Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R32 gtr N1/nismo skirt end pieces

look to be genuine when compared to others

is a thin light coloured plastic 

passenger side is in good condition with minor crack around the mounting hole

driver side has been repaired poorly, I have removed the filler and intended to repair and fit to my car but don’t really have the time

still very repairable

$450 ono

can post Australia wide

 

A57E0C81-9BA8-4566-88B3-893EEFF39F5A.jpeg

DEBDD064-8C42-4550-91B1-DDFAB3A1B87F.jpeg

34D35E66-9FA2-4920-8052-7E2049BA026E.jpeg

49494319-515B-4C7B-BA6F-60053848D23F.jpeg

74FB23A5-9CE9-4283-AFE3-6D18C4084060.jpeg

E78B6A9F-F536-4BF7-88FB-FAD1207D2615.jpeg

2E1B9FF7-5C4F-485A-9834-1E3531BD223D.jpeg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/476541-r32-gtr-n1nismo-side-skirts/
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Bump.

repaired the shit one, it’s in high fill now, ready to rub and paint. 

$300 for the pair

also have other parts

x2 abs pumps $100 each

front adjustable castor arms $50

r32 floor carpet, needs a mad steam clean, some cuts near the standard holes but can’t be seen when interiors in $50

used walbro 254lph pump $50

random red coloured series 1 coils with a nice, fresh, tender loom $100

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

big bump

spats $200

ABS pumps $50 each

front knuckles with hubs and uprights $100 pair

viscous fan hub $50

coupe boot carpet- ok condition $50

complete floor carpet- covered in rat shit $free (i am not f**king cleaning that, f**k that)

driver side boot channel/window rust repair section $200 - good luck finding someone thatll cut a good shell up for that

give me an offer on this stuff, theres more, boxes of factory AC stuff etc

taking up room in the garage and in my shop

text me on 0411421097

 

 

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...