Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, I would like to find out what are your opinions on the new Enkei GTC02.  Will this be a good style for R32?  Seems well priced, cheaper than equivalent sized RS05RR that I initially wanted but decided against.  

http://www.enkei.co.jp/wheels/racing/gtc02/index.php

spacer.png

spacer.png

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/478959-new-enkei-gtc02/
Share on other sites

Yeah 18x9.5 +15 will be the one.  Enkei sells aluminum 75mm to 66.1mm hub rings, so that isn't an issue.

On Enkei's promo they seem quite proud of those dimples, saying it's a lesson learned from their real racing wheels used in Super GT.

https://motor-fan.jp/article/10010782

Already got a quote back from RHDJapan, ¥36,886 each, before the 6% rim discount they would offer from time to time.  

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/478959-new-enkei-gtc02/#findComment-7917974
Share on other sites

On 17/10/2019 at 1:50 PM, GTSBoy said:

Centre bore is easily dealt with with inserts.

I also like the black - but I would prefer them without those dimples. Too fussy.

The dimples improve rigidity, something that racers would understand. He he.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/478959-new-enkei-gtc02/#findComment-7918011
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...