Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

B-man, what rail pressure are you running? this will make a difference.

EG, sard 550cc injectors are rated at 3.0kg rail pressure, at 2.55kg (stock nissan) they are only 510cc.

your formula is basically correct though.

Also, make sure you adjust injector lag time. If you are running Sard 550cc, it is around +0.08ms

how is the idle going? - I forgot to mention on your idle question thread, but have you tried lubricating the AAC vavle? I sprayed a fair bit of WD40 around the adjust screw and it certainly helped (wound in the adjust until the valve was working overtime to control idle, left it go for about a minute, then would the screw back out and it settle things a fair bit:))

  • 2 months later...

Sorry to dig up such a old thread

Where is the injector correction located on the hand controller?

I am installing some 440cc into my R32 and need to change the injector correction so its at least drivable to get it tuned?

My plan is set the PFC to default, and then add the injector correction so it will hopefully be drivable

Any info much apprieceated

Chris

Mine is at 60% Chris and I'm sure it is on standard fuel pressure coz I set the nismo fuel reg at stock pressure,that is unless when I got it tuned they wound more into it.

What I noticed with the standard tune on the PFC and gtr injectors was it ran very very rich and did'nt mind the extra fuel when cold but as soon as it got some heat into it it missed coughed and spluttered and stalled.

So as a fix so I could get it to the tuning shop I went into the ign/inj correction settings and put the inj to 0.650 and it was still rich but safe to drive.

R31 is on the money, the INJ/IGN is the one you want - just divide the stock injector capacity with the new injector capacity, the resultant 0.xx will equate to the percentage you will need.

Also, you have an "injector" menu, you need to put in the correction there too - this is for closed loop (idle, cruise) and cold start correction - you will also see a lag correction, if you have a look here: http://www.ap-engineering.co.jp/el/inj_top.htm from memory they have the lag times and injector capacities for stock (and aftermarket) injectors including the relevant fuel rail pressures. The lag correction is to make sure the injectors fire at the right time.

Most tuners I have been to dont even seem to realise it is there, but it made a big difference to idle and cruise with my 550cc.

Oh, and lastly, the IGN/INJ correction is volatile, so when you stop the car, you will have to re-enter the correction until it is tuned. Its a very handy feature for the ign side of things too - if detonation is up a bit, on a hot day, bad fuel whatever, just pull a degree or two across the map to prevent expensive problems.

Dont be scared to do the correction and drive the car - just dont thrash it :P and keep an eye on the knock.

GL

Cheers guys, looks like a work around thats not too hard

At least it should get me to the dyno etc

I just found a english PFC hand controller manual which takes you through pretty much everyhting you need to know, i will post a link when i can find it again!

Chris

I just found a english PFC hand controller manual which takes you through pretty much everyhting you need to know, i will post a link when i can find it again!

Please do!

Richard

That's good but unfortunately as it's for a 13B a lot of the stuff isn't relavent. Does anyone have one for the RB26DETT?

Richard

Apparently thats the only full english manual out, as it was done for the american market

Let me know if you find any other manuals

There are quite a few on www.apexi-usa.com

Chris

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...