Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello ladies and gents!

After any advice as to what is needed to make a 32 diff fit into a 34 gtr. I have removed my stock A-LSD and driveshafts, and have purchased a 32 diff with 32/33 non vspec shafts. I did some reading and read some accounts of spacers being required, new bolts different lengths etc.

anyone with first hand experience able it’s shed some light?

 

cheers!

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/479536-help-32gtr-diff-into-34gtr/
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, KiwiRS4T said:

Not going to work. Your front and rear diffs are 3.54:1 and the R32 diff is 4.1

Sorry forget mention I have a 4.11 front diff ready to go in, will be just disconnecting the front shaft till I swap sumps.

Ok but you do realise that there will be a significant increase in your revs at highway speeds and your six speed box will be operating over a much smaller speed range. Have you looked hard for a non A-LSD rear diff?

2 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

Ok but you do realise that there will be a significant increase in your revs at highway speeds and your six speed box will be operating over a much smaller speed range. Have you looked hard for a non A-LSD rear diff?

Yes mate I’m well aware. The shorter ratio is precisely why I went to a 4.11 as I wanted a closer ratio setup, the fact it’s a mechanical LSD is a bonus. This is very common in 32 GTR’s when people swap the getrag into them and retain the factory diff ratios. It’s also not that bad, using my current tyre size I’ve roughly calculated my new cruising RPM at 110km/h is 2800, which I can live with. 

16 hours ago, Hardwork said:

Sorry forget mention I have a 4.11 front diff ready to go in, will be just disconnecting the front shaft till I swap sumps.

Could this cause any trouble with your transfer case? I know it doesn't hurt the R32 box much, (something to do with preload on front drive shafts with R33, R34). Good luck with it all.

3 hours ago, WHITEBEAST said:

Could this cause any trouble with your transfer case? I know it doesn't hurt the R32 box much, (something to do with preload on front drive shafts with R33, R34). Good luck with it all.

He said he's going to remove the front tailshaft until sump is swapped, so transfer will not be physically connected to anything so it's not going to damage anything. I've done this and drove 3000km and back to Adelaide with no front tailshaft connected and Attesa fuse pulled in the 33, and the 34 has the same 2nd failsafe solenoid (which causes the transfer preload in a 33/34. 32 only has one solenoid) as the 33. That's how you rear wheel dyno one without depressurising Attesa.

Also regarding the Getrag with the 4.11 drive, remember what I wrote in the GTR box upgrade thread.

On 25/04/2019 at 11:07 AM, BK said:

Short ratio does not mean close ratio. Quaife, PPG, OS Giken 5 speeds have a really tall 1st gear compared to standard, then 2nd and 3rd are changed taller too to make 1st - 4th closer together.  Ratios are:

Standard 5 speed - 3.214, 1.925, 1.302, 1.000, 0.752
OS giken 5 speed - 2.695, 1.703, 1.236, 1.000, 0.826  (can have std 0.752 5th)

final drive 4.111

Now have a look at R34 Getrag:

3.827, 2.360, 1.685, 1.312, 1.000, 0.793
final drive 3.545

Ignoring 1st, 2nd to 6th gears it's similar ratios to a Giken 5 speed. May aswell not have the 1st in it with 4.11, so what's the point of using a Getrag 6 speed in an 32 / 33 unless you want a very short 50km/h Motorkhana gear ?

6th isn't the problem, as crusing rpm only increases a bees dick. The Getrag has a stupidly short first, but ignoring that 2nd - 6th is very, very close to having OS giken ratios 1st - 5th in a 5 speed. So as above Getrag 1st behind a 4.11 drive is essentially a motorkhana gear. You'd be probably taking off under normal conditions in 2nd, although 2nd is a bit taller again than an OS 1st. It'll be ok as most of the time will be between 2nd and 6th, 1st will rarely be used.

This isn't a problem, just pointing out that it's going to have a very, very short first.

1 hour ago, BK said:

He said he's going to remove the front tailshaft until sump is swapped, so transfer will not be physically connected to anything so it's not going to damage anything. I've done this and drove 3000km and back to Adelaide with no front tailshaft connected and Attesa fuse pulled in the 33, and the 34 has the same 2nd failsafe solenoid (which causes the transfer preload in a 33/34. 32 only has one solenoid) as the 33. That's how you rear wheel dyno one without depressurising Attesa.

Also regarding the Getrag with the 4.11 drive, remember what I wrote in the GTR box upgrade thread.

6th isn't the problem, as crusing rpm only increases a bees dick. The Getrag has a stupidly short first, but ignoring that 2nd - 6th is very, very close to having OS giken ratios 1st - 5th in a 5 speed. So as above Getrag 1st behind a 4.11 drive is essentially a motorkhana gear. You'd be probably taking off under normal conditions in 2nd, although 2nd is a bit taller again than an OS 1st. It'll be ok as most of the time will be between 2nd and 6th, 1st will rarely be used.

This isn't a problem, just pointing out that it's going to have a very, very short first.

Apologies, mistake on my part. They are all effectively shorter, not closer after the ratio swap. Potato moment! 

Agreed, 1st is already very short. But like you said, it’s 2-5 is what matters (to me anyway). I’ve driven a friends 34 GTR with 4.11 final ratio’s, and I fell inlove with it. Hence why I’m not concerned over anyone’s uncertainty of the usability.

2 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

You'd have to bleed out the transfer case (which is well documented and simple enough) to run a 33/4 GTR without front drive.

And as stated above, removing the front drive shaft will void any need to bleed out the attessa system. I’ll need to bleed it again anyway as I removed the feed line to the old A-LSD which shares the same fluid,  but many shops dyno GTR’s in RWD with the front shaft removed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...