Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure .. I bought it from Clint32 on these forums.

I think it has an 8cm^2 exhaust housing

I've been advised that I should perhaps be going for cams that will generate torque rather than power as I'm going to need all the low down grunt I can get

Tuning costs?... give me another week to get another RB20 into my thing and ill see how i do with the baby TD06 properly tuned... if the cams arrive before the engine gets bolted in then it will all go in at once saving me the costs for another tune...if the cars is back together begfore i get the cams then ill be able to give you a before and after.

RS500: As Roy said, tuning costs. I thought if I just get the cams to start with then I can do the valve springs etc and get that side of things out of the way. But then again I guess tuning costs = dyno time so it's probably not too expensive the second time round to get a retune.

Joel: I dont think so. It's a T67 that he had in addition to his TO4E. I'm not sure if he put the T67 on or not though.

The cam selection for using hydraulic followers are all small lift, and won't require non-standard springs.

Cams for torque... where do you want the torque to be in the rev range? If low-end, use the standard ones. If you want more torque higher in the rev range use 264's or 272's - this would complement the turbo alot better than trying to compensate for lack of low rpm boost with standard cams. Although larger duration cams would probably assist low rpm torque as well, as they aren't aimed at reduced emissions al la std jobs.

Running an aftermarket exhaust manifold (re: a good, proven one, not a hack job) will give you a big gain in off-boost torque and driveability, as well as a throaty exhaust note.

Short version - get the largest you can get your hands on. 264 or 272 would be awesome!

You would only need to change the valvesprings to accomodate either:

a) higher revs

B) higher lift cams

Really you should be designing the engine to work together as a package, that will produce peak results within a specific rev range to suit your purposes.

The turbo, cams, gearing, head flow, manifolds can all be juggled to work well for a specific target - since you've already nomiated the rev range the engine will be in (by buying that turbo) you have to make the rest of the components fall into line. Mismatched components are a comprimise, they can work well together but it's not optimal.

Having said that, I'm sure even the standard cams would work with that turbo, so anything larger is a bonus.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I would like more noise related info for my truly uneducated guess  Does it do it at idle or when revving, clutch engaged, and disengaged? Does it only do it when the car is moving? I've heard "similar" noises from a clutch pack that left the chat room, and CV joints that have chewed themselves out But as Matt said, how's the yokes, tailshaft and centre bearing going after their last little issue Fingers crossed it is something simple  Weird noises make me cringe 
    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...