Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey fella's 

 

I have an issue with my clutch in my OS88 - its a direct clutch services twin plate. 

long story short, it was making a clunking sound when on your way back up from the floor after pushing the clutch to floor. 

 

Turns out its the the throw out bearing carrier - the carrier has a groove around the inside of it and its slipping almost off the end of the sleeve that it travels on inside the bell housing. 

 

This leads me to believe I need to get a longer or higher Bearing Carrier I understand Nissan make a bunch of different ones. 

 

My main question here is - 

If the bearing carrier is longer, will It make the clutch disengage higher up or lower?

 

 

I take it this is a push clutch right ? If so what is the recommended bearing carrier for your clutch ? A stock carrier is 14mm, but most multi plates generally use bigger ones. Because multiplate clutches are usually more compact, as the distance from back flywheel to pressure plate fingers is reduced from standard, meaning you have to correct that length with a longer carrier to get the correct travel. For example ATS triples have 20mm, ATS twin 30mm, R3C 26mm, R4C 18mm and so on. If this length is too short, your release throw will be reduced as the clutch fork fulcrum point won't be correct.

Nissan do different carriers from about 12mm - 32mm in 2mm increments. We had to correct one recently from NPC. It had a stock 14mm carrier, but some wanker packed an extra 4mm of washers under the clutch fork pivot as a ghetto way to try and not use the correct carrier. This is also not the correct way to do it as your fulcrum point will still be wrong as the fork won't sit parallel on the carrier, even if the calculated length is correct. Solution was to remove the 4mm of washers and fit an 18mm carrier.

Basically you need to find out what carrier you have and what carrier you're supposed to have, as it definitely doesn't sound right.

Interesting - this is the information I’m after 

 

yes it’s a OS88 so push type. 
 

can you explain the method to measure what sized carrier I’m after??

and what point the measurements are taken on the carrier to determine what size it is? 
 

thanks for your help so far

  • 3 weeks later...
On 06/11/2020 at 9:52 AM, Deano 1 said:

 what point the measurements are taken on the carrier to determine what size it is? 

@Deano 1The measurement on the carrier is taken from where the clutch fork presses to where the inner bearing race sits and is the length that is extended for multi plates. For example this is a stock R32 GTR 14mm push type bearing carrier with a release bearing installed:

IMG_20201125_095703_8.jpg

IMG_20201125_095734_9.jpg

As far as working out which one you need, it's all about measuring everything to work out how far away your bearing is from the pressure plate fingers and adjusting accordingly. I do have a drawing of how to do it to fully explain it. I'll post it up for you when I can dig it out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...