Jump to content
SAU Community

Garret T04Z alternative - same loudness level but quicker spool ?

Baroque

By Baroque,
in R Series (R30, R31, R32, R33, R34)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Baroque Apprentice

Baroque

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hi fellas.

Quick and ably.

As far as the only turbo goes,not including my mods besides the fact the target is up to 650 hp. Which turbo from Garret series will be better solution (if any is) for this horsepower range,for street driving to achieve faster spool (not track use as you see,just have good fun when you drive with quicker appearing spool sound) than T04z being in the same loundess range.

I read about gt35 gtx35 and gt40,but still I should ask someone with more experience before I let my money disappear.

Any ideas??

 

Thanks in advance for replies.

Edited by Baroque
Baroque Apprentice

Baroque

Posted
  • Author
Posted

niZmo- at least t04z is more responsive than t51r in that kind of rpm range i will stick with.

Ben34- Not exactly.If my main goal was to aim the sound only,i wouldn't go 650 hp.This is not just track use car,and the project will be top notch pure perfection so every detail has to be on the best level i can reach because thats what I want.

Ben C34 Grand Master

Ben C34

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Baroque said:

niZmo- at least t04z is more responsive than t51r in that kind of rpm range i will stick with.

Ben34- Not exactly.If my main goal was to aim the sound only,i wouldn't go 650 hp.This is not just track use car,and the project will be top notch pure perfection so every detail has to be on the best level i can reach because thats what I want.

So why choose old tech turbo? Makes no sense at all. It's 2020, not1998

Kinkstaah Grand Master

Kinkstaah

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Baroque said:

and the project will be top notch pure perfection so every detail has to be on the best level i can reach because thats what I want.

But you're entirely unfamiliar with turbos out there?

You have a lot of research to do.

Kings of the Castle are the Garrett G series or Borg Warner EFR. I would err on the side of the Garrett for livability reasons. They're physically smaller for the same power. They are fairly spooly. You won't care either way given how much better performance they would provide over a T04Z.

Baroque Apprentice

Baroque

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks Kinkstaah.I have gt3582r in mind because it fits my power goals and what i have read,spools faster than the most turbos in that horsepower rate.

" So why choose old tech turbo? Makes no sense at all. It's 2020, not1998 "-  Im not just the guy who forgets good old parts.I take everything into consideration.

GTSBoy Grand Master

GTSBoy

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Baroque said:

I have gt3582r in mind because it fits my power goals and what i have read,spools faster than the most turbos in that horsepower rate.

The GT3582R is ALSO an old tech turbo. The other options you have been pointed to are mush better.

Dose Pipe Sutututu Grand Master

Dose Pipe Sutututu

Posted
Posted

Buy a modern turbo, send cover to these guys. All the noises, all the responses, all the chops amd no gay lag from dinosaur turbos or gay twin turbos.

http://TURBOMOD.PRO/

  • Like 1
Kinkstaah Grand Master

Kinkstaah

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

But do they make the noise!!!!!???

They actually do make a fair bit of noise lol, I'd say they are exactly this spooly.

Baroque Apprentice

Baroque

Posted
  • Author
Posted

GTSBoy - but from what've read,3582R is the fastest spooler of them all,and that was my question of the topic.Older has to mean shieet right of the bat ??

Dose pipe Stutu-thanks man a lot.I didnt' know about these guys at all..

GTSBoy Grand Master

GTSBoy

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Baroque said:

but from what've read,3582R is the fastest spooler of them all

On any given engine, with the turbo matched properly to provide the same maximum power, that simply cannot be true any more. The EFRs are ALL about response. The G series Garretts have smaller wheels for the same flow than any of those previous gen GTs.

The GT3582R may well be the fastest spooling of the old tech turbos, but that don't mean a thing when new tech comes along.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • Shizu
      Sheraaz's R34GTT Build

      By Shizu 路 Posted

      Omg Brake pedal removal.. FML!!
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah 路 Posted

      I mean, I can confirm the TPS is at 100%.... I can confirm when we installed the TB and setup the cable that the TB was indeed fully open at max pedal travel.. the same 'curve' (WRT MAP vs MAP) existed with the previous setup/TB/manifold as well... No, we did not do a run with no intake connected. I would love to go back in time to do such a run to rule out the intake. It would have also been good to do a run with the airbox lid off. There's a test there where increased IAT vs more available air could be a positive tradeoff. I remember taking the lid off my R34 Turbo setup back in the day and noticing a monster increase, even if IAT's did go up. Could be similar. Hard to test unless I find a very deserted road. 
    • LaurelPWR
      Forced Performance Hta Turbos

      By LaurelPWR 路 Posted

      That's actually encouraging to be honest. my motor was rebuild many years ago but it's probably done less than 30,000kms and fucc all limiter or drift, majority street / drag / roll racing. It'll be fine 馃挭馃徏 I don't even have lines or a can for the cam breathers installed yet, there is zero oil residue or splatter on or around them, it drives beautifully so it seems healthy. Just a ticky lifter, yet they're almost brand new oem genuine Nissan and haven't done many kms at all...
    • MBS206
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By MBS206 路 Posted

      Have you confirmed the throttle body goes to WOT (and stays there) during the run?
    • silviaz
      Steps to DIY sanding car back ready for respray....

      By silviaz 路 Posted

      I'm having a problem. I think it was mentioned above somewhere but can't see it.  I'm stuck in the cycle of, sand, filler, low spot again, put filler, sand, low spot again, now i put filler again and a thicker portion which seems to have helped but I got low spots in other areas. In the image. Circled in red thats where the original low spot was and the shape is the same as the red out line. I've more or less fixed that (still low spot up the top but now I have low spots where the green circled part is.  Is likely the issue that I didn't start with a course sand paper? I sanded the filler with 240 to reduce the risk of not going to far but maybe the issue is that I'm only taking off enough material to remove some of the filler but not the high spots. I now started sanding with 120 and I think I'm seeing a difference. I did fix one dent the other 2 are f**ked and seems like I made another low spot which is indicated by the furthest green circle on the left handside. Any thoughts and solutions?   Also second image. All of these rock chips, can they be filled in with primer or do i need to fill them all with filler/putty? So many rock chips on mine lol.
脳
脳
  • Create New...