Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

On 12/12/2020 at 6:17 PM, hattori hanzo said:

30psi on the nose 

it was not taking any more and making any more power, hoping the head unlocks a bit more and its capacity to take 35psi or so

Thats interesting as I also found the relative "limit" (you could always cram more I suppose) or point of diminished returns to be right at 33psi on my 6466 0.84 T4. I also had a similar best trap speed very close to yours at 147 and dyno'd at a smidge over 770 at that boost level, that setup was a 2.6L, 10:1 comp, 282s, and a PPG box. 

 

When you say not taking anymore, do you mean you were getting minimal gains like ~ 5 hp per additional PSI? Or had Boost Duty cycle/WG maxed out? 

 

Your car is always great to see and very well done. Congrats on a real weapon. 

On 21/02/2021 at 11:08 AM, BrianJ said:

Thats interesting as I also found the relative "limit" (you could always cram more I suppose) or point of diminished returns to be right at 33psi on my 6466 0.84 T4. I also had a similar best trap speed very close to yours at 147 and dyno'd at a smidge over 770 at that boost level, that setup was a 2.6L, 10:1 comp, 282s, and a PPG box. 

 

When you say not taking anymore, do you mean you were getting minimal gains like ~ 5 hp per additional PSI? Or had Boost Duty cycle/WG maxed out? 

 

Your car is always great to see and very well done. Congrats on a real weapon. 

It was putting on less, more like 2/3hp per psi so was pointless.

 

since we have added a 4" TBE, 1.15 rear housing and the new head hoping to get a bit more out of it by dropping the back pressure.

 

Machining delays have put a hault to the new build, but hopefully have the results in may or so i guess.

  • 1 year later...

Back to turbo selection, just saw the new Garrett G40 1150, seems like it comes in t4 divided in all rear housing A/R’s. 
is this turbo comparable to what’s been discussed or does it fall into the big/laggy category. 
I’m going to give GCG a call today and have a chat about it 

  • Like 1
On 10/12/2020 at 9:21 PM, SiR_RB said:

68mm comp wheel will max out well before the 75 rear 

 

This was said ages ago but just for sake of accuracy - people have definitely been able to squeeze more out of the 6875 than they could with the 6875.   The turbine definitely helps, even if the 68mm compressor is pretty much tapped it does help squeeze enough that if you're looking for absolute max power from a 68mm inducer it's worth doing.

 

 

On 7/4/2022 at 4:21 PM, r32-25t said:

Would be nice if the 6875 was available with a twin scroll rear

Yep, would be perfect if it did, don’t understand why as the 7675 has twin scroll rear and I may be wrong but I’m assuming the rear is the same. I spoke with a shop today who advised to go 7675 with the 1.12 twin scroll rear housing, with the correctly set up manifold (proper twin scroll) with twin gates, can get the 7675 to have the same/similar response as a 6870. 
for me this would be a wicked set up and if I decided to go sequential in the future would make more then enough power. 

On 7/4/2022 at 5:28 PM, Old man 32 GTR said:

Yep, would be perfect if it did, don’t understand why as the 7675 has twin scroll rear and I may be wrong but I’m assuming the rear is the same. I spoke with a shop today who advised to go 7675 with the 1.12 twin scroll rear housing, with the correctly set up manifold (proper twin scroll) with twin gates, can get the 7675 to have the same/similar response as a 6870. 
for me this would be a wicked set up and if I decided to go sequential in the future would make more then enough power. 

I find that extremely hard to believe. A 7675 is a significantly larger snail than a 6870. 

  • Like 2
On 07/04/2022 at 5:53 PM, r32-25t said:

All the gen2 precision with a 75 and above don’t have twin scroll options

They do. The Sportsman versions of the gen2 7675 and 7685 are available in divided T4 housings. Even the 8385 and 8685 has them available in T4 divided.

  • Like 1
On 07/04/2022 at 4:58 PM, Old man 32 GTR said:

Yep, would be perfect if it did, don’t understand why as the 7675 has twin scroll rear and I may be wrong but I’m assuming the rear is the same. 

Don't get too excited though as the Sportsman gen2 7675 rear housing don't fit the more common gen2 7675HP.

The Gen2 CEA 6875, 7275 or 7675 all share the exact same 75mm turbine wheel (82mm inducer, 75.08mm exducer) and fit turbine housing group E.

Other housings for different turbines include 62mm CEA - turbine group B, 66mm CEA - turbine group C, 70mm CEA - turbine group D, Promod - turbine group F.

On 07/04/2022 at 9:03 PM, r32-25t said:

So it does, I never looked at that one before just looked at the first few and thought the rest must follow suit 

Turbine groups B, C and D all have divided T4 housings available - turbine group E or F does not, so Brett is kinda sorta right when referencing turbos you'd actually use.

The Sportsman 7675 has a completely unique 82mm inducer 84 trim turbine wheel (which would have a bigger 75.16mm exducer according to my calculations) and unique internally bigger housing for itself, with a bigger exhaust discharge meant for 4 inch exhausts.

image.thumb.png.1622160c78a1f8e4bf50bf2f8b996953.png

On 4/7/2022 at 4:58 PM, Old man 32 GTR said:

Yep, would be perfect if it did, don’t understand why as the 7675 has twin scroll rear and I may be wrong but I’m assuming the rear is the same. I spoke with a shop today who advised to go 7675 with the 1.12 twin scroll rear housing, with the correctly set up manifold (proper twin scroll) with twin gates, can get the 7675 to have the same/similar response as a 6870. 
for me this would be a wicked set up and if I decided to go sequential in the future would make more then enough power. 

We all wish... You cant beat physics.. Especially when they are all the same design... 😂 

Just adding the turbine from 70 to 75mm id expect it to be 500rpm lazier let alone bunging on a 8mm bigger comp wheel

  • Like 1
On 12/04/2022 at 2:00 PM, jet_r31 said:

We all wish... You cant beat physics.. Especially when they are all the same design... 😂 

Just adding the turbine from 70 to 75mm id expect it to be 500rpm lazier let alone bunging on a 8mm bigger comp wheel

Does my head in, I have no idea why workshops do that kind of thing - feels like it's just getting customers to dump all the money with them as well as ending up with a big number result at the end which get other people's attention, but pushes the person who is actually wanting to build their "dream vehicle" past the point of no return and it's now more or less a dedicated straight line acceleration car.   I guess if people believe it when they're given that speel they potentially are half trying to talk themselves into it anyway, in which case that's fine haha.

The only way that would seems plausible is if the rest of the setup has significantly changes, like adding a solid amount of displacement and/or fixing issues that the setup previously had haha.   Even then, with the huge amount of added "mass away from the axis" will cause a much much higher moment of inertia... if the threshold doesn't seem that much worse, the transient response will be rubbish by comparison.

I would wait for a couple of results to come out, but if you're looking for something bigger than a 6870 that still drives like a reasonable street setup then there is a possibility than the G40 1150 *could* be a really solid option.  I've already seen someone claim to go from a Precision 7275 to a G40 1150 and claim a significant improvement in driveability and not losing any power but no specific data yet.

The 6870 is something of a beast in terms of how much power it makes versus how usable it is, so really anything that is capable of making more power is likely to add more lag as well.   I suspect there may be interesting releases before the end of this year that could mix it up, but we'll see...

 

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 2

A friend had a G35-1050 an RB30. Made 840hp and could not push further due to back pressure. They appear to be better suited to an Rb26

Switched to a 6875 and has made over 1000hp. That's peak power only for a few RPMs, call it 950hp for most of the top end rev range.

On 13/04/2022 at 9:07 PM, usmair said:

A friend had a G35-1050 an RB30. Made 840hp and could not push further due to back pressure. They appear to be better suited to an Rb26

Hence the new G40 just makes so much more sense however not to say Precision turbos aren't good - they're king of big power.

  • Like 1
On 4/13/2022 at 8:37 PM, usmair said:

A friend had a G35-1050 an RB30. Made 840hp and could not push further due to back pressure. They appear to be better suited to an Rb26

Switched to a 6875 and has made over 1000hp. That's peak power only for a few RPMs, call it 950hp for most of the top end rev range.

Out of interest on topic.. Off topic

Tao/hypergear can build a g35-1050 comp wheel turbo with a cut down gt42 turbine to 70mm in a bb housing for a pretty good price

Be cool to try seeing as its a more appropriatly sized turbine

Edited by jet_r31
On 12/4/2022 at 12:20 PM, Lithium said:

I guess if people believe it when they're given that speel they potentially are half trying to talk themselves into it anyway, in which case that's fine haha.

 

Lol, this 100% describes me, I just needed that little push. 
Its killing me because I want it to make big power, but I also want it to be able to make moderate power and be nice to drive (but I feel this will all come down to how good the tune is). 
obviously you can’t have your cake and eat it too in this scenario, I will be making sacrifices one way or another. 
A good friend of mine has been pushing me to a 7675 from the start, he was running this turbo on his 2.7 R34 was running this setup in front of a getrag and later an Albins sequential. I’ve been in that car and it was a little laggier then my 6870 (and my 6870 was bolted to a rb30. 
Well I now own a 6875 and a 7675 so I can go either way, but to be completely honest I never really liked the fact the 6875 was not twin scroll. I still like the G40 1150, maybe I should buy one of those too? Lol

  • 1 month later...

Looking at downsizing from my 7685 down to a 6870 or G40-1150 to help keep the new box setup alive 😂 6875 was in the mix but as stated above, no twin scroll housings. Not sure if 6870 1.32 would be too small on a 3.4 or to step up to a 6875 .96 regardless of TS housing.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, the latter. No diff should have a centre replaced without checking clearances because its unlikely to be the same as whatever came out. Not that that stops most people just checking a new centre in
    • Major thread necro but how bad of a job is it to DIY? Looking at it online it looks like if you reuse your ring and pinion as long as those are in good condition it should be fine to just pull the axles/front cover and replace the diff that way? Or should I be replacing everything and doing preload measurements/gear mesh testing like the factory service manual mentions for the rear diff?
    • in my list I had the R33 GTR as the best Skyline. Infact I had all GTR's (33>34=32), the NSX, the GTO, the 300ZX, the 180SX, the S15 better than the FD RX7. I had the MR2 and the A80 as 'just' better. I also think the DC5R Integra looks better but this is an 01 onwards car. I also think the FC>FD. It's almost like aesthetics are individual! The elements @GTSBoy likes about the FD and dislikes about the 180 are inverse in my eyes. I hate the rear end of the FD and it's weird tail lights that are bulbous and remind me of early hyundai excels. They are not striking, nor iconic, nor retro cool. The GTO has supercar proportions. I maintain these look much better in person (like the NSX) especially with nice wheels and suspension which is mandatory for all cars pretty much. Some (or all) of these you have to see in person to appreciate. You can't write a car off until you see one in the flesh IMO. Like most people we probably just like/dislike cars which represent certain eras of design or design styles in general. I also think the 60's Jag E type looks HORRIBLE, literally disgusting, and the 2000GT is nothing to write home about. FWIW I don't think the Dodge Viper Gen1's have aged very well either. You can probably see where I rate bubbly coupes like the FD. I know we're straying now but the C4 and C5 absolutely murder the Viper in the looks department as time goes on, for my eyes. Wouldn't surprise me if people who love the FD, also love the MX5, Dodge Viper, Jag E Type, etc etc.
    • I used to hate R31s, and any of the other Nissans that led up to it, and any of the Toyotas with similar styling, because of the boxiness. They were, and remain, childish, simplistic, and generally awful. I appreciate R31s a lot more now, but only the JDM 2 door. The ADM 4 door (and any other 4 door, even if they are unique compared to our local one) can eat a bowl of dicks. The Aussie R31 is also forever tarnished by their association with stereotypical bong clutching Aussie R31 owners of the 90s and early 2000s. I think the Nissans of the 70s (other than 120Y/180B/200B) are far superior looking to the 80s cars. The 240K era Skylines are boss. The same is broadly true of Toyotas. Hondas don't ever register in my thinking, from any era. Mitsus are all horrid shitboxen in any era, and so also don't register. Subarus are always awful, ditto. Daihatsus and Suzukis also don't generally register. They are all invisible. I think the SW20 MR2 looks fiddly. The 3000GT/GTO is like that but way worse. Too many silly plastic barnacles and fiddly gimmicks ruined what could have been a really nice base shape. Kinda-sorta looks like a big heavy ST165 Celica coupe (and I'm not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing). I think the 180SX is dreadfully bland. It's not bad looking. But it has no excitement to it at all. It's just a liftback coupe thing with no interest in its lines, and bad graphical elements (ie wide expanses of taillight plastic on the rear garnish). The S13 Silvia is a little better - getting closer to R32 shapes. But still....bland. S14? Nope. Don't love it. S15...a little better. Probably a lot better, actually. Benefits from not being like a shrunk in the wash R34 (where the S13 was a shrunk in the wash R32 and the S14 looked like a Pulsar or something else from the stable on Nissan mid 90s horrors). The Z32 was hot as f**k when it came out but hasn't aged as well as the A80. Keep in mind that I think the R33 is the most disgusting looking thing - and out of all the previous cars mentioned is objectively closest to my precious R32. It's just....real bad, almost everywhere you look. And that is down to the majority of what was designed in the 90s being shit. All Nissans from that era look like shit. Most other brands ditto. In that context, the FD absolutely stands out as being by far the best looking car, for reasons already discussed. Going behind the aesthetics, the suspension alone makes it better than almost any other car.  
    • If they just called it the "Mazda Tiffany", it would have been spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...