Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So I recently bought a completely "stock" gtr R32 and the guy I bought it from said it had $25k put into it but has supposedly has over 500hp with stock m24 turbos so I was wondering what internally would $15k get you to be at the point in hp? If anyone knows I would be grateful to know because crankshaft and pistons along with turbos are all stock

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/
Share on other sites

500HP sounds unreasonable. Dyno it and find out what the truth is. Then start thinking. We could tell you all sorts of fairy stories about how much power it could can and can't have on stock turbos. The M24 doesn't mean a lot - it's just the compressor cover casting number. The internals could be different to stock.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909974
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

500HP sounds unreasonable. Dyno it and find out what the truth is. Then start thinking. We could tell you all sorts of fairy stories about how much power it could can and can't have on stock turbos. The M24 doesn't mean a lot - it's just the compressor cover casting number. The internals could be different to stock

The guy told me when money was put into it the motor was rebuilt along with the turbos he said the turbos are off rn and once the engine gets to 500 miles in the motor which is at 153 miles right now so if I dynod it I don't think it would make 500 n/a but he also said when motor is at 500 miles the turbos get tuned to be turned on I guess and it'll push somewhere from 500-700 hp

 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909980
Share on other sites

Oh Boy!

I'm starting to have a bad feeling about this. When you say "the turbos are off right now", do you mean off the engine, not installed? Because if so, there is no reason, no reason at all, to try to run the engine without the turbos. I have absolutely no idea how you would go about trying to do so. You need to somehow connect exhaust manifolds to an exhaust system that normally relies on turbos to make the connection, and you have to somehow get the induction system to connect from the front of the plenum to the air flow meters. This is all big fabrication work for a completely unnecessary and bullshit "requirement" to run the engine in without turbos. No-one else in the rest of the world would do this.

If you mean simply that they are fitted but somehow "disabled", then that's not really possible either unless the wastegates are wired open. The only logical thing is that they might be set to low boost and the boost controller could be turned up later.

Have you paid money? Can you get it back?

You will NEVER make >500HP off stock turbos, let alone 700. It's a GTR, not a Dodge Demon. They were good for ~400HP. Maybe a bit more. Have a read around the threads in the forum. Here's one. It's the second post in the conveniently named sticky thread at the top of the FI forum about Rb26 power outputs from different turbos. Stock turbos making <450HP (at the engine) in 2005. At max (sensible) boost of 14 psi. https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/93880-rb26-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/?do=findComment&comment=1700397

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909982
Share on other sites

No as in what you were saying the turbos are set to 0psi(I should've specified that sorry) turbos spool but nothing greater than 0psi yes eachone after 500miles will be tuned to spool 12psi on each one but I don't think they'll push the car to 500-700 hp but my father to whom is a mechanic thinks it doesn't because he called the company that "built" the motor but me who is a jdm fanatic and worked on jz's and fa20's and Winkle rotors I know that out of the stock input/output won't create that much power but he likes to argue lmao. Just wanted to clarify it with others who know about RB's

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909983
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, brzerkr said:

are set to 0psi

Difficult to achieve. Also pointless and unnecessary.

Most of us just drive gently for the first few miles (AND with standard break in practice of not just pussyfutting it around but making sure to give it a widely varying range of loads and revs), then lean on it hard. Many rebuilt engines are broken in on the dyno. They bed the rings in then start tuning and by the time all the power runs are finished it's had the hardest usage before the customer even gets in it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7909985
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

Oh man. So you bought a car that has had a rebuild and not proven yet?

This can end bad

It'll be fineeeee. What's the worse than can happen Ben?

Honestly OP,  the whole thing sounds suss. To answer your original question to make 500hp on a rb26 is fairly easily and you don't really need to rebuild the engine if its in good condition to start with. 

For 500hp, you would need to hi-flow the twin turbos, potentially upgrade the injectors and nistune the ecu. 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7910029
Share on other sites

As a general rule cars are only sold shortly after a rebuild if it has gone wrong in some way. It's often possible the rebuild may not have been done at all, just a claimed rebuild to try and sell the car. You should be extremely suspicious if someone claims a recent rebuild and get a full PPI done, possibly even an oil analysis and cut open the oil filter.

A lot of machine shops and engine builders just don't take enough care when doing rebuilds to achieve factory quality. If they can't produce receipts or invoices proving that it was rebuilt by someone who knows what they're doing, you should walk away.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477641-new-to-rbs/#findComment-7910062
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...