issue, so pumped in more dwell.

Will be taking the car out tomorrow and seeing how it behaves, fuel is also 6 months old lol.. 

5 hours ago, hypergear said:

Just a quick note, the ATR45SAT you had was a 5 years old unit, current model is different, result has been updated to dyno section. More developments are underway.

And result to share:

GTX3076R Gen 2 maxed on a built Rb25det Neo on 26psi of boost, externally gated on E85 fuel.

 

59709273_1791193424315303_3772521770397990912_n (1).jpg

I'm curious, why the drop in rpm and hence power/torque on the graphs? 

It's like you back off after starting the run and then hit it again yet your torque/power never gets back up there.

It's a solid drop in 25kw from what I can make out when it does it.

28 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

I'm curious, why the drop in rpm and hence power/torque on the graphs? 

It's like you back off after starting the run and then hit it again yet your torque/power never gets back up there.

It's a solid drop in 25kw from what I can make out when it does it.

That's the dyno having trouble keeping the ramp under control , happens when turbos come on really abruptly.

  • Like 1
Just now, Ben C34 said:

That's the dyno having trouble keeping the ramp under control , happens when turbos come on really abruptly.

Is the rpm reading coming from a calculation on the roller speed or a sensor off the engine? 

The only time I've encountered an issue with ramp rate and having issues was actually that the dyno couldn't keep up with the tyres, at that point power just dropped as the tyres were wheel spinning on the dyno. 

When this happened neither the retarder or the engine rpm dropped like the graph is showing happened. I understand it giving the jittery issue above that, but not a drop in rpm. 

17 minutes ago, MBS206 said:

Is the rpm reading coming from a calculation on the roller speed or a sensor off the engine? 

The only time I've encountered an issue with ramp rate and having issues was actually that the dyno couldn't keep up with the tyres, at that point power just dropped as the tyres were wheel spinning on the dyno. 

When this happened neither the retarder or the engine rpm dropped like the graph is showing happened. I understand it giving the jittery issue above that, but not a drop in rpm. 

This is a hub dyno, so no wheelspin. That's probably why I have only seen it on other dynapack graphs.

Thats in .82 rear housing. Power curve is in response to boost curve, unfortunately I don't have a boost reading.

I've dynoed way more powerful cars on that particular dyno there's not issues with it. The only time I had similar power outline was a boost spike. Might be a delay in ext gate response, boost spiked around 4000RPM, then dropped back to norm. Could be waste gate springs are too hard, gate is jammed, hoses connecting to the external gate is too long or parameters in the EBC not 100%. 

Edited by hypergear
14 hours ago, MBS206 said:

If it's a hub dyno, are you saying the dyno is forcefully slowing the rpm of the engine after a power spike? 

No, it would be the boost spike causing power to rise very rapidly then the response of the controller actually pulls more boost out of it than it needed to and the output drops below where it was and takes a moment to get back - and in that moment the dyno pull has proceeded up the rpms a bit more and you get hole in the curve. It's all about the PID tuning.

1 hour ago, GTSBoy said:

No, it would be the boost spike causing power to rise very rapidly then the response of the controller actually pulls more boost out of it than it needed to and the output drops below where it was and takes a moment to get back - and in that moment the dyno pull has proceeded up the rpms a bit more and you get hole in the curve. It's all about the PID tuning.

If that's the case, you'd get a drop in power as RPm increases. 

This has a drop in power AND rpm meaning it had to slow, right? RPM is measured, graph trace left to right is increasing, to get a loop, rpm had to go right to left, meaning it dropped.  That's what I don't understand. 

17 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

That's the dyno having trouble keeping the ramp under control , happens when turbos come on really abruptly.

Not entirely.  There may be a SLIGHT bit of dyno control issue there but it will mainly be because there was a boost spike and drop from what I can tell looking at it - boost control isn't brilliant and I suspect the dyno would have been trying to ramp up resistance to oppose the rapid increase in torque as the torque was spooling, but then suddenly the boost dropped while the dyno was "anticipating" further torque increase so it may have dragged the rpm down for a split second before it adjusted it's resistance and that would cover the slight loop

1 minute ago, Lithium said:

Not entirely.  There may be a SLIGHT bit of dyno control issue there but it will mainly be because there was a boost spike and drop from what I can tell looking at it - boost control isn't brilliant and I suspect the dyno would have been trying to ramp up resistance to oppose the rapid increase in torque as the torque was spooling, but then suddenly the boost dropped while the dyno was "anticipating" further torque increase so it may have dragged the rpm down for a split second before it adjusted it's resistance and that would cover the slight loop

That explains it more for me. 

Thanks

Don't really like using the Haltech log viewer because you can only see 4 channels at time, a bit shit house - but the playback function is quiet nice.

7 month old E85, tune a little rich lol (just dumped in extra 10%, seems like the new setup wants more fuel).

Because it's double demerits, these runs were done in 2nd, ignore the road speed - it's wrong, I need to configure the ratios.

1 bar ~4000rpm

image.thumb.png.6c553ad9ecd2e555268ad51a9a3fca6a.png

 

1.3 bar ~4300rpm

image.thumb.png.975c0044d6f0b4eb1c0b8dfe0ab3dd6e.png

Maybe after my trip in July, need to still tidy up a few things and see if I can get a 100mm Plazmaman cooler in there first. I suspect the 76mm eBay junk cooler isn't going to do justice.

Also it's developed a misfire when you put in more boost, I wonder if it's fuel related (7 month old E85, car was off the road since November).

Twin scroll is lyfe ?

I suspect loading up the car in 3rd would show more impressive data, however for 2nd gear pulls you can see why I'm impressed for what it is, especially on a pleb 2.5L stock displacement build with Tomei "Poocams" as some call it.

The reasoning behind the "Poocams" is the actual amount of lift for drop in cams. 260/9.15mm is more than anything out on the market that are drop in and support VCT.

Broscience sometimes works lol

37 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I suspect loading up the car in 3rd would show more impressive data, however for 2nd gear pulls you can see why I'm impressed for what it is, especially on a pleb 2.5L stock displacement build with Tomei "Poocams" as some call it.

The reasoning behind the "Poocams" is the actual amount of lift for drop in cams. 260/9.15mm is more than anything out on the market that are drop in and support VCT.

Broscience sometimes works lol

Yeah.  3rd gear absolutely would show much better than that, would fully expect it to anyway.  

In regards to RB25 cams which support VCT: https://www.kelfordcams.com/nz/camshafts/nissan/rb25-nvcs/246-a-camshaft-set.html

There are a few guys around here using various spec RB25/VCT Kelford cams and they've been pretty impressive, too.

Edited by Lithium

Oooo those might be new! When I looked at Kelford at the time, they didn't have VCT cams with decent lift.

After I get a new plenum and cooler, the cams might be something I revisit.

Don't think you'd be at a power level where a 76mm plazmaman would be overwhelmed, didn't have any IAT issues with mine doing 700 to the hubs last month. Might make packaging and purchase price a bit nicer

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, that was one of the things we learned fast in the past with our MX5. When you drive with the top down, you are effectively standing out in the sun, 100% of the time, and not getting in any shade (because roads aren't shaded generally!). Just like standing out in the middle of a field on a sunny 27C day is a bit of a bad plan, so is sitting in a MX5 without sun protection.
    • I also just ordered some Frankenstein bolts and side mounts to fit a hard top Just in case I do find one, basically so it doesn't need to be fixed to the car with only the front latch.......and then gaffa tape to keep it in place for the RTN journey from wherever I get it
    • If your temps are fine now, you probably won't have any issues with where your vents are as they don't look right up at the windscreens high pressure area, so any differences when giving it the beans for extended happy laps would be minimal, but, they should vent heaps when stuck in traffic  Much like how that reverse cowl on my SS let "visible" heat out when stationary, but, because it was basically at the windscreen my coolant temps on the Hwy actually raised because air was being fed into it at speed (110kph), to only come back down to around 90° when I got off the Hwy And your 100% correct about the NC currently not needing vents, but, if I was to add a turbo, and a oil cooler and intercooler in front of the condenserand radiator, and then take it to the track???? It is apparently a recommend requirement if I don't want to worry about coolant or oil temp issues, but, any of the above are possible scenarios, over time As it sits now, with the triple pass radiator and stock air conditioning system, I have absolutely no issues with either temps or air conditioning efficiency, I've been basically daily driving thie car for the last month, both on the Hwy, and peak hour, bumper to bumper traffic, but, that's pretty much expected from basically a standard engine  Talking about no issues daily driving, it was 39° the other day and I was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on the M5 and then M7, with the top down, and with the air conditioning blowing nice cold air on my feet, balls, and face, well, there was one issue, my head and arms got pretty sun burnt Note to self: leave a hat and sunscreen in the car for such days 🤣
    • I would agree, unless you need something specific to the HV motor/battery side repaired or investigated, any mechanic will be able to perform normal services, but if you prefer, maybe look for a mechanic who regularly services/repairs Nissans, the VQ engines are pretty common in the Nissan lineup.  Sorry, I can't make any suggestions, I don't live in Vic.
    • Some of them keep working fine. 9 out of 10 of them end up causing an absolute misery bleeding the system and get thrown on the workshop floor in a tantrum and never thought about again because they were never really needed and just added crap to the car that we could have done without. Same-same with HICAS, A-LSD, and various other stupidities that over eager 10x engineers thought we had to have.
×
×
  • Create New...