Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just a quick question, im getting about 380-410km on a full tank of fuel. and did about 200km on 32L of fuel which is quite high compared to my mates. he gets around 600km on a tank of fuel. So is my fuel needle off or is this just normal? Its an auto btw but use the semi auto (manual option) to drive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/477935-v35-fuel-economy-problem/
Share on other sites

Very common that the fuel sensor is dirty.

There are some Topics on this if you go searching

So if you find that when you fill up your tank (to the top) the fuel gauge doesn't go up and past the full line. You may need to clean the sensor.

Pull off the lower part of your back seat to get to your fuel tank pumps.

there will be one on the drivers side and passengers side. open both. pull out the pumps. get a cotton tip and clean the metal contacts.

Best to find the topic on this. there are pics ;) 

  • Thanks 1

are you basing your figures on how much fuel you are actually putting in the car?  or what the fuel gauge says?  Fuel gauges are usually not accurate enough to use for judging economy when they are working well.

Fill the car, reset the trip meter, drive for a few hundred KM then fill the tank again, you can then work out your economy based on the distance you travelled and the amount of fuel used.  My 6MT is usually in the mid 10L/100km with 100% light urban driving and mid 7s on the highway.

If you are really only getting 200km from 32L of fuel, this is quite bad, coming in at 16L/100km unless you are almost always in heavy peak hour traffic.

On 7/26/2019 at 4:45 PM, Classic_Aussie said:

Just a quick question, im getting about 380-410km on a full tank of fuel. and did about 200km on 32L of fuel which is quite high compared to my mates. he gets around 600km on a tank of fuel. So is my fuel needle off or is this just normal? Its an auto btw but use the semi auto (manual option) to drive.

I was having similar issues with my v36. Was getting about 300-325km per tank.
Annoyed me enough to do the following

 

Cleaned MAF Sensors, Replaced filters, Reset ECU

 

unsure if the ECU on the v35 is "self learning" like mine but when you reconnect it all, Drive in (D) only for about 50km (drive like a f**king grandma, slow and steady)

I did this and now i get atleast 500 to a tank. i got 700 on the highway before i filled up.

Also as fun as it might be to drive in Tiptronic, it will make your economy worse. I only use it every now and again.

22 hours ago, sonicii said:

are you basing your figures on how much fuel you are actually putting in the car?  or what the fuel gauge says?  Fuel gauges are usually not accurate enough to use for judging economy when they are working well.

Fill the car, reset the trip meter, drive for a few hundred KM then fill the tank again, you can then work out your economy based on the distance you travelled and the amount of fuel used.  My 6MT is usually in the mid 10L/100km with 100% light urban driving and mid 7s on the highway.

If you are really only getting 200km from 32L of fuel, this is quite bad, coming in at 16L/100km unless you are almost always in heavy peak hour traffic.

I did that and drove for 200km then used that info with the L filled up and got 15L per 100km. But if that’s the case would that mean i can drive past the Empty (E) o the fuel gauge since its inaccurate. ?

22 hours ago, sonicii said:

are you basing your figures on how much fuel you are actually putting in the car?  or what the fuel gauge says?  Fuel gauges are usually not accurate enough to use for judging economy when they are working well.

Fill the car, reset the trip meter, drive for a few hundred KM then fill the tank again, you can then work out your economy based on the distance you travelled and the amount of fuel used.  My 6MT is usually in the mid 10L/100km with 100% light urban driving and mid 7s on the highway.

If you are really only getting 200km from 32L of fuel, this is quite bad, coming in at 16L/100km unless you are almost always in heavy peak hour traffic.

I did that and drove for 200km then used that info with the L filled up and got 15L per 100km. But if that’s the case would that mean i can drive past the Empty (E) o the fuel gauge since its inaccurate. ?

3F939F75-2590-4197-803D-9C44C1C4FE6C.jpeg

22 hours ago, sonicii said:

are you basing your figures on how much fuel you are actually putting in the car?  or what the fuel gauge says?  Fuel gauges are usually not accurate enough to use for judging economy when they are working well.

Fill the car, reset the trip meter, drive for a few hundred KM then fill the tank again, you can then work out your economy based on the distance you travelled and the amount of fuel used.  My 6MT is usually in the mid 10L/100km with 100% light urban driving and mid 7s on the highway.

If you are really only getting 200km from 32L of fuel, this is quite bad, coming in at 16L/100km unless you are almost always in heavy peak hour traffic.

I did that and drove for 200km then used that info with the L filled up and got 15L per 100km. But if that’s the case would that mean i can drive past the Empty (E) o the fuel gauge since its inaccurate. ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
    • Yeah, well I was probably way underguessing the $300 figure anyway. Just multiplied a "normal" by 4 for the purposes of pointing out it's not cheap, particularly if it has to be repeated.
    • We have an alignment shop out here that does what you're talking about but he wants like 800 AUD a pop. DIY is "cheaper" but once you start accounting for the value of your time I'm not sure it's worth it.
    • The main catch phrase for any car is "the eye of the beholder", and "personal tastes and preferences" And as for the plastic "flares", I honestly think they look cheap and tacky, and I cannot see them aging well, maybe if they were body colour they might look better to my eyes, but, I would still prefer it the were more like the older WRX STI models that had the wider body metal panels In saying all this 5hit, I wouldn't buy a new WRX again, even if it had the wide body metal panels    
×
×
  • Create New...