Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I'm a bit lost on this one.

 Installed a Deatchworks DW300 a few years ago and rewired with cable as suggested by Deatchworks. 

Since then the cable has burnt out (melted) twice telling me that there is some resistance there.

To avoid a fire I decided to upgrade the wire size again complete from battery to fuse to relay to the pump including the earth.

Since then the power curve is inconsistent and at anywhere near WOT the engine cuts out and dumps a plume of smoke. When cold the AFR is richer than normal. When hot/engine has been running for a long time there is massive power loss and running extremely lean (AFR16-20) even when gently accelerating from a standstill. 

Any thoughts on weather it just needs a retune, or cable size too big or buggered fuel pump or fuel getting too hot or another biggeted sensor or perhaps something else?

Since its started playing up this time I have replaced the narrowband OEM O2 sensor, MAF sensor and visually checked for intake leaks, however I am certain it is directly related to the fuel pump rewire.

Any input greatly appreciated. 

Fuel system related mods are:

- Deatchworks DW300

- Siemens 660cc injectors 

- Greddy emanage ultimate 

Its being monitored by a Greddy Infometer touch an Innovate LC-2 wideband

I'll try to get my hands on a fuel pressure guage and monitor it. 

The confusing part for me is that when cold it runs very rich and when hot it starts to lean out.The symptoms get worse the longer the car runs. I just let it idle for 20 mins then tried to drive, fuel ratio jumped to 20 with very light acceleration then stayed idling at 18 at which point I left the car on the side of the road and walked home. 

The wiring route is exactly the same as previous rewire route which was working perfectly fine apart from melting the fuse and cables at each end. It was still operating,  just getting very hot due to resistance.

Current upgraded wire size is 8AWG.

according to engineering toolbox (I'm sure there are other sources too) 8WG over 6m length can carry max 25amp at 12v.https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/amps-wire-gauge-d_730.html

According to DW, the pump draws up to 18amps so it is close but should not be close enough to cause trouble. https://www.deatschwerks.com/sites/www.deatschwerks.com/files/DATA/DW300 Tech Sheet.pdf

What is the route and distance from the battery to the pump for the +, and what size fuse is in it? And where in that run did the cable melt? And what is the route for - as well?

 

Thats interesting.

The section of cable between the battery and relay including the fuse holder melted and also a 100mm long section of the negative cable directly off the fuel pump inside the tank melted. It even melted the plug on top of the pump!

The route is about 4.5m long on a 25amp fuse with 30amp relay. The fuse and relay are situated on top of the battery. The cable then runs through the firewall with the engine harness, then on the side of the passenger footwell and under the rear seat to the pump. The new cable completely replaces the old one even inside the plugs and in the pump cradle.

Perhaps I'll try another rewire with 10awg instead.

Can't seem to find anywhere local that sells fuel pressure guage, sensor and adapter so that will take a couple of weeks to get anyway.

Wiring sounds exactly right to me. Right size cable, right size relay (larger than needed), right size fuse (smaller than cable max), right order of wiring.

I'd replace the pump next, not the wiring (unless it is damaged again), I think it is drawing way too many amps.  Before you do one possible test is to check the amps being drawn by the pump (you put the multimeter in line with the positive or negative) but check the multimeter can support up to 20amps, I think a lot are limited to 10.  

1 hour ago, Duncan said:

Wiring sounds exactly right to me. Right size cable, right size relay (larger than needed), right size fuse (smaller than cable max), right order of wiring.

I'd replace the pump next, not the wiring (unless it is damaged again), I think it is drawing way too many amps.  Before you do one possible test is to check the amps being drawn by the pump (you put the multimeter in line with the positive or negative) but check the multimeter can support up to 20amps, I think a lot are limited to 10.  

A clamp meter is the smart choice there.

So, left the car idling and took the following measurements on current draw from the pump:

When running from cold 25 amps.
Gradually drops to 22 amps at operating tempetature with AFR10.
Then after 5mins 21amps with AFR11.
Another 20 mins 18 amps with AFR11.
Another 25 mins 15 amps AFR11.
Another 15mins 14.5amps AFR13.
Another 25mins 13amps AFR14.
Another 15 mins 12.5amps AFR14. When stalled up to 2k at this point AFR18

  • Like 1

Another 15mins back to 13amps and AFR18-19 when any load put on stall.

External temperature of fuel tank 32deg, external air temperature 16deg. Not sure how to diagnose vapour lock?

Another 15mins back to 13amps and AFR18-19 when any load put on stall.
External temperature of fuel tank 32deg, external air temperature 16deg. Not sure how to diagnose vapour lock?

Take off the fuel cap
  • 1 month later...

It's been a while coming, but here's an update:

Got a new Deaschworks DW300 and installed it. On start up it was running very rough (4-5 cylinders) with AFR9. The engine stalled - too rich I suppose. At which point the starter motor packed up (have had signs it would). Solenoid contacts are worn out. After being knobbed around by the autoelectrician who has rebuilt a few of my M35 starters before, it seems the solenoids cant be replaced.

So, installed another 2nd hand starter, got it running and still rough as guts. Discovered 2 spark plugs weren't firing as their tubes were full of oil. 

Over the next few days I'll strip the rocker covers and reseal the worn rubber seals around the spark plug tubes. Hopefully this will sought out the issues its got. 

I'm getting over it. Very close to deciding to part it out.

Thanks for your help fellas

I definitely understand your frustration at this point...but the good news is that if changing the fuel pump changed the behaviour, you have found and fixed a problem.

You may be close to fixing it. If the pump was always an issue and the emanage was tuned with a faulty pump, a properly working pump will mean you need a retune. I'd run it up on a dyno with someone who can monitor and correct the AFR and you may be pleasantly surprised (well, it will still be a M35 not a C34, but there's not much to do about that without parting it out....)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Don't "upload" the pictures. Just copy the picture direct from somewhere (I usually am pasting screenshots or something else that I have on the clipboard as an image, not as a file" and just paste it direct into the post editor. Just like you were pasting it into a Word doc or something. You can't damage something if you lift it where you are supposed to. If you look carefully at the correct jacking points, you will see that they are reinforced right there. And nowhere else. That is where the "foot" of the factory jack is supposed to sit. That's why you need rubber pads with slots. 10mm might not be deep enough. Note also that the slots are not required if the pinchweld has already been slammed flat. You could just lift it at the correct spot with a flat pad, because the damage is already done. No point in making worse though, if it is recoverable. IF. Yes, that's called a chassis rail. You can lift carefully on these, if you spread the load. A decent block of wood is good. But keep in mind what I said before. Any time you start doing this sort of thing, you are off the normal path and into "be bloody careful", because it is obviously not stable. Dumb. The refinforcement is already there. See above.
    • yeah looks like they've been lifted there previously but with solid not slitted rubber blocks. I'd just bend them back (combination of vice grips or hammer with some sort of drift, then hit the area with underbody protection paint. As for the siderails, I'd call those chassis rails and that is exactly what I meant about being careful with the balance point. You can probably lift off them at the point where the 2 pieces overlap, but you need to be careful with the forward balance of the car if you do when the engine is in....sills are a better choice. I guess you could weld some reinforcement in the sill area near the jacking points but it shouldn't be necessary if you use blocks with a slit. If you do want to reinforce it I'd use square section equal or taller than the seam and then just use flat rubber blocks for lifting
    • driver side sidemember and jacking point (looks the worst by far) driver side rear jack point passenger side sidemember and jack point passenger side rear jack point   Ignore my mug on the last photo. Turns out I was just too stupid to properly use the forum's attachment feature previously
    • Fk me, I guess next time I will try to use the onsite attachments feature. I find it hard to work with so far though because I can't move the images to where I want them to be. I will try to make a separate post with just images. As for lifting. The work I need to do for now involves the exhaust and engine mainly, so the arm covering the jacking points is not a problem. But I don't want to bend in the whole sill or underfloor by lifting the car at the original jack points. I found some rubber blocks, 125 by 125 with a 10mm wide and 10mm deep cutout, which I'm hoping will work for not hitting the jacking rail. The sidemember, as seen in the service manual, are the rectangular frame rails that come from the front of the car and go alongside the gearbox and downpipe. Those that get crushed inwards if you use them for a floorjack. They are already slightly bent in from being used to hoist by other people. I think cutting off the jacking points and welding or bolting on a reinforcement plate along the sill might not be a dumb idea. Or is it dumb?     A 2 post hoist is what I'm gonna work with, but not for any underbody work, just leaky engine and exhaust work so far. Depends on what else I find that might need immediate attention. For metalwork on the sills I think I'd just bring the car to a panel beater. What's your take on getting rid of the original jacking rails and putting reinforcement plates along the sills?
    • Yeah titanium always looks cool but I don't need that, just regular pipes would be fine. But I am really struggling to find any full hardpipe kit that is still for sale.
×
×
  • Create New...