Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking for a bit of advice from people who have been racing for a while.

After spending a few days around purpose built race cars, I've been thinking about doing a refresh with my current 180sx race car. It's had a pretty hard time before I got it and has a few big crumpled rails, rust holes and poorly repaired inner guard/rad support and need to rebuild or replace motor. I want to get serious about a proper cage too but is it worth dumping money into this platform with parts starting to get hard to get?

 Or just start with something newer and more capable in standard form? Mainly do sprints and hill climbs and would like to do some more door to door racing. 

Even if anyone can point me in the right direction to contact someone who builds/preps race cars for a living as we don't have anyone in North Queensland. 

Most honest comment would be you need to consider what you want to achieve in motorsport.  Big difference between just having a run, and getting in there wanting P1.  By your report, there was a big time difference between you and Paul Morris around Reid Park.  Do you really want to beat him and others?

Talent, current seat time, car spec all part of the mix - as we'd all appreciate. 

High spec car is going to cost proper $$ and effort if you want one built with cage, suspension, brakes, wiring, gearbox and diff.  (Deliberately not talking about engines). And if you want aero, that's part of the initial build/spec planning.

Chassis - there's a reason Toyota 86 is popular.  Look at a bare shell and they are a substantial improvement over an S13.  As you would hope/expect.

Cage - you'd expect between $4-6k as a start, depending on how extensively you want things done (talking at good clubman spec here).  Perhaps best to look at regs of classes and events you'd like to compete in, and build to that (regardless of whether you stay with S chassis or move on). 

Turn key options are attractive, even if it entails making running improvements along the way.  My suggestions would be to at least consider an 86 Cup car, a Clubman, a MARC, and a TA2.

Repairs/re-engineering the S13 is also still a reasonably sound approach.  SEQ is a good 14+ hours run south for you, but there are a number of competent fabricators and engineers with experience to make one work well.  I've got a couple of ideas who may be useful, will send PM on details.

  • Like 3

Thank you for the advice. Will look at a few categories. Really looking at building a solid base for sprints and circuit/time attack to a club/state level but if going to build a cage want to make sure it's up to national standards.

 Definitely not going to catch guys who have been driving for years in different categorie but don't want to putt around the back for the hell of it. 

Have been told to contact norwell for a driver training day too by a local driver who has done a lot of stuff.

22 minutes ago, robbo_rb180 said:

 

Have been told to contact norwell for a driver training day too by a local driver who has done a lot of stuff.

This is the first and best thing to invest in. 100% agreed

  • Like 1

I mean, have a look at WTAC if you want to see what a S13/180 chassis can do. Or a porsche from 1991.

Racing is seat time + budget.

Can never have enough of either! There's no fast and cheap effective option. Some are better than others, sure, an 86 is a better platform than a 1950's Ferrari -  but in anything serious enough it pays to check out the regulations first.

And if there's no regulations then the objective really should be 'smiles' 

  • Like 1

The cost of consumables was a big thing for me, my Skyline was expensive, hell, gwarboxes were a consumable item in the end, my MX5 was cheap as chips.

  • Like 1
10 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

I mean, have a look at WTAC if you want to see what a S13/180 chassis can do. Or a porsche from 1991.

Racing is seat time + budget.

Can never have enough of either! There's no fast and cheap effective option. Some are better than others, sure, an 86 is a better platform than a 1950's Ferrari -  but in anything serious enough it pays to check out the regulations first.

And if there's no regulations then the objective really should be 'smiles' 

The current car is very capable but always good for a sanity check and others experience. 

Smiles are always had when I drive ?

2 hours ago, mlr said:

The cost of consumables was a big thing for me, my Skyline was expensive, hell, gwarboxes were a consumable item in the end, my MX5 was cheap as chips.

Yeah that's one of the things with this platform now that good gearboxes and motors are hard to find for reasonable prices and some classes don't allow gearbox casing upgrades. This car is actually not too expensive to run maintenance wise as it is. 

So far looked at qld time attack rules and MA regulatory/sprint and qld outlaw racing rules and it's pretty open regards to body, gearbox, suspension, wheel stuff. 

16 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:


Racing is seat time + budget.

And if there's no regulations then the objective really should be 'smiles' 

Agreed.

Unlikely that Roger Penske will be contacting any SAU people to come drive for him anytime soon, and even WTAC have regs.

I find that while my 33 requires $$ and effort to prepare and run, it's the enjoyment of actually running it that makes it feel worthwhile.  

There's a whole lot of sense to consider running budget, and it's good to maximise seat time while we can.

Yeah budget a big one. 

Just priced up a rebuild with standard stuff and a forged one. Not too much difference in the scheme of things but that money could be used to go towards something newer. 

Definitely won't be getting any phone calls ?

The effort vs reward thing is big too but I have a lot of free time to look after a car properly. 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
    • If you think that's harsh, go experience a KAAZ 🥲 Thoughts and prayers for Dose. I had mine modified by a diff shop to make it less brutal, no idea what they did but it's not as brutal as before. The Asian in me was being tight before and went KAAZ instead of a Nismo, lesson learned.
×
×
  • Create New...