Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alright guys searching, has, well been tedious to say the least. The forum is filled with excellent information regarding this subject and I'd like everyone's help consolidating information to make future information hunts a less time consuming endeavor for those in the future. 

I'd like to stack together in a single thread everyone's head fastener choice.

The format of each post I would like to see fall along the lines of 

Motor: (example- rb25 75t)

Head: (example- rb25det-neo)

Fastener: (example- ARP 202-4301)

Reason for fastener choice: 

Power goal: (example- 450hp/335rwkw) 

::BONUS:: 

Dyno sheet image. 

lets try and keep it simple and keep the thread clean.

Data data data we cant build bricks without clay 

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481257-rb-head-studs-comparison/
Share on other sites

Another bit of information from ARP's customer service department 

202-4301 is for stock motor rebuilds 

202-4309 is for high horsepower builds

According to the customer service representative I was in contact with anything over factory numbers is considered a high horse power build. 

20 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Challenge accepted, will try over 450kW using ARP2000.

Side note, quoting power is HP is like measuring your penis length starting from your anus.

Well I’m at 580kw on ARP2000’s, nil issues. With a Tomei head gasket. 
@500kw using ARP2000’s and a Cometic head gasket, the head gasket failed. 
when the head was removed the torque of the head studs was checked and I was told they were torqued to spec. 
a mate of mine bought a JHH built motor. Motor was built for 1000hp, they used a Nitto head gasket and ARP 2000 head studs. 
when making the decision on what to use for mine I contacted numerous shops and engine builders. With my target being 600kw. Most recommend ARP2000’s.

One engine builder stated he won’t use 625’s. 

On 03/10/2020 at 11:09 PM, BK said:

Let's keep it simple then as requested:

90% of any RB = ARP2000

Money to burn or mega boost = ARP CA625+

/Close thread

Many different opinions, but BK hit the nail on the head, I’d go even further, for 95% of builds, ARP2000’s would be more then capable. 
Remember, CA625’s are a fairly new product, it wasn’t that long ago 2000’s were the best available and were being used, successfully on 1000+hp  builds. 

  • Like 2

Yep, probably 95% ARP2000 being adequate, and only ever used that until recently. Decided to splash out on the CA625+ when the 6466 went on the 32. For comparison, the RB26 torque specified for 2000s is 110ft/lb and 130ft/lb for the 625s.

  • Like 1

It is but it’s also information a lot of people tend to leave out in these kinds of threads or when making claims and is the reason there a very few people I actually trust when it comes to listening to information And will also give credit where credit is due

there are so many variables with a discussion like this, even something as basic as the head gasket 

4 hours ago, r32-25t said:

Stock, which was probably 99% of the problem lol 

?‍♂️

You didn't really expect a stock head gasket to hold 30ish psi with a 6466 did you ? ? I've still got the stock gasket on the 33 and I'm very nervous running 22psi with that, and if it does let go I won't be surprised.

I suspect that you have not actually "lifted" the head as you've said before, more like blown a big piece out of the gasket. Please show a pic of the gasket when you eventually get to it ?

  • Like 3

I didn’t know what to expect as I didn’t know anyone that had tried it, when it did let go I wasn’t surprised or upset about it. 
 

you’re probably right and why I’ve started saying it’s pushing water rather then lifted the head 

5 hours ago, r32-25t said:

you’re probably right and why I’ve started saying it’s pushing water rather then lifted the head 

How much water is it pushing? When I had the cometic head gasket, it started pressurising the cooling system around 27-28psi through the 68/70, which was just shy of 500kw. It wasn’t that bad though, would basically fill the overflow bottle if I gave it a hard time, but would suck the water back into the radiator when it cooled down. When the head came off you could see where the combustion gases were making their way to the water channels, cylinder 3 was the worst and I think cylinder 5 from memory. 
It did hold together for over a year, and I took it on a couple of 500km in one day drives. 

I’m not sure how exactly how much, was enough that after a run you could see where the water had sprayed out the overflow, I drove it home that night and checked the water the next day and it was under vacuum. 
I have driven it slowly since that night and it’s not making a mess when I drive it like that, I just want to fix it sooner rather then later to prevent any chance of more damage 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Starting with issues 1 - 5, we have already run into a problem...!  Issue #4 contained 2x front brake calipers, instead of 1 caliper and 1x steering knuckle. Will have to call DeAgostini on Monday to sort it out. Anyway here's some photos.  Issue #1 is the front bumper, headlights and number plate. Issue #2 is the front wheel (with "We produced with spartan air." text on the centre cap!) and tyre, the front lip spoiler and cylinder head cover with ignition coils under the centre cover... which will never be seen again. Issue #3 is the bonnet and cylinder head. Issue #4 is the front strut, brake disc (with laser etched metal discs) and brake caliper. I stopped here because of the issue with the missing steering knuckle.  Next update will be #5 - #10 in a few weeks.
    • DeAgostini is one of a few companies that release quite large (the largest commonly available size actually) 1/8 scale models in a series of weekly issues over 100 - 110 instalments.  They release different models for different markets and DeAgostini Japan have release the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo last month. I've made two of these 1/8 scale sized cars (one an R35 GT-R from 2012 - 2014, the other I'm just about halfway through, a BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the 2Fast 2Furious movie) so when this R32 was announced there was no way I could ignore it as it's my favourite out of all Nissans.  Each issue costs around $20 so it costs about $2.2K when completed. I suppose it is very expensive for what it is, but the quality and details are really very good, and there are many "gimmicks" like fully functioning exterior and interior lights operated with a remote control, working steering, all doors/bonnet/boot/fuel lid open and close, the side mirrors fold in and it even has a speaker for the engine revving sounds when you turn the lights on.  Each issue comes with a magazine that tells the story of the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo from the first design stages of the BNR32 to Group A homologation and the various racing version that were run in the Japanese Group A and JGTC, and Australian Group A.  So I plan to update the build in this thread 5 issues at a time.  https://deagostini.jp/r32/?srsltid=AfmBOooKjxDc4EUK2rmXqMBPgyHfFJ24s4oEPJBNpnF-lFlsRoW0PE6P
    • As per title.. has anyone used so far? Keen to hear results, comparisons. In the market for a new mani for my new turbo. Any issues cracking?
    • Re read everything that has been written about this in this thread.. Let us know if you're still confused.
    • This would be a new pump with new gears. I'm just unclear on whether it's a good idea to run more oil pump flow if you don't actually need said flow. Oil level is set a minute or so after shutting off a warm engine so wouldn't the high RPM oil level in the sump end up lower all things equal? Plan is OEM clearances, main concern in my mind is whether the OEM pump can keep up with the flow requirements of any additional oil coolers.
×
×
  • Create New...