Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

'92 R32 GTS4

106,000kms

Bar & plate Hybrid FMIC

Work equip wheels 17x 8, 17x7

Kuhmo ectsa supra tyres

R34 turbo

R33 GTR Fuel pump

3 inch exhaust from dump pipe

GTR V spec II shocks

Lowered King Springs

HKS EBC

HKS sequential BOV

HKS turbo timer

Autometer boost guage

Polished engine

Nismo gear knob

Airfilter

Front strut bar

Tinted windows

Factory 10 Stacker CD player

SAFC (5 dial) not tuned

Custom chip for ECU not fitted.

Bendix ultimate pads

Oil catch can

Rego till July 2005

Timing belt and water pump changed at 80,000kms.

Serviced at 5,000kms intervals if not more frequently.

$16500 neg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48164-nsw-r32-gts4-fs/
Share on other sites

Just few quick questions;

a) How does it handle with different width tread front/back?

B) Did the turbo upgrade provide any noticable power gain / how much?

c) Reason for sale? (Upgrade to RB26? *smirk*)

Always good to see another humble 'baby' gtr owner

Cheers :headspin:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48164-nsw-r32-gts4-fs/#findComment-976061
Share on other sites

Hey there mate,

A) Handles really well, heaps tighter than stock wheels.Not a huge difference once the tyres are on 245's (rear) & 225's Front).

B) Yes the turbo was a great upgrade for power/$ factor. With a tune of the SAFC and the chip installed 180rwkw is very very reachable.

C) Just want to have a break from performance cars for a little while. Just come back from overseas and need to get myself together financially.

I would have loved to put an RB26 in. Went through my mind a number of times so did a Neo RB25 too.

Take care mate,

Ben

Just few quick questions;

a) How does it handle with different width tread front/back?

B) Did the turbo upgrade provide any noticable power gain / how much?

c) Reason for sale? (Upgrade to RB26? *smirk*)

Always good to see another humble 'baby' gtr owner

Cheers  :headspin:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48164-nsw-r32-gts4-fs/#findComment-976602
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the offer mate, but I'm really after something out of the performance seen for the time being, something more economical, also I am tossing up whether to go back to uni.

Your car sounds interesting though!

Regards,

Ben

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48164-nsw-r32-gts4-fs/#findComment-998189
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...