Jump to content
SAU Community

How to delete MAF?


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Currently my R33 is running a blow thru z32 airflow meter in the cooler piping. Unfortunately this has damaged the sensor even though it is in a alloy housing. 

My car is running a PowerFC. Are my only options a link g4+ or Haltech Elite? Running these options are going to cost at least $3k with sensors/tuning. 

Turbo has a 4" inlet and tuner said is not possible to tune correctly due to the resolution or something along those lines. 

This is my second sensor and its getting to be a bit of a joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

Replace with R35 blade style AFM and build a cal curve for it in the PFC. It's doable, it's been done before.

Do you put the r35 one in the cooler piping or before the turbo? My tuner said due to turbocharger having 4" inlet on the intake housing it won't work due to resolution. Does this sound right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can work in a 4" inlet, but you do lose resolution (you gain massive range on the flipside). But it can be troublesome to tune.

It is best put in the cooler pipe, after the cooler. Hot side is no good. Too hot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

It can work in a 4" inlet, but you do lose resolution (you gain massive range on the flipside). But it can be troublesome to tune.

It is best put in the cooler pipe, after the cooler. Hot side is no good. Too hot.

R35 gtr sensor isn't designed to be used in cooler piping though? Is there any other options to delete MAF without spending big $ on a car worth 10k?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

What makes you say that it's not designed to work in the cooler pipe? They work perfectly well there. They are massively robust (physically) compared to the old style ones (like Z32 etc).

Because in the r35 gtr they are used in the turbo inlet so are not under pressure from boost. 

Am I able to delete the MAF using a Haltech Platinum Pro or Link G4+? What'd be the cheapest ecu to get rid of it with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one, would never have considered putting a Z32 into the cooler piping. I wouldn't hesitate to do it to do it with a blade style AFM.

You can delete the AFM with any half decent aftermarket ECU and a MAP sensor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/29/2019 at 6:13 AM, GTSBoy said:

I for one, would never have considered putting a Z32 into the cooler piping. I wouldn't hesitate to do it to do it with a blade style AFM.

You can delete the AFM with any half decent aftermarket ECU and a MAP sensor.

What do you know is the cheapest ecu that can delete the maf sensor which works well with rb25?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[emoji6][emoji16][emoji106]

 

Please view this ad:

 

Rb wolf ecu,

https://www.gumtree.com.au/s-ad/traralgon/engine-engine-parts-transmission/rb-wolf-ecu/1219707349?utm_source=com.google.android.apps.docs&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialbuttons&utm_content=app_android

 

 

 

Download the application from the Google Play Store.

https://tinyurl.com/n4b7djy

 

Best to get a new expensive tech and make it a 13k car instead though.

 

Also you can use both i believe on a crossover so at a certain load level or pressure level the map takes over from the maf alowing maf to be res king at low throttle and map to res load like a champ.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Blakeo said:

What do you know is the cheapest ecu that can delete the maf sensor which works well with rb25?

A Link ecu nowadays is over $2k

An R35 MAF is about $300

https://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/car-parts-accessories/performance/electronics/listing-2165296325.htm?rsqid=df64a402735949a298abc4973537ce38-001

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The two diagrams are equivalent. The R32 one is just one sheet out of about 3 showing everything in the whole car all at once. And without knowing the functionality that occurs in the modules, they are both equally opaque.
    • 8v - 2.48ms 9v - 2.15ms 10v - 1.74ms 11v - 1.41ms 12v - 1.15ms 13v - 0.99ms 14v - 0.89ms 15v - 0.82ms 16v - 0.81ms I'm running these values on my RB20 Neo with 570cc Denso R35 stock jets and it's great. Also bought a set for my Legnum VR4, love these injectors!
    • Thanks for your reply,  Those blue/green wires running to the actuator aren't attached to anything, so I'm not sure how the central locking is still working. I will have to take a good look tomorrow, I don't have the car with me. After googling it seems like a pretty common aftermarket actuator which even uses the same green/blue wires the immobiliser required. i'll test everything tomorrow and if it's working i'll melt the solder, strip it, resolder and neaten it all up with some heat shrink. I don't have to understand it if it works hahaha I just don't want a fire/ short circuit. That R32 diagram looks more like a continuity chart? Can you make sense of this form the R34 manual? 10V is probably due to very flat battery, i'll recheck as well tomorrow, I did have to jump start it haha. Thanks again!  
    • So, COM doesn't mean comms. It means common. What common itself means will depend on the type of device. For a two directional actuator (ie, one that can push and pull on the same output rod) then the common will typically just be the earth connection. There will be at least 2 other wires. If you put 12V on one of the other wires, then the actuator will push. On the other 12V wire, it will pull. Can't quite make out what is going on with the wiring of your actuator. It appears to have several wires at the actuator plug, but there only appears to be 2 wires where its loom approaches the door control module, with at least one of the others cut off. I don't know these actuators off by heart. I'd have to look at a wiring diagram for one before knowing what the wires were about, and that's despite me having to replace one in my car not all that long ago. Just not interesting enough to have dedicated memory set aside for trivia like that any more. That actuator is an aftermarket one, not the original one, which probably died and was replaced. That might require some sort of bodge job on wiring to make it work. Although nothing should justify the bodginess of the bodge job done. As to the soldering job on the door module's loom plug. Ahhahhahaha. Yes, very nasty. Again, I cant tell you what any of those wires do. You'd need to study the R34 wiring diagram (if you can find one that shows the door module). I don't think I have any. I'd have to study the R32 diagram to start to understand what mine is doing, and again, even though I've had a problem with mine for the last 25 years (where it locks the passenger door when the driver's window reaches top or bottom of travel) I'm just not interested enough to try to to work it out. So long as it's not burning down, it's fine with me. Here's the R32 GTR diagram, which, confusingly, has rear door lock actuators and window motors on it!! As you can see, unless you understand the functions of the door lock timer and the power window amplifier, you'll never be able to work out how it works just from the diagram. I don't imagine that the R34 one is any better. Hopefully an R34 aware bod can help. FWIW, the two wires that are cut and joined look like they are both power supply - so hopefully it is not fatal to join them. The 10V you measured on the cut off free end of one of them is concerning. You'd expect 12V, and it might be the reason for the bodge job joining them together.
×
×
  • Create New...