Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Slap said:

Base case trimming 15-17
Ecu adds about 10 -13
Depending on fuel used as the ignition will add as much advance as it can at idle going back and forth adding and subtracting timming and fuel in accordance to air fuel ratios and knock voltage.

Maybe I'm wrong ... time to dig.

ECU doesn't add timing based on fuel used, unless you've got a full flex setup and there's ignition compensation strategy applied based on ethanol content.

 

ECU doesn't add timing based on fuel used, unless you've got a full flex setup and there's ignition compensation strategy applied based on ethanol content.   

 

The the narrow band o2 will feed the ecu the parrameters it sees and the ecu will use the maf and knock inputs too. To determine if it needs a fuel trim or timming trim.I know a bit about safc and if what you say is true it wouldn't lower the idle no matter what ...only advance timing on a skyline. But it does as it reduces airflow and it will concurrently raise timming as that is what a skyline ecu does with less airflow. 

The ecu has enough self learn features to fix small errors outside of the load map.

 

Nearly all fuel has ethanol now.

Especially higher octane fuels.

 

 

 

 

 

Whoever is reading this thread, please ignore what [mention=150098]Slap[/mention] is saying.
Nothing worse than cracking some ring lands or destroying your motor due to knock.
Do not advance your motor by 15 degrees on top of the base timing. You'll end up poorer and in tears.
[emoji35][emoji2959]

Slap, it is time for you to stop now.  So many things that you have said are simply not in agreement with reality.

1. The ECU does not pay any attention to anything to do with the fuel when it comes to setting the timing at idle.  The only thing the ECU does is

a) try to operate the engine on IACV control to hit the target idle speed with the timing fixed to 15°BTDC.  Absolute, 15°, BTDC.

b) if it can't hit the idle speed target (if the idle is too high) it will use what is called delta control to use the timing to pull the idle back.  I have personally seen this happen on many RBs when the idle control is all gummed up and won't work.

 

2.  Nissan ECUs really do NOT run a sophisticated closed loop timing control such as you outlined.  There are many more modern ECUs that do exactly that (the Ford EEC-IV was one of the first).  But R32-4 ECUs really don't.  They have a single ignition timing target value for each and every cell in the map and that is what the ECU is programmed to hit.  The only time the ECU pulls timing is when it registers knock.  There are various strategies across the ECUs, from knock maps to simple -3° type deltas, but nothing sophisticated.  If you put better fuel into one of these cars, the ECU does not go winding the timing up looking for knock and then trim it back and then add some more.  The shitty old knock sensors on these things do not lend themselves to such sophistication.

 

3. Don't talk about SAFCs as if they are relevant to this discussion.  SAFCs are to ECUs what shovels are to scalpels.

 

45 minutes ago, Slap said:

But it does as it reduces airflow and it will concurrently raise timming as that is what a skyline ecu does with less airflow. 

I quoted this bit because it is important.  It is simply NOT TRUE that R3x ECUs raise timing with less airflow.  Certainly not true across the whole map.  Have you ever looked at a stock RB2x timing map?  The timing drops to lowest values at peak torque (basically the middle of the map in both speed and load axes) then rises again as you go above and below that part of the map.  More revs = more advance.  Less load that peak torque/efficiency = more advance.  More load than peak torque/efficiency also = more advance.

 

And, for one last time.  The timing values in the maps and as output on the Consult interface for "current ignition timing" are all absolute engine position with respect to TDC.  Not "imaginary 15° base setting + the value you see".  Just "the value you see".  That's it.  Provided the CAS is set correctly.  It is a loooooooong time since it was fashionable to turn up the power by advancing the CAS a few degrees to increase the timing.  That was 20 years ago.

  • Like 2

I moved the cas so it was 99% where it was before, where it is in the photo is how it sits as we speak. Tiny bit more to the right (advanced?) than the middle. 

IMG_2582.thumb.JPG.2ba5b2631febdd95859933d1eb717946.JPG

now the IAC idle adjust is set so its about 700rpm.. thats the lowest I can sorta put it without the car not wanting to keep running when started. At some point in my combination of adjusting the idle and cas I had it at say 14 degrees but it was jumping all over the place and would stay still at idle, and then i believe the car wouldn't stay running.

 

How ive got it now seems okay - though now it seems like its a bit higher with about 50degrees timing when driving at certain throttle positions, as in ill be with a constant foot and it will be around that. 

Pretty damn unsure on if I should try adjust it more or just drive the 1400km with it like this.

Why on a timming light at idle are the rb jumpy then.
They move forward and backward with it.
They also monitor knock.
I have witnessed knock voltage resistance to get lower and lower and also raise at idle depending on both fuel type and timming.

Also you understand the idle valve controls airflow so really you just explained how the airflow part of the idle is controlled.

Yes they are set to a designated amount but they also add and subtract at idle.

I have had my 32 on a flex sensor for years using a stock ecu and a safc as an fcd.

The safc has to do with reducing airflow that advances timing.
Just like your idle valve it will impact on the ecu.

In an earlier post i should have corrected
Myself as I ment rb experience not rb25 experience but my phone is great for doin that to me and I cbf.

I would love to see a fact sheet can any one source one.
I'm not going to all of a sudden stop and believe you.

Ecu can advance timming.
Less air flow at specified load advances... this being idle atm. .
15 at the crank.
Knock voltage resistance targets as low as possible. Mine would use steps in .1v (2.4/2.1)
If it detected no knock it lowers the resistance to detect it and takes steps accordingly.

Why do people nistune if they were not sophisticated enough.

49 minutes ago, Slap said:

Knock voltage resistance targets as low as possible. Mine would use steps in .1v (2.4/2.1)
If it detected no knock it lowers the resistance to detect it and takes steps accordingly.

Wtf?

41 minutes ago, Slap said:

Less air flow at specified load advances... this being idle atm. .
15 at the crank.
Knock voltage resistance targets as low as possible. Mine would use steps in .1v (2.4/2.1)
If it detected no knock it lowers the resistance to detect it and takes steps accordingly.

Why do people nistune if they were not sophisticated enough.

Let's attack just these bits.

The ECU only adjusts timing to achieve idle speed control if it cannot achieve it with the IACV.  Period.  It does not just add and subtract timing at idle when the AFM signal goes up and down.  It doesn't even bloody look at the AFM signal when it is on the idle maps.

You see all sorts of shitty timing variation on a timing light on an RB because the belt drive to the CAS is a source of dither and because the trigger wire (on the old igniters) is a shitty way to trigger a timing light.  If you put #1 coil on a plug lead and put the trigger on that you get a much better signal, but it is still full of crap from the CAS variation, etc.

The knock sensor is a piezoelectric transducer.  Basically a microphone.  It sends the noise it receives to the ECU when it is analysed by a dedicated part of the ECU (basically an audio notch filter to grab the right frequency range and a counter for knock events, which are basically click-noises).  There is no variable resistance involved in this.  The knock sensor has an impedance of about 500kohm (or somesuch value) and the only reason to know that is to replace it with a resistor if your sensor is f**ked and you need to stop it pulling timing without chucking a code from removing it entirely.

People do use Nistune because the stock ECU is a good thing.  BUT WHAT I AM TELLING YOU IS THAT IT IS AN OLD ECU DESIGN THAT IS NOT SOPHISTICATED ENOUGH TO DO CLOSED LOOP TIMING SEEK.

I use Nistune.  I have tuned mine myself.  I have worked a few times with Matt from Nistune to fix problems in the system.  And Dosepipe tunes many Nistunes.  We know these ECUs.

Look we have high jacked this thread far to much.
I would love to open a discussion thread on the ecu and it's workings.
I understand you guys tell me you tune them and yes you are firm on what you witness. So am I.

I move to open a new thread on the topic ecu capabilities.
And would love not only to read peoples experiences but facts printed and backed up.

ORIGINALY I SHOULD HAVE ONLY POSTED
'just try retarding the cas a lil'

I'm not trying to make you all believe me or get missinformation out there. I'm sharing my experience and was trying to help a skidder out.
You guys want me to believe so let's roll onto the new thread.

3 hours ago, Slap said:

Why on a timming light at idle are the rb jumpy then.
They move forward and backward with it.

For idle stabilisation, unplug your TPS and your timing stops moving On a factory ECU.

There is a reason that the stock ecu runs low ignition timing when it is trying to actively control idle speed, eg 5-10 deg, and jumping around. It runs low idle timing, combined with an elevated IAC opening, because if it needs to quickly increase torque ie idle rpm, it is very fast for it to increase ignition timing, ie it can react fast to a situation where it needs more torque, eg saving from a stall. Andy Whittle has a youtube vid of this strategy.

So yes this low ignition timing is what the stock neo ecu targets at idle, and yes it does jump around. Ignition timing changes make the engine react faster than opening IAC etc.

To adjust timing, you disable this idle control strategy, one way is to unplug TPS. This locks the ecu to command 15 deg, and a fixed IAC level. Then you adjust CAS with a timing light to 15 deg, AND the idle speed screw to 650rpm. Then you plug TPS back in and live happily ever after.

  • Like 1

So by reseting the idle timing to 15° as far as the ecu sees...
Does this mean the ecu ads 0 ° advance now?

What is the max advance it can go?

Whats the max it can retard?

Where should it be ~ at idle?

What should i see on the light at the crank marks?

Thanks

Well, it doesn’t so much add 0, really it is commanding 15 when locked, which should match to your timing light reading.

I would have to turn on my laptop and look at the idle map to give you the range it operates through at idle, i’d guess 3 to about 18 as the ecu sees fit to control the idle speed.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...