Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I’ve done a search but haven’t been able to find anything. Is there anyone on here who understands turbos who would be able to explain the difference in how these turbos would behave / respond compared to one another. 
obviously housings can affect this so let’s compare 

1. 6870 gen 2, 1.0ar T4 divided rear 

2. 6875 gen 2, .96ar T4 rear 

now I know the 6875 is rated a little higher, will it actually make more power and how much will you sacrifice in lag? 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/
Share on other sites

  On 06/12/2020 at 7:59 PM, r32-25t said:

Wouldn’t the compressor maps be the same for the fact they’re the same compressor wheel and housing 

Expand  

Not sure, on their website says the 68/75 is a more modern design turbine

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944123
Share on other sites

  On 10/12/2020 at 8:21 AM, SiR_RB said:

68mm comp wheel will max out well before the 75 rear 

 

Expand  

So there would be no reason to go 6875 over 6870? 
this is what I’m trying to find out, I’d like to actually talk to someone who is really switched on with turbos and not tied to any one brand. When I sell my motor I’ll probably let it go with the entire hot side. As my new motor is a 2.7, I’d like a turbo that is responsive, but can still make decent power and give a decent push when turned up. 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944315
Share on other sites

Why not the 6466 then ? I tossed up going the 6870, then I thought why ? People are making 500 - 600rwkw with them and it will always be more responsive than the 6870, so I went the 1.00a/r 6466.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944320
Share on other sites

As Bk said, seriously consider the 6466

 

if you have a full house head and a decent rear (1.00+ in size) I have seen the 6466 push 580ish kw and would be an absolute rocket on the street with amazing response with the 2.7

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944326
Share on other sites

  On 10/12/2020 at 2:39 PM, BK said:

Why not the 6466 then ? I tossed up going the 6870, then I thought why ? People are making 500 - 600rwkw with them and it will always be more responsive than the 6870, so I went the 1.00a/r 6466.

Expand  

This is what I’m thinking, but I’m also not a Precesion fan boy, so I’d like to know all my options, I’ve heard good things about the Garrett 3584rs, mixed reviews on the new G series, good things about Borg Warner, I’ve also looked at Xona rotor? 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944327
Share on other sites

  On 10/12/2020 at 7:20 PM, SiR_RB said:

As Bk said, seriously consider the 6466

 

if you have a full house head and a decent rear (1.00+ in size) I have seen the 6466 push 580ish kw and would be an absolute rocket on the street with amazing response with the 2.7

Expand  

Did 146mph on the 580kw blue line dyno graph

 

have not been back since the tweaking of exhaust setup, also going a CNC Shimless head at the moment and redoing the pipework etc.

 

Keen too see how far we can push the 6466

 

dyno.thumb.jpg.9ff39030b8dd4f21abf51a2759c27089.jpg

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944332
Share on other sites

  On 11/12/2020 at 12:04 AM, hattori hanzo said:

Did 146mph on the 580kw blue line dyno graph

 

have not been back since the tweaking of exhaust setup, also going a CNC Shimless head at the moment and redoing the pipework etc.

 

Keen too see how far we can push the 6466

 

dyno.thumb.jpg.9ff39030b8dd4f21abf51a2759c27089.jpg

 

 

Expand  

What size engine is that on?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944333
Share on other sites

  On 10/12/2020 at 7:25 PM, Old man 32 GTR said:

This is what I’m thinking, but I’m also not a Precesion fan boy, so I’d like to know all my options, I’ve heard good things about the Garrett 3584rs, mixed reviews on the new G series, good things about Borg Warner, I’ve also looked at Xona rotor? 

Expand  

My problem with the new Garrett turbos is there’s currently no twin scroll option

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944334
Share on other sites

  On 11/12/2020 at 7:15 AM, SiR_RB said:

What rear is on the 64 mate 

Expand  

it was .84 with the 146mph

Have since gone 1.15 but did not get any massive changes, have since gone to 4" dump and CNC head to assist unlocking a few more ponies.

goal is 150mph on a 6466

 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944360
Share on other sites

  On 11/12/2020 at 10:58 PM, hattori hanzo said:

it was .84 with the 146mph

Have since gone 1.15 but did not get any massive changes, have since gone to 4" dump and CNC head to assist unlocking a few more ponies.

goal is 150mph on a 6466

 

Expand  

What gearbox?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944366
Share on other sites

  On 11/12/2020 at 10:58 PM, hattori hanzo said:

it was .84 with the 146mph

Have since gone 1.15 but did not get any massive changes, have since gone to 4" dump and CNC head to assist unlocking a few more ponies.

goal is 150mph on a 6466

 

Expand  

What boost was that at mate?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944368
Share on other sites

Had a chat with the guy from Garrett turbos yesterday about turbo options, he recommended the G30 900hp or G35 900, said they would offer good response and solid top end, another option is the G35 1050hp, this turbo is to supersede the 3584rs and will be released in a T4 divided rear housing option in the 1st quarter of 2021. 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/481617-6870-vs-6875/#findComment-7944382
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, nah. I had the actuator rod off it today. The arm will not move at all. Neither out, nor in. Yeah, you'd think so, but I've been thinking about that. Even when the actuator rod fell all the way off at the beginning of this saga, it would build more boost and faster in lower gears than it would in higher gears, and you'd think that that was the opposite of what should happen. But I strongly suspect that there is a thing with the gearing getting the revs to rise faster, that there must be some transient effect with the gas flow rate rising quickly, that you don't get with the more steady state case of the higher gears. Keep in mind - the gate is not shut in either of my weirdnesses. So things are not "normal". We normally think about a turbo spooling up (below the wastegate target) with the gate shut. I have all sorts of mental models running now where the gate is a little bit open, and having it stuck open allowing gas out while it should be going through the turbine has all sorts of weird effects (in these mental models). I'm thinking in the higher gears, the ex mani pressure builds to the point where enough gases spill out the wastegate to just prevent the pressure rising much more at all, or just creeping up, all the whole the revs are increasing and getting closer to the point where a gear shift becomes necessary.
    • Is it possibly wastegate actuator itself is sticking, or even the rod to flapper? Otherwise I reckon things are getting a bit rusty/worn   Also odd it won't boost in 3rd to 5th, but will in 1st, I'd expect the other way around with it slightly open as there's more time on your way to redline for it to spin up
    • Does anyone know ow what these two plugs are for and if they should be unplugged? Just put the dash back together and can't remember if these were plugged in before or unplugged! (Blue and white plugs) 🤦🏽‍♂️
    • Did some FASTing ...got the impression that the actual part# was a moot point ; seems all of these hardlines for coolant are discontinued/NLA... like, I take it you're after the hardline that bolts onto to the manifold...that's NLA according to amayama & nengun .... ...just to clear up some confusion, they typically mounted the AAC valve to the intake manifold somewhere near a coolant passage, so the body of the valve heats up & holds it open when engine's up to temp - no coolant flows through the valve, it's a mechanical, thermal connection.
    • And now the bloody flapper is jammed slightly open. Lazy as all f**k in 3rd-5th (very hard to convince it to make much boost before you run out of revs), but will make 12 psi in 1st, which shouldb't be possible with a 5 psi spring and controller set to <10 psi. Methinks I'm lucky it jammed where it did, rather than fully closed. It's actually a well weird situation. Careful examination of what's happening in the back of that housing when the gearbox comes out and all the other stuff (injectors, AFM retune) is supposed to be done, next week.
×
×
  • Create New...