Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've done everything, koyorad, oem pump, oem fan. Pressure test coolant system, vacuum bled cooling system, new headgasket, head crack tested, new radiator shroud, new oem fan clutch. 

Literally the only thing left is the electric fan on the front. It may be lazy so I'll look for a replacement. 

Any other suggestions? On a 40 degree day or can reach 95 degree with aircon on if waiting in traffic for long enough. Then I turn ac off it comes back down. 

Anyone else's r33 does this? I think it always has but since I've got gauges I'm more aware of it. 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/480594-r33-gets-hot-only-with-ac-on/
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, joshuaho96 said:

Is this why all the oil cooler kits on the market have laughably low thermostat crack temps like 70C? 

They work the same way that water thermostats do - i.e. they do not limit maximum temps they are designed to regulate minimum temps so that the engine is not operating below its efficiency temperature. Some are set at 70/ 80 deg C some are adjustable.

19 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

They work the same way that water thermostats do - i.e. they do not limit maximum temps they are designed to regulate minimum temps so that the engine is not operating below its efficiency temperature. Some are set at 70/ 80 deg C some are adjustable.

I was under the impression that you want to hold engine oil temps at 100C and coolant around 90C, so a 90C thermostat seems more reasonable? Pretty much every oil cooler kit for RBs has a thermostat crack temp of 70C which is kind of ridiculous.

Crack temp and hold temp are not the same thing. There's a whole mass and energy balance thing going in between the engine dumping heat into the oil and the cooler dropping it out. Just because the TS cracks at 70 does not mean that the cooler has any hope of holding the oil at that temperature. The factors at play are the "effective HTUs" of the core, which is comprised of the oil temperature and the cooling power of the ambient air flowing across it (more oil T drives HTUs up, less oil T drives HTUs down, likewise, more and colder ambient air flow drives HTUs up and vice versa). Against an ambient air T of, say 35°C, you only get ~half the HTUs out of the core at 70°C oil T as you would with 100+°C oil T. So even though you may see the 70°C crack T as being horribly low, it actually gives quite a soft start to the cooling power, which ramps up as the oil gets hotter (both because the TS opens more and as the hotter oil drives more heat transfer out of the core).

On 6/14/2020 at 11:23 PM, GTSBoy said:

Crack temp and hold temp are not the same thing. There's a whole mass and energy balance thing going in between the engine dumping heat into the oil and the cooler dropping it out. Just because the TS cracks at 70 does not mean that the cooler has any hope of holding the oil at that temperature. The factors at play are the "effective HTUs" of the core, which is comprised of the oil temperature and the cooling power of the ambient air flowing across it (more oil T drives HTUs up, less oil T drives HTUs down, likewise, more and colder ambient air flow drives HTUs up and vice versa). Against an ambient air T of, say 35°C, you only get ~half the HTUs out of the core at 70°C oil T as you would with 100+°C oil T. So even though you may see the 70°C crack T as being horribly low, it actually gives quite a soft start to the cooling power, which ramps up as the oil gets hotter (both because the TS opens more and as the hotter oil drives more heat transfer out of the core).

That makes sense, and explains the trend of electrically heated thermostats. But the OEM coolant thermostat cracks at 76.5C or so and under normal driving with good cooling it shouldn't greatly exceed 85-90C. In comparable conditions I would imagine a 70C thermostat on the oil cooler to lead to oil that never gets past 100C unless you exceed the cooling capacity of the system. Oil should be hotter than coolant so wouldn't you want to run an 80C or 85C thermostat?

22 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

But the OEM coolant thermostat cracks at 76.5C or so and under normal driving with good cooling it shouldn't greatly exceed 85-90C. In comparable conditions I would imagine a 70C thermostat on the oil cooler to lead to oil that never gets past 100C unless you exceed the cooling capacity of the system. Oil should be hotter than coolant so wouldn't you want to run an 80C or 85C thermostat?

Not really. Remember, the thermostat does nothing to cool the fluid. It just lets it through. Logically, if you covered all except for 10% of your radiator with cardboard, the fact that the thermostat cracks at 76° won't do anything to stop it from overheating. It is the cooling capacity of the cooler that determines that.

And so, the size of the coolant radiator and the size of the oil cooler core and the relative amounts of heat that need to be dumped out through these and the relative capacity to dump heat are somewhat unrelated. You put a little oil cooler on and it will do wonders, up to a point. Then it won't be able to cope. Bigger cooler will keep oil T under control until some higher load. Then it too won't be big enough.

A little perspective. I have a Neo. Stock oil/water HX under the filter, but with a sandwich plate added for oil T sensor. Aftermarket radiator. No oil cooler otherwise.

  • Neo thermostat runs about 10° hotter than vanilla 25's TS. So, just in completely normal operation, almost** regardless of the season, my oil temp shows ~90°C, which, given the oil-water HX, is pretty much the expected water temperature too. The target coolant T for a Neo is in the order of 90-92°, or something like it.
  • **In summer though, when it is really hot, my oil T will often be up at about 100°C. The oil-water HX can't move any more heat into the coolant, and the coolant is probably hotter too.
  • And when it is really really hot weather, my oil T will be up at 110°C after everything is settled down to a steady state. And I would presume that my coolant is quite a lot higher than 100°C too.
  • And when it is really really really f**king hot weather, my oil T will often peak at ~120°C as I get home after a ~30km drive from work in the afternoon. But that's fine. I'm not thrashing it. I'm just driving it.

All of the above ignores use of air-con. If I have the AC running then the worst case temps in the above list will happen at lower ambient temps.

Another mental note is that all of the above was with a different radiator than I have now. So we will have to wait until summer to find out if the new radiator is worse/same/as good.

1 minute ago, GTSBoy said:

Not really. Remember, the thermostat does nothing to cool the fluid. It just lets it through. Logically, if you covered all except for 10% of your radiator with cardboard, the fact that the thermostat cracks at 76° won't do anything to stop it from overheating. It is the cooling capacity of the cooler that determines that.

And so, the size of the coolant radiator and the size of the oil cooler core and the relative amounts of heat that need to be dumped out through these and the relative capacity to dump heat are somewhat unrelated. You put a little oil cooler on and it will do wonders, up to a point. Then it won't be able to cope. Bigger cooler will keep oil T under control until some higher load. Then it too won't be big enough.

A little perspective. I have a Neo. Stock oil/water HX under the filter, but with a sandwich plate added for oil T sensor. Aftermarket radiator. No oil cooler otherwise.

  • Neo thermostat runs about 10° hotter than vanilla 25's TS. So, just in completely normal operation, almost** regardless of the season, my oil temp shows ~90°C, which, given the oil-water HX, is pretty much the expected water temperature too. The target coolant T for a Neo is in the order of 90-92°, or something like it.
  • **In summer though, when it is really hot, my oil T will often be up at about 100°C. The oil-water HX can't move any more heat into the coolant, and the coolant is probably hotter too.
  • And when it is really really hot weather, my oil T will be up at 110°C after everything is settled down to a steady state. And I would presume that my coolant is quite a lot higher than 100°C too.
  • And when it is really really really f**king hot weather, my oil T will often peak at ~120°C as I get home after a ~30km drive from work in the afternoon. But that's fine. I'm not thrashing it. I'm just driving it.

All of the above ignores use of air-con. If I have the AC running then the worst case temps in the above list will happen at lower ambient temps.

Another mental note is that all of the above was with a different radiator than I have now. So we will have to wait until summer to find out if the new radiator is worse/same/as good.

Right, if the cooler is insufficient then the thermostat crack/full flow temp spec won't be what determines the oil temperature. But for street use when ambient is like 4C I would worry about the oil never getting up to temp on the highway and just turning to milkshake.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...