Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hello all,

98 R34 GTT RB25DET NEO engine with front mount Greddy intercooler, APExi intake, and kakimoto N1 3 inch full exhaust system , spec clutch, two stage boost "eliminated" (set to 7 )and a walbro 255 pump, nothing crazy.

looking at replacing the turbo with a fresh one as current one is original and definitely worn...

I would like a "bolt in"  type that utilizes all current mounting, connections , stock exhaust manifold and piping, looking at a "stock" bolt in replacement a/r .63

https://www.ebay.com/itm/153337361041

OR

a/r .70

https://www.ebay.com/itm/392114863244

 

what would be the advantages or disadvantages if I go with the .70, instead of a .63?

is there something else that would need to be changed to actually gain anything when putting in the .70 unit?

 

thanks

Edited by JC71

Both of those units are a long way from a stock bolt in option and would probably perform well below expectations compared to the OEM turbo especially without ECU tune changes.

OP - 0.7A/R comp housing does not provide any basis for comparison of 0.63 turbine housing on the other unit.  There's some very good resources out there in internet land if you want to get your head around turbos.

There are some decent replacement turbos out there that will bolt in and do the job you want.  Try an experienced supplier like Hypergear and see what can be done cost effectively.

Cheap turbos don't last. For a decent upgrade that will bolt in see Hypergear.

If you want to make more than 300kw you will need as a minimum a Nistune chip, better AFM ,  injectors and  fuel pump .. so a few thousands of dollars rather than a few hundred.

2 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

If you want to make more than 300kw

I didn't see OP say anything about 300kW?

6 hours ago, JC71 said:

looking at replacing the turbo with a fresh one as current one is original and definitely worn...

Unless you're actually planning on building the car or the turbo is literally pissing out oil, just leave it until it blows which it likely won't at 7psi...otherwise hiflow it, which will give you an actual and reliable improvement over stock while remaining as stock as you can get, and add a few extra grand for ecu and tuning as stated above

5 hours ago, GTofuS-T said:

I didn't see OP say anything about 300kW?

 

OP was looking to buy a turbo that promised 430hp which is just over 300kw

He was also looking at at TD06 promising over 400hp and asked

"is there something else that would need to be changed to actually gain anything when putting in the .70 unit?"

so I told him what would need to be changed...

 

  • Like 1
24 minutes ago, JC71 said:

are the stock turbocharger on the rb25det neo ball bearing or journal bearing type?

Ball, like all RB singles.

24 minutes ago, JC71 said:

what would be a good brand and model for a stock replacement?

There is no such thing off the shelf. All Garrett, BW, etc turbos are intended to be MASSIVE upgrades on the shitty 1950s technology that defines the stock Hitachi turbo.

No turbo that you will find on eBay from the usual scumbags is worth the $400 they want for them.

If you want a good "slight upgrade" replacement, then Hypergear's lowest end highflows are the closest sort of thing you can buy. Oh, and there is no problem buying from HG all the way from the US. You do realise that the world is round, right? And it is therefore possible for planes to fly all the way around? It's amazing what they can do with cardboard boxes these days.

Edited by GTSBoy

If you still have the stock ecu and stock injectors, a good replacement would be their "G2" profile 

https://hypergearturbos.com/product/nissan-rb25det-turbocharger-standard-high-flow-service/

Maybe consider using one of their donor turbos to save you posting them your current turbo. I'm sure they can post a turbo to the states. 

  • Like 1

Imagine the cost of shipping during coronatimes, Surely in the 300 million+ population of the united states there is someone who can rebuild a turbo locally...

 

22 hours ago, KiwiRS4T said:

OP was looking to buy a turbo that promised 430hp which is just over 300k

based on everything else the OP has stated he's looking for a stock replacement on a stock ecu not a 300kW upgrade...

  • 3 weeks later...
1 hour ago, TurboTapin said:

As already mentioned, do not under any circumstance purchase a cheap ching chong meow turbo off of ebay. You will regret it. 

The location of manufacture is not the issue.  But the spec of the unit (dimensions, bearings, quality of castings and machining) is.

I've run a Kinugawa on RB, generally it was fit for purpose especially at the price point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...